Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
They might both diss Bush from time to time, but for very different reasons usually.

I always thougt it was possible that it was a "good cop" / "bad cop" kind of thing. Each of them peel away opposite sides of the Republican party and ultimately weaken the numbers of the party itself.

If one's goal was to benefit the opposition while pretending to be a disillusioned loyalist, the Kristol/Keyes tag team would be a perfect scam. Just a thought ???????

471 posted on 01/04/2002 8:27:25 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]


To: Southflanknorthpawsis
thougt=thought

Typos drive me nuts and I can't leave them alone if I catch it.........sorry

479 posted on 01/04/2002 8:32:54 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Miss Marple
I would think you would tire of trotting out the Keyes/Kristol conspiracy theory...there's a war on, we need to save the tinfoil for the scrap drives, ya know?

;-)

480 posted on 01/04/2002 8:35:02 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Well I don't think it was a conspiracy, although it may be both desired taking Bush down in some part of their brain. At most, it was a conscious parallelism (that is an antitrust law term). But the public stand at the end was a tepid support of Bush, even as Kristol, quite accurately as it turned out, thought that Bush would lose the popular vote by 1%.
483 posted on 01/04/2002 8:37:45 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson