The Next Reformation? 9.5 Thesis Posted on 'Church Door'!

The Prophecy Reformation Institute ^ | 2001 | John Noe

[L,TOWM]

Wow, I must have missed that blessed day.

Did it happen after after 9/11/01?

[CCWoody]

Does the fact that Protestants can't seem to agree on anything,bother you?

HAHAHAHAHA! Very funny! Who cares if the soliders of Rome all march together if they are heading in the wrong direction.

Which reminds me: Nate, in your position, who is/was(?) the beast and the harlot?

[RnMomof7]

"Only a New Yorker grabs the bull by the horns; and then only once."

Hey I resemble that remark ***GRIN******

Meow

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

Only Hymenaen to those who do not understand "context."

I have my response to your damning of my soul with that title.
Jim West was way out of line on that one.
My response to Jim Wests Article

[Biblical Calvinist]

No, the original "95 Thesis" statements were posted on the UNIVERSITY chapel door at Wittenburg.. as such; they WERE read, copied (due to the invention of the printing press a few years earlier), then distributed throughout the LITERATE world. The Reformation started largely among the intelligentia, but SPREAD rather quickly to other social classes as well.

[Codie]

If ya'll cannot present a united front amongst yourselves,why should anyone else believe you?

[don-o]

Bump for a mark.

This may get interesting, if we can do a discussion of ecclesiology and not be overwhelmed by RC bashing posts.

My point is always that the Roman Catholics were the first Protestants. It is understandable thet the monk Luther rebelled against the mess of the western and papal church.

Go East, young man, Go East.

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

None....they changed it back in A D 70 :)

LOL, LOL!!

I will have to use that one sometime. Thanks!

[Centurion2000]

bump

[Squire]

The Reformation started largely among the intelligentia, but SPREAD rather quickly to other social classes as well.

It would probably be more accurate that it started largely among and spread most quickly among those who had a financial stake in its success -- namely the various little princes in Germany, merchants freed from the Catholic Church's bans on usury, and the faux gentry created by Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries.

[CCWoody]

Meow

You are no longer "kitten" with a [tongue like a] whip; you have given that honor to another.

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

Which reminds me: Nate, in your position, who is/was(?) the beast and the harlot?

The harlot, or Babylon, was Jerusalem of that day.
They were the only one to be called "adulterous" because they were the only one with a "covenant" with God.

[BibChr]

LOL! Here would be another similar answer:

None. It's already been changed. Just believe.

Dan

[don-o]

9.5. We have been guilty of proclaiming a half-truth-a partially delivered faith to the world and to fellow Christians. We must repent and earnestly "contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3)?

Honest question is "Why and how did you find yourself in this sad situation"

If, as you admit, you have lost your way, it seems that you might try to remember where you lost the way.

[CCWoody]

The harlot, or Babylon, was Jerusalem of that day.

Ok, so who are/were the 7 kings and who is/was the 8th (who is also the beast) and who are/were the 10 horns (kings for an hour)?

And while, you are in charity answering questions, who were the 2 prophets who were raised from the dead and who was the false prophet?

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

And while, you are in charity answering questions, who were the 2 prophets who were raised from the dead and who was the false prophet?

If only charity gave me all the answers.
I am studying the more difficult symbols and their possibilities to fulfillment always. You happened to ask an easier one the first time.

Again, the how is more difficult than the when. The when was very plainly taught and self explanitory.

[Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle]

I find it interesting that on that reading list you would list books by at least two men who would vehemently disagree with your position (Sproul & Gentry).

I have my response to your damning of my soul with that title.

I don't damn your soul. I see nothing wrong with that title. If I spout Gnosticism, call me a Gnostic. (I'll read your response to West tonight)

[NATE4"ONE NATION"]

Sproul disagrees but he respects our position as a more biblical one than any "dispensational" one.
Gentry is in the class of "heretic" labelers but he is the one who convinced me of "partial-preterism" and yet he alone, gave me the desire to see why he himself was filled with inconsistancies.
Gentry alone persuaded me to become a "full-preterist."

I don't damn your soul. I see nothing wrong with that title. If I spout Gnosticism, call me a Gnostic. (I'll read your response to West tonight)

Hymenaeus was a man who strayed from the faith because Paul clearly taught the resurrection as future.
Paul is dead and AD 70 was future of his writing Philipeans.
If I am wrong, yes, I can understand that "label."
But I have not strayed from the faith as Hymenaeus.

[RnMomof7]

We do not hide our differences ..because we believe that personal study and debate (Apologetics) are healthy and lead to truth..ours is not a faith like eastern religions that ask man to turn off his intellect.Being of one mind does not constitute truth..Truth is not found in unanimity, or perhaps not even in consensus

From your first "Pope"

1 Peter 3
14 But and if ye suffer for righteousness' sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled;
15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:
16 Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.