Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron and the Clintonites
The Weekly Standard - (The Daily Standard) ^ | David Brooks

Posted on 01/12/2002 9:29:12 PM PST by oioiman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: semper_libertas
Republicans and Democrats are both very equally guilty of selling out the American people to the corporate giants.

AS LONG AS congress and the executive branch hold dominion over us and our businesses - this courting of those who make and enforce the rules will be with us.

Last I recalled, though, corporations couldn't vote - I think maybe they *should* along with only other *real* property owners.

It WOULD prevent the mindless mob of citizens that vote now from voting themselves largess from the treasury at every opportunity.

61 posted on 01/13/2002 6:57:53 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: aristeides
A couple of things regarding Bentsen... He's now running for the Democrat nominee to be their candidate to fill the Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Gramm. Also he is a nephew of Lloyd Bentsen, not his son. Enron has passed money to many politicans..... Democrat and Republican.....

Open Secrets

Name

Overall Total

89-90

91-92

93-94

95-96

97-98

99-00

01-02

Ken Bentsen (D-Texas)

$42,750

$0

$0

$12,000

$13,250

$6,000

$9,500

$2,000

Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas)

$38,000

$0

$0

$24,000

$4,000

$3,000

$6,000

$1,000

Joe L. Barton (R-Texas)

$28,909

$1,900

$5,000

$8,050

$5,262

$4,697

$4,000

$0

Tom DeLay (R-Texas)

$28,900

$1,000

$500

$3,750

$12,000

$3,250

$8,400

$0

Martin Frost (D-Texas)

$24,250

$1,750

$6,250

$4,000

$2,750

$2,500

$6,000

$1,000

Charles W. Stenholm (D-Texas)

$14,439

$0

$500

$800

$500

$2,000

$9,639

$1,000

Chet Edwards (D-Texas)

$10,000

$500

$500

$1,500

$1,500

$500

$4,500

$1,000

Doug Bereuter (R-Neb)

$10,000

$750

$1,250

$1,500

$1,500

$2,500

$2,500

$0

Larry Combest (R-Texas)

$9,820

$350

$0

$500

$0

$1,000

$7,970

$


65 posted on 01/13/2002 7:13:50 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: hogwaller; doug from upland
During the Clinton era, all we had to go on was anecdotal evidence and piecing things together, as powerful people don't go around telling you what they did to screw other people.

Did you *actually*, seriously, intend to write this?

67 posted on 01/13/2002 7:28:18 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Corporations should NOT vote.

If corporatins can exist as an entity - subject to taxation, subject to being held liable, subject to violations of law - I say they should have a 'vote', a vote that allows them *some* mesasure of determining how they will be treated in the future and gives them some measure of representation.

68 posted on 01/13/2002 7:30:53 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Diogenez
"Lay and Enron were also big supporters of Anne Richards, GWB's predecessor as Texas Gov."

In that short press conference the other day when President Bush first answered some of the reporters questions about Lay and Enron, I heard him say something to the effect that the first time he met Lay was in the early 90's (1992, I think he said) at some sort of political event and at that time "Lay was supporting Ann Richards for Governor", against him. It wouldn't be hard to find the exact quote.

72 posted on 01/13/2002 8:11:36 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
CORPORATION n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.

... oh THAT convinces me ...

<sarcasm>

Maybe you guys just need to get at the root of all this evil in the world as it 'works' it's pull on man - SATAN.

73 posted on 01/13/2002 8:16:31 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
"Corporations are already FAR more represented than you or I are."

You have hit the nail right on the head with that statement. Here is yet another fine example of how Enron won federal approval to have the government look the other way while consumers are raped.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — After Enron Corp. used its vast web of political connections to win December 2000 passage of commodities trading legislation that helped the company shield its energy trading activities from government scrutiny, California’s energy crisis suddenly took a dramatic turn for the worse as artificial supply shortages led to frequent rolling blackouts, according to a new Public Citizen report released Friday.

The legislation reducing government oversight of energy trading was muscled through Congress — without a Senate committee hearing — with the aid of U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas. Gramm was chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over the legislation he co-sponsored, but he chose to bypass his committee, and the bill was quietly tacked onto a "must-pass" appropriations bill late in the session. Gramm’s wife, Wendy Gramm, also aided Enron’s rise to power. As chairwoman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, she pushed through a key regulatory exemption on Jan. 14, 1993, just as she was about to leave office. Five weeks later, she joined Enron’s board of directors, where she served on the board’s audit committee and had access to key financial information about the company.

On Sept. 4 of this year, Sen. Gramm announced that he would not run for re-election in 2002. Then in November, shareholders and federal regulators learned the extent of Enron’s financial troubles. Since the revelations, the company has filed the largest corporate bankruptcy in history, and shareholders, lenders and Enron employees have lost billions of dollars.

"Millions of people in California paid outrageously inflated prices for electricity because of Enron’s ability to manipulate the markets for electricity and natural gas, and thousands of Enron employees and shareholders have been devastated because of insider dealing and financial trickery," said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook. "Republicans in Congress investigated Whitewater for years and spent millions of dollars. But that pales in comparison to Enron-gate. Congress needs to turn over every rock and see what crawls out from underneath. They should ask, who knew what and when did they know it? Investigations into any criminal conduct should extend to the political players who aided and abetted this company’s rapacious rampage across America. We should make no distinction between the officers who committed these acts and the politicians who enabled them."

Public Citizen called on Congress to force Wendy and Phil Gramm and Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill to testify under oath about their knowledge of Enron’s alleged accounting fraud and use of offshore tax and bank regulation havens. Public Citizen also said that President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and political adviser Karl Rove should also be required to answer questions about whether administration officials discussed policies involving energy price controls, other energy regulations or tax havens with Enron representatives. Bush adamantly resisted price controls even though California’s wholesale energy costs had almost quadrupled in 2000; at the same time, Enron’s trading revenues nearly tripled.

The Public Citizen report — Blind Faith: How Deregulation and Enron’s Influence Over Government Looted Billions from Americans — details the political connections and government actions that helped Enron become the most prominent energy trader in the world before its recent collapse. The report found that: From June through December 2000, California experienced only one Stage 3 electricity emergency (which requires rolling blackouts). But following passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which shielded Enron’s and others’ trading activities from regulators, the state had 38 Stage 3 emergencies — ending only when federal regulators finally imposed price controls in June 2001.

Enron took advantage of lax government oversight and formed a complex web of more than 2,800 subsidiaries — 874 of which were located in offshore tax and banking regulation havens, mostly in the Cayman Islands. Upon assuming office in 2001, Bush — who has accepted $2 million from Enron during his political career and counts Enron chief executive Kenneth Lay as a close personal friend — scrapped plans put into place by former President Bill Clinton to limit the ability of corporations to effectively use these offshore havens. The action came at the height of high West Coast energy prices, which would have allowed Enron to funnel billions in excess profits to offshore accounts.

As a lame-duck chairwoman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Wendy Gramm exempted Enron and other energy futures traders from oversight in response to a request by Enron. At the time, Enron was a significant source of political funding for her husband. Five weeks later, she joined the company’s board and served on the board’s audit committee, where she would have had access to the company’s financial details. The chief executive of Arthur Andersen, Enron’s outside auditor, testified before congressional investigators in December that "illegal acts" may have been committed at the company.

"Buried amid the rubble of Enron’s fallen house of cards are the political ties that allowed this greedy company to rip off the public and its own employees, who saw their retirement accounts vanish overnight — even as top executives were bailing out and walking away with hundreds of millions of dollars," said report author Tyson Slocum, research director for Public Citizen’s Critical Mass Energy and Environment Program. "There’s an object lesson here for those who decry government regulation: Absent a strong regulatory presence, greed prevails and consumers get the shaft. We’ve seen it time and time again."

link

74 posted on 01/13/2002 8:20:37 AM PST by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Corporations are already FAR more represented than you or I are.

Corporations ... don't ... vote ...

Are you by any chance a fan of Captain McQeegs Campaign Finance Reform?

I am not. And I say: "Spend as much as you like, on whomever you like, whenever you like."

I see you guys see that we require a 'nanny' and MORE government regulation (oh boy!) whereas I say let US - the US citizen - sort it out ...

I can handle that - can you?

75 posted on 01/13/2002 8:21:11 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
"...the US Constitution guarantees INDIVIDUAL rights not CORPORATE rights."

Unfortunately, the almighty dollar leverages CORPORATE rights over INDIVIDUAL rights.

ENRON is the wake up call for campaign finance reform.

76 posted on 01/13/2002 8:33:37 AM PST by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: Diogenez
"The Repubs. got more money, but so far, it looks like the Dems. "hoed" out more for what they got."

Please elaborate. I'm not much of a farmer.

78 posted on 01/13/2002 8:48:53 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spanky_mcfarland
You have hit the nail right on the head with that statement. Here is yet another fine example of how Enron won federal approval to have the government look the other way while consumers are raped.
The 'socialists' are having a field day with this one ...

In the 'free enterpise' system (what's left anyway) - the stockholders sure enjoy the ride up on a stock - but scream bloody murder on the way down ... noone seems to read the financials - are willing to *believe* the gospels dispatched by a newly born commodity (can we not al agree that energy is really a commodity?) 'trading' company that could have been squashed by the REAL commodity trading markets - should that trading body have decided to enter that field ...

Funny, nobody seems to make the connection with the price slump in energy that we saw this spring and summer -

- what was Enron's *core* business and big *money-maker* again?

79 posted on 01/13/2002 8:57:17 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson