Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates: XP invades the home
ZDNet News ^ | January 7, 2002 9:21 PM PT | David Becker

Posted on 01/08/2002 9:55:32 AM PST by Bush2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Spock3000
It's geeks like you who give Mac people a bad name.
61 posted on 01/08/2002 2:41:12 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000;CheneyChick
That's eye candy. Poof! It's no more signficant than the color of the car they drove a decade ago.

Follow-up, Bush2000, to the car design comments of Tuesday and comparison to computer industry: When you get a chance, take a look at second section (Marketplace) of Wall Street Journal, today, Wednesday, January 9, 2002, pages B1 and B5:
"The New Celebrities: Car Designers" by Todd Zaun and Gregory White.

"[The role of car designers] in the auto industry grows as more consumers pick style over horsepower.....consumers' tastes are shifting from concern about horsepower and fuel economy to a craving for style."

62 posted on 01/09/2002 3:59:30 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: bwteim, Spock3000
Few people -- in my esteemed estimation -- care about the aesthetics of how their computer looks. That is nearly always secondary to what it can do.
64 posted on 01/09/2002 7:58:07 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Bush2000
Most script kiddies hack into devices because they can, and then use it for attacks against other machines. You know, like Code Red and Nimbda.

People that don't care if their web server/desktop machine/refrigerator get hacked are the cause of much grief to other Internet users. If one doesn't recognize this and build in security accordingly, one's OS will continue to be hacked regularly costing businesses millions of dollars in lost time and pissing off those of us that think it's rude.

Personally, I'd like to see someone pull a Jay and Silent Bob routine on people that let their machines get infected. I know that the thought crossed through my mind while I was putting block rules in my firewall to stop 7,231 machines on my DSL provider's network alone from constantly querying my webserver day and night.

If someone went around to every Windows user that got infected with such worms with a baseball bat and reduced their machines to sparking junk, Microsoft would have a much smaller footprint in the market.

Knitebane

66 posted on 01/09/2002 10:40:00 AM PST by Knitebane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Spock3000
Yea cause most people don't have taste:those people elected clinton twice didn't they.........?

Oh, please. You're going to deny that Mac users are not, by and large, a bunch of liberal tree-hugger supporters of the DNC? We know better. Do a search at http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/fecimg/advindsea.html and see what "Jobs, Steve" gave to the DNC.
67 posted on 01/09/2002 10:45:32 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane
Most script kiddies hack into devices because they can, and then use it for attacks against other machines. You know, like Code Red and Nimbda.

Dude, there's simply no way that you would ever be able to hack into my network. My hardware firewall laughs in your general direction.
68 posted on 01/09/2002 10:52:02 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Few people -- in my esteemed estimation -- care about the aesthetics of how their computer looks. That is nearly always secondary to what it can do.

That is your estimation - as I proffered in post #62, people care about design, apparently, over function, as the WSJ article discusses.

Same will/has happened in other product lines. In my not necessarily esteemed estimation, that's why the original iMac was successful, its color/design. Not necessarily its ease of use, or for what it did.

Also, the iMac concept was successful, apparently, consider how many grey boxes are now 'colored'.....

Given that, I think we will soon see another round of various hardware manufacturers redesigning, not necessarily improving the innards, ala automotive industry.

And finally, read recently that either BMW or Mercedes will be working on a common 'car' for the innards, but will be offering various "outsides". Sort of like elevations of a house.

I think you are wrong on this one, Bushy. Don't misjudge popular culture!

69 posted on 01/09/2002 10:52:13 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
That is your estimation - as I proffered in post #62, people care about design, apparently, over function, as the WSJ article discusses.

Um, no. It's reality. 95% of all computers sold are PCs. PCs are plain. Simple. Inelegant in design. Obviously, people don't care about design based upon this real market share distribution.
70 posted on 01/09/2002 10:54:54 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Speaking of which, how is MACs competition with DOS coming along?
71 posted on 01/09/2002 10:58:40 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000;CheneyChick
Um, no. It's reality. 95% of all computers sold are PCs. PCs are plain. Simple. Inelegant in design.

