Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition and SQL Server 2000 Advance over UNIX
Microsoft.com ^ | November 11, 2001

Posted on 01/10/2002 6:12:44 PM PST by Bush2000

New Platform Record on TPC-C Non-Clustered Benchmark Test
Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition and SQL Server 2000 Advance over UNIX

Las Vegas, NV – November 11, 2001 - In his keynote address at Comdex today, Bill Gates announced a significant milestone for Microsoft's enterprise platform: a Unisys ES7000, running Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition and SQL Server™ 2000 Enterprise Edition, set a new high-water mark for Windows performance on the prestigious TPC-C Non-Clustered Benchmark test. Auditors clocked this system processing an astounding 165,219 transactions per minute, a new world-record for Windows-based systems. Moreover, at $21.33 per transaction, this result lays claim to the best price-performance of any entry in the top ten performance list, whose remaining systems cost twice as much per transaction on average.

Redefining the Enterprise Operating Environment

Until recently, only UNIX systems could claim a place on the elite top-ten list for TPC-C Non-Clustered (single server) performers. Competition for these spots is intense, and server hardware manufacturers invest millions of dollars and countless hours vying for position. They are often rewarded for this in the marketplace, where enterprise customers rely on the integrity of TPC data as they evaluate new business platforms.

Now Windows is challenging this elite group, and making it hard for proprietary UNIX vendors to justify the high costs of their systems. With the introduction of Windows Datacenter Server on large-scale systems like the 32-processor Unisys ES7000, Windows and SQL Server now have a platform that can be measured against large-scale UNIX systems.

The results have been astounding. With today's announcement, Windows and SQL Server have not only moved to sixth place in the top ten performance list, they have staked a claim to the best price/performance of any system in the group. While the average price/performance of the other top ten performers is approximately $42 per transaction, Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition is the leader at just over $21 per transaction, nearly twice as cost-effective. Windows has begun to shift the economics of large-scale systems as it has done with smaller servers and personal computers in the past.

A Changing Landscape

The performance record of Windows-based systems is growing with phenomenal speed. Windows has long been the undisputed leader for scalability on smaller systems—those equipped with one to four processors. Prior to the release of Windows 2000, Windows and SQL Server held four of the top ten performance records in the TPC-C Clustered benchmark. Today, Windows and SQL Server hold every result in the top ten, including the staggering world-record of 709,220 transactions per minute.

With today's result, Windows and SQL Server now hold two of the top ten performance results on the TPC-C Non-Clustered list—the benchmark that measures the performance of large, scale-up systems like the Unisys ES7000. Once the domain of costly proprietary vendors like Sun Microsystems, today's list includes Unisys, IBM, Compaq, HP, Fujitsu, and Bull—all members of the Windows 2000 Datacenter Server Program. Sun is no longer found on the top-ten TPC-C Non-Clustered performance list.

Sun's absence is not surprising given the effect Windows has had on the economics of single-server systems. A look at the top ten price/performance results on the TPC-C Non-Clustered benchmark shows that Windows 2000 and SQL Server 2000 occupy every record on the list.

Momentum Going Forward

Windows' performance record has been expanding rapidly, in both scale-up and scale-out arenas. The Windows 2000 Server Family and SQL Server 2000 hold world records on SAP-SD Three-tier, SAP-Retail, PeopleSoft eBill Payment, PeopleSoft 8 CRM, Onyx, Great Plains, and Pivotal eRelationship benchmarks.

Today's announcement marks one of the first results published on Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition, part of the next generation of the Windows Server Family. With an impressive base of evidence on Windows 2000 and a glimpse of things to come, Windows is poised to extend its performance and scalability leadership well into the future.

Notes: Today's benchmark result was achieved using a 32-way Unisys ES7000 running Windows Datacenter Server Limited Edition and SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition. The system performed 165,219 transactions per minute (tpmC) at a cost/transaction of $21.33. The complete system will be available on March 10, 2002, while the Unisys ES7000 and SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition are available today. For more details, see http://www.tpc.org.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: WriteOn
Why don't you go post it on slashdot and see how far it flies MicroSerf.

Better: Post it where the Sun don't shine.
21 posted on 01/10/2002 6:51:44 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Today, Windows and SQL Server hold every result in the top ten, including the staggering world-record of 709,220 transactions per minute.

It's even more staggering to think that Windows crashes about once every 1000 procedure calls which only take about 10 instructions to perform while one process create in a commercial transaction database procedure takes about half a million instructions. (in other words Windows crashes many times per penny in that $21 transaction)

22 posted on 01/10/2002 6:54:13 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
So. You maintain that windows had to be rebooted 169 times and still kicked Unix's ass. You ain't helping your cause.
23 posted on 01/10/2002 6:55:31 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I wonder if they manipulated this like they manipulate the polls (http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2102244,00.html).
24 posted on 01/10/2002 6:56:31 PM PST by markn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markn
yeah. they manupilated it. they made windows and sql server perform better. damn them cheaters.

WHAT A BUNCH OF WHINEY BABIES!

25 posted on 01/10/2002 6:59:31 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WriteOn
If this wasn't so pathetic it would be funny. Let me get this straight. The richest man is going to PAY his employees to get on message boards to talk up a product used by most of the world?

Even my elderly Mother who doesn't know a computer from a light switch knows about Microsoft - and reads about it - and about Gates - because they have a direct effect on nearly everything done in this country (and elsewhere, for that matter).

According to you, Ford employees shouldn't discuss cars.

You need to get a grip. (And no, I don't work for Microsoft).

26 posted on 01/10/2002 7:00:44 PM PST by SmartBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
It's even more staggering to think that Windows crashes about once every 1000 procedure calls which only take about 10 instructions to perform while one process create in a commercial transaction database procedure takes about half a million instructions. (in other words Windows crashes many times per penny in that $21 transaction)

Proof?
27 posted on 01/10/2002 7:00:45 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: markn
of course it could just be that they manupliated it by rebooting 169 times during the test...

just how redicules can people be...

28 posted on 01/10/2002 7:00:50 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markn
I wonder if they manipulated this like they manipulate the polls (http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2102244,00.html).

Rrrrrright. Cuz, God knows, it's impossible to impersonate somebody posting from the microsoft.com domain... </sarcasm>
29 posted on 01/10/2002 7:01:58 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
his own statement means that no only can windows/sql server outperform unix but it can outperform unix while being rebooted 169 times per test.
30 posted on 01/10/2002 7:02:47 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: go star go
Yeah, beautiful. Damn, they're slow.
31 posted on 01/10/2002 7:03:22 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Yeeeeaaaaaaahhhhh baby!

Bump me on the SQL Server threads!

Osama bin Ellison's days are numbered!

32 posted on 01/10/2002 7:03:41 PM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
More spam.
33 posted on 01/10/2002 7:04:43 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Slow like unix/oracle huh?

note that some of the others cost $21 dollars or so and you say damn! they won but then you look at the number of transactions and realize that they processes half as many transactions per minute meaning that the transactions take twice as long. so you save $1 but it takes twice as long or twice as many systems.

34 posted on 01/10/2002 7:07:18 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: go star go
Slow like unix/oracle huh? note that some of the others cost $21 dollars or so and you say damn! they won but then you look at the number of transactions and realize that they processes half as many transactions per minute meaning that the transactions take twice as long. so you save $1 but it takes twice as long or twice as many systems.

If anybody wants a single reason why Sun and Oracle are gunning for Microsoft, it's because their days of high-margin, fat-laden contracts are over. All that you have to do is look at the TPC numbers and it becomes clear. I'm still waiting for Ellison to pay up on his $1M challenge to anyone who could defeat Oracle's TPC numbers.
35 posted on 01/10/2002 7:13:52 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
My apologies, I had forgotten the def'ns.

$21/tps-C is a price/performance ratio by accounting for the 5-year price of HW, SW, and vendor maintenance. The 5 yr price is then divided to obtain the $/tps rating.

TPC-A is a simple banking transaction.

TPC-B is a database only benchmark with terminals network and 2/3s of long term storage removed.

TPC-C is an order-entry application with a mix of interactive and batch transactions including queued transactions, aborts and elaborate presentation services,...about 10 times more complex than TPC-A.

Costs in 1991 were about $10,000/tps for small/simple transactions; $100K/tps for medium interactive transactions and about $1M /tps for large complex transactions.

$21/tps is impressive.

36 posted on 01/10/2002 7:15:40 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I'm all for technical discussions, but this is little more than a sales pitch.
37 posted on 01/10/2002 7:15:46 PM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
I'm all for technical discussions, but this is little more than a sales pitch.

It's called education. Many people on the tech_index are probably not aware that Oracle and Sun are getting their asses kicked. And we are constantly bombarded with how much more *performant* they are (gag).
38 posted on 01/10/2002 7:20:19 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: markn
I wonder if they manipulated this like they manipulate the polls

More Free MS Adverstising? Is FR now the MS newswire?

This is pure propaganda. He couldn't get away with this on any technical board, where people would laugh him out of the joint.

A look at the Systems Tested in that test show that no high-end Sun machines were tested, and the MS machine that got the top results -- a Compaq ProLiant DL760-900-256P -- costs $10,603,803. The best IBM machine they tested Oracle on was an HP 9000 Superdome Enterprise Server -- costs $8,272,786.

Leave out Suns, spend $2.4 mil more on the Windows box, and don't even test Linux.

I especially love giving MS $2.4 mil more in hardware. Now *that* is a fine way to cook the books.

39 posted on 01/10/2002 7:23:36 PM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Bill Gates needs to read Transaction Processing by Jim Gray.

Incidentally, Jim Gray is a Research Fellow at Microsoft and, more than anyone, is probably responsible for the boost in performance of SQL Server in recent years.
40 posted on 01/10/2002 7:23:42 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson