[kidd]

I was careful to use libertarian "creed" in my reply. I recognize the difference. My point is that Libertarians have had 22 years since this article was written. If it is fast growing, you could have easily formed a "real" Libertarian party. But it hasn't happened. Either its not fast growing, or Libertarians are sheep that are afraid to break off from Harry Browne's shadow. I suspect the first is the case.

[FreeTally]

Real freedom for the majority as a result of common sense, not imaginary freedom for a select few deviants as a result of a philosophy.

Thats rich. "Freedom for the majority". Not to mention that whats "common sense" to one, may not be to the guy next door. Oh well. I love you dictator types who think you support a Constitutional government.

[scottiewottie]

It is a fatal mistake for Libertarian thought to be promoted by the most abusive and corruptable labor unions that are political parties. Libertarian Party is an oxymoron. Most libertarians do not belong to the Libertarian Party for that reason.