What you and I *were* talking about was design and function - you are now assuming that I was talking about95% market share of your Windows and their 5% Macs....wrong.

If all "PCs" (as in Windows boxes) are plain, then why do manufacturers offer and sell different colors, etc? Some PCs (pick your OS) are quite elegant in design.

Again, geez [pause, sounds like I'm talking to my Uncle Earl's grandfather, and he's been in a coma since 1989], you, Bush2000,basically opine that:
"form does not matter":

I, bwteim, state:
"it do......"

I'm gonna have to take you out behind my firewall and knock some sense into you... /heheheh.

72 posted on 01/09/2002 11:08:07 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
When I go on site, one of the first thing I ask the admins is, "When were you last hacked?"

If the reply is "Never!" I know my work is cut out for me, because not only have they been hacked, they don't even know it.

The vast majority of Windows machines have insufficient logging to determine if a hack has taken place. I've seen Trusted Solaris machines running Checkpoint get hacked so thinking that a firewall can't be hacked is ludicrous.

If you really think that you can't be hacked, you are fooling yourself. Typically, hacks come in over ports that the firewall allows, for instance, in order for a web server to be useful, TCP port 80 must be open for incoming traffic. Thus, the attack takes place on the web server over port 80. The firewall never even sees the attack.

Anyone that thinks that a firewall can secure a network has no idea how a network actually works.

This is the kind of thinking that makes Windows the number one hacked OS.

Knitebane

73 posted on 01/09/2002 11:16:28 AM PST by Knitebane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bwteim, Bush2000
95% of all computers sold are PCs.

Tuesday January 08 09:29 PM EST

Ratings: ABC Coming Up Roses


Story

I guess this likewise "proves" that ABC makes the best television entertainment!

"Numbers equals quality".

Not!

I wonder, would it be kosher for ABC employees to come on here and continually post ABC press releases? This is starting to sound like a cheap way to launch a business . . .

74 posted on 01/09/2002 11:23:17 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
earth to Dominic:

How about addressing the form vs function issue. I did not come up with the 95%. It could be any number.

:)

75 posted on 01/09/2002 11:29:54 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
How about addressing the form vs function issue.

I prefer the cheap PC's, personally. Never owned a Mac.

I see Apples as the 'Lexus' of computers. Higher priced, and definitely a better machine.

But I definitely have no taste, as far as 'aesthitics' are concerned. My wife won't even let me dress myself.

I was just pointing out that 'more PCs sell' isn't evidence of quality, and shouldn't have been used as a point for trying to prove that PCs are 'better'.

76 posted on 01/09/2002 11:34:35 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
"Numbers equals quality". Not!

Who cares? MS is laughing its way to the bank while you slave and grind away for chump change.
77 posted on 01/09/2002 11:55:31 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Who cares? MS is laughing its way to the bank while you slave and grind away for chump change.

I know *your* only concern is how your employer fares, and how much they make.

The rest of us are far more interested in actual quality, power, etc. issues.

I prefer PCs for many reasons. But your insulting of Mac users is pathetic. Macs are good machines with a good OS. To each their own.

78 posted on 01/09/2002 12:13:23 PM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
The rest of us are far more interested in actual quality, power, etc. issues.

All the while, ignoring the positive comments from new XP users...

I prefer PCs for many reasons. But your insulting of Mac users is pathetic. Macs are good machines with a good OS. To each their own.

Macs are reasonably good machines. My issue isn't with the machines but with the comments from the self-esteem-challenged Mac users who insist that their Mac is superior to the PC. And don't pretend that they don't say this: It's rampant on all of these threads. Frankly, I'm sick of their crap -- and I'm gonna fling it right back at 'em.
79 posted on 01/09/2002 12:18:16 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Utopia

Oh, that is so true. I have a system, on which I have running (if I want) in separate windows:

  • Linux
  • Windows NT
  • Windows 2000
  • Windows 95

I can drag/drop between Windows -- its the funniest thing ever! Can't do that on a PC!!!

Just out of curiosity, how many of those (other than Linus's toy OS) have you paid for?

80 posted on 01/09/2002 1:06:36 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson