Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Robinson & FR accused of censorship
WhatReallyHappened.com ^ | 4 January 2002 | WRH.com goobers

Posted on 01/04/2002 10:01:12 PM PST by Vigilant1

FREE REPUBLIC ADMITS IT IS PRO-WAR AND CENSORS ALL POSTS NOT IN ACCORD WITH US GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA

NOW MAKING THE ROUNDS ON THE NET. Cited under "fair use" for educational purposes.

____________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 02:50:39 -0800
From: "Jim Robinson"
Organization: Free Republic
To: "Larry McDonald"
Subject: Re: What Are You Scared Of?

Those who are coming in here to post a bunch of propaganda to smear Bush or otherwise harm the war effort are going to be deleted.

I guess you missed my posts where I said that I am 100% behind our President and the war. I don't care if it's Ron Paul, Larry McDonald, or the head of the John Birch Society himself. I do not want it on FR. And I do not want a bunch of 40 year old conspiracy crap. Not interested.
____________________________________________________________

There you have it. Free Republic is not an objective reporter of the facts but a blatent supporter of the Bush administrations' war for oil, and by Jim Robinson's own admission.

In another post, Jim states...

____________________________________________________________
Jim Robinson (Free Republic)
by JIM ROBINSON in This thread

Lots of grumbling lately about deleted posts. Well, my friends, the simple truth is the game has changed. We are now at war.
____________________________________________________________

Of course, Jim Robinson has it wrong. We're not at war. Only Congress can state otherwise and there has been no formal declaration of war by anyone. Bush hasn't gone to Congress to ask for such a declaration because that would restore Congress to its role in the balance of powers doctrine on which the nation was founded. Bush has no intention of allowing Congress to second-guess him, and indeed Bush has flat out declared that he will not bother informing Congress of intelligence operations from this point forward as is required by law.

Yes, we have been attacked, but it's not really known by whom. Even the FBI admits the IDs on which they based their accusations were faked using the stolen identities of middle eastern Arabs, some of whom have since turned up alive. From this it should be obvious that we cannot really know who was on those planes, only who we are supposed to blame.

But Jim Robinson isn't interested in these facts. He's spiked threads pointing out that the FBI admitted the IDs used by the hijackers were phony. Jim Robinson has spiked threads about how some of the accused hijackers have turned up alive. Jim Robinson has spiked many of the threads dealing with the Israeli spy scandal and the fact that the US has classified evidence linking some of the arrested Israeli spies with the events of 9/11. Jim Robinson has spiked threads suggestng that Bush has exceeed his constitutional authority. Jim Robinson will tolerate no doubts about the righteousness of Bush's war for oil.

But more than that, Jim Robinson displays an arrogant assumption that the presence of a war justifies anything. He argues that we should get behind the government because (he claims) there is a war. But translate that to Germany of 1939. Was it the right thing for the German people to unquestioningly back Hitler because there was a war on? Or would the German people (and the world) have been better served taking a pause and a closer look at just what the government was doing? And if Germany should have examined their government's claims a lot closer, then how can we not do the same now?

Free Republic has shown its true colors. Jim is "not interested" in facts, only in selling Bush's wars. Free Republic isn't about news any more, only about propaganda.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 461-470 next last
To: Registered
1-234-567-8910 ... The pattern didn't fool ya?

We were being facetious. Everyone knows that the Akron, Canton, and Youngstown, Ohio environs have the 234 NPA, which overlays the 330 NPA, and which became mandatory on 10/30/2000. :)

361 posted on 01/05/2002 1:21:03 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
"I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested."

Marine Brigadier General Smedley Butler, 1933

So now the U.S. is making the "-stan" countries safe for global oil companies. Not much changes in 100 years....

362 posted on 01/05/2002 1:22:27 PM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluesDuke
Once again, point well taken. And away we go!!

Illegal family of 3; 2 kids, 3 and 6.

Free section 8 housing 850 mo, feed taxes back in +350 =1200/mo

Medical(welfare) 3 people 150/mo, add taxes back in 50 for taxes =200/mo

Food stamps 350 mo, add taxes back in 425/mo

1200+200+425= 1,825/ mo FREE times 12= $21,900.00 free money a year to skip the border.
363 posted on 01/05/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox; RedBloodedAmerican
Okay...........as usual, I'm late to the party. What did I miss?
364 posted on 01/05/2002 1:31:30 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: 1st_Amendment
Read your own amendment again. "Congress shall make no law ..." Note that it doesn't say a THING about private enterprise!!!

This forum is NOT the United States Congress, and is NOT obligated constitutionally, morally, or legally to provide a vehicle for the dissemination of any views it does not approve. Period.

Your constitutional claim is as solid as Ted Kennedy's driving record.

As to our being "mindless sycophants," we gathered here because this site represented a harbor for conservatives. We can disagree on specifics, but we generally don't disagree on principle. And when we do, either we work it out or we ignore each other.

You, the conspiracy theorists, the Libertarian fanatics, the DU saboteurs, the trivialists, and the inane chatterers have no right whatsoever to post anything on this site. None. If Jim tells you to go, you go. And you have no recourse.

Before you try to mount a First Amendment argument for your imagined right to post here, you might try looking at the history of private property rights. It's more applicable in this case.

365 posted on 01/05/2002 1:31:38 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: lafayette76
You need a specialist.
366 posted on 01/05/2002 1:35:22 PM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Oh yeah, we all get banned here..... we all have a 15 second snapshot of our opinions. Well, of course, without referring to God.
367 posted on 01/05/2002 1:38:20 PM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
hmmmmmmmmmm no personal attacks.........looks like alot on here are doing just that.......why is it they can say what they want and he can't?
368 posted on 01/05/2002 1:39:09 PM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Okay...........as usual, I'm late to the party. What did I miss?

Seems as though Vigilant1 has got a beef with Jim Rob and doesn't like how he's been treated or something. Then, this other guy, a newbie as of today bumped me for some reason. I am too lazy to read his entire gripe.

If they don't like it then why stick around? I am sure there are plenty of sites out there with people who agree with them. I guess I am either confused or don't care and this is Saturday and I don't want to figure it all out. Sorry, I may not be of much help to you. All I know is I don't have a dog in this whatever it is.

369 posted on 01/05/2002 1:43:13 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Everybody go back to post 100 and remember what it's all about.
370 posted on 01/05/2002 1:43:17 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Arator
I bashed you and anyone else from FRU where and when Arator.....????????

You know me better than that!!!!

371 posted on 01/05/2002 1:47:41 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
HuH? He said what he wanted:
"Scary stuff. Censorship of ideas is a page right out of the NKVD, Stalin's secret police. I expect more from FreeRepublic. Looks like the NWO is everywhere. Time to find a discussion site that treats the first amendment better than toilet paper. Any suggestions?"
And he asked for suggestions. I made one. Looks like an honest exchange of ideas to me. Thanks, Jim
372 posted on 01/05/2002 1:47:56 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I think you pretty well summed it up. Malcontents, plain and simple.
373 posted on 01/05/2002 1:48:12 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I think you pretty well summed it up. Malcontents, plain and simple.
374 posted on 01/05/2002 1:49:05 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge;howlin;billie

375 posted on 01/05/2002 1:49:09 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Pay no attention to that woman behind the peroxide. :) hehehe
376 posted on 01/05/2002 1:50:46 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Cheers!!!!
377 posted on 01/05/2002 1:53:27 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
they will figure it out from the subject line
378 posted on 01/05/2002 1:55:17 PM PST by veryconernedamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The usual. Looks like santa didn't bring a life to some people this year.
379 posted on 01/05/2002 1:55:49 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1;Jim Robinson;John Robinson;Mudboy Slim
Is this the same Michael Rivero, that used to post on these threads and argue constantly on FLT 800 and other important issues?

If it is...he took a beating here, why do I sense sour grapes?

God Bless America, The Robinson Family, All Our Freepers And Our US Military!

380 posted on 01/05/2002 1:57:35 PM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 461-470 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson