Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Setting Sail on a Giant, Floating City (Super mile long ship holds 17,000 families!)
Foxnews.com ^ | 1/4/01 | michael y. park

Posted on 01/04/2002 6:51:07 AM PST by finnman69

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:32:01 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NEW YORK

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: finnman69
Notice all the pics show it in flat calm seas and under fair skies. I'm no sailor... maybe I'm just missing something. The thought of this monstrosity trying to round Cape Horn is, well, interesting to say the least. Perhaps some of our local Navy veterans can give us a nice, descriptive, first hand account of the weather down there.

AB

21 posted on 01/04/2002 7:23:03 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"the world's largest floating city"

Which is the world's second largest? The smallest? The first? etc...

Or, is this one all of those?

22 posted on 01/04/2002 7:25:38 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
$CAM????

Some questions.

1.) Will this ship like a condo/co-op/time-share or homeowners association?
2.) Whose civil and criminal laws will apply?
3.) How much of the ship will be set aside for producing drinkable water?
4.) How much of the ship will be set aside for waste treament facilities? Low rent district?

23 posted on 01/04/2002 7:25:58 AM PST by TOMH1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
yeah, I thought about Cape horn also. Tough trip for a monster like this. Maybe this thing can deploy helicopter rotor blades and fly over the Panama Canal. Does anyone remember S.H.I.E.L.D. from Marvel Comics and the S.H.I.E.L.D. helicarrier?
24 posted on 01/04/2002 7:28:54 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
And I present, the World's Biggest Terrorist target!

Unlike a real city, a few well-trained boarders could take her over.

25 posted on 01/04/2002 7:31:15 AM PST by Ada Coddington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LN2Campy
If their naval architecture is anything like their grammar, this hulk won't even make it out of the shipyard.

Just looking at it, it's far too top-heavy and too narrow to be able to sail in anything more than flat seas & light winds.

26 posted on 01/04/2002 7:33:01 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Most ideas like this have failed. A book called How to Start Your Own Country, now sadly hard to find and possibly out of print, details a large variety of these adventures.

The only one that could be considered a success was Sealand, and that had only about three citizens who took over an abandoned anti-aircraft platform near the UK and dubbed it a nation. Since it had about 1,100 square feet of living accomodations, roughly the same as a small house, it wasn't much of a country, so it could be safely ignored by the powers that be.

The most similar situation to this was L Ron Hubbard's Apollo, which roamed the seas in search of converts to his notorious Church of Scientology. He was run out of every country he visited, primarily because he tried to forment a Scientology revolution in most of them. This is surely precedent for others to be suspicious of anything even vaguely similar.

Finally, while it may have a middle class, I wonder about its lower class - the people who empty the wastebaskets and so on. How are they provided for? And what kind of economy will spring up?

It's a fascinating experiment. But I'd be surprised if it is ever successfully launched.

D

27 posted on 01/04/2002 7:37:28 AM PST by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
A big plus is that you could effectively set up your own government.
28 posted on 01/04/2002 7:42:49 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
My thought too. Interesting to see what happens when this "thing" gets in a real blow. With a flat bottom it will be out of control in any kind of wind.
29 posted on 01/04/2002 7:43:22 AM PST by Wagonmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I thought this was daffy too, until I learned about UK tax laws.

If a British subject can prove he's been out of their nation for a set number of days a year (more than 180, I believe), they pay NO UK TAXES.

A floating off-shore residence starts to makes sense *financially* to those blokes.

30 posted on 01/04/2002 7:44:32 AM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TOMH1
How 'bout:

5) The homeless?

31 posted on 01/04/2002 7:51:44 AM PST by bruin66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: finnman69, all
Why does everyone seem to think this ship is any more vulnerable than any other vessel? Remember the ULCCs that shrugged off the exocet missiles during the 80s?

Re icebergs- if those are such a threat, why aren't they sinking ships now? Gosh, I don't know...radar?

Re cape horn- if the weather is such a threat, why aren't ships breaking up right now?

Re a couple of boarders could take it over- well, given that the article mentions a a security force of 2,000, that seems unlikely.

Re: 20 foot waves in the north atlantic- anybody here a naval architect w/professional knowledge of the relationship between beam-length ratios, DWD, and sea keeping? I don't either, but then I'm not speculating about something I'm completely ignorant about...

This whole thing may be a cmoplete scam-I have no idea about the actual practicality of the project, either in terms of the technology or the business plan- but based on the comments I've seen, neither do a lot of the folks commenting.

33 posted on 01/04/2002 8:04:57 AM PST by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruin66
"How 'bout:
5) The homeless?"

You don't get on unless you have a bonifide account with lots of bucks/euros(?) in it. Go below a limit, then you get to play SURVIVOR in mid-ocean.

For menial level workers, genetically engineer chimpanzes.

34 posted on 01/04/2002 8:06:47 AM PST by TOMH1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

The S.H.I.E.L.D. helicarrier. More likely to be built than the Freedom Ship.

35 posted on 01/04/2002 8:08:28 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
This is pretty much one of the dumbest ideas I've ever seen.
36 posted on 01/04/2002 8:10:05 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
It's a hoax to draw very stupid investors.
37 posted on 01/04/2002 8:10:11 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
Actually its the same reason you don't seen monsters like Carnival Fun Ships rounding cape horn. They are built for calm water cruising. Only a few ships today like the QE2 are built for real transatlantic travel.
38 posted on 01/04/2002 8:12:07 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wagonmaster
My thought too. Interesting to see what happens when this "thing" gets in a real blow. With a flat bottom it will be out of control in any kind of wind.

With a flat bottom and that top profile, that baby's got some real windage problems. She'll also be constantly creeping sideways--in fact, all over the place if she's in any kind of seas/wind--until she broaches and over she goes--or one good gust broadside, even on flat seas, will do it. I don't think it'll take much to have her go over. I didn't see much about her underwater profile except the flat bottom, but without something biting deep into the sea, it's not going to be sailable. There aren't rudders deep enough or engines big enough to keep her stable, if that's all they're using to keep the ship stable--and having bow thrusters isn't going to keep this boat from stability because it's too top-heavy. With that much steel in her, it's a straight trip to the bottom once she starts going down. Did they think they'd be able to dazzle people by telling them what the displacement is and comparing it to a tanker without telling people what the obvious design flaws were?

I think some of my hubby's boat design & boatbuilding obsession is rubbing off my me (we're building our 2nd catamaran). He'll be so proud.

39 posted on 01/04/2002 8:12:27 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I'm sure Jesse Jackson and a bevy of class action lawyers are licking their chops right now.
40 posted on 01/04/2002 8:13:03 AM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson