[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

A lot of the Keyesters ARE bashing Bush, aren't they? :-)

No. MOST Keyes supporters here have been supportive of Bush both here and on other threads. Virtually all attacks here have been by you folks against Keyes, followed by attacks on you by his supporters, and your further attacks on the supporters. In fact these are classic disrupter techniques. As evidence, One can look up a number of Keyes threads, which you folks stayed out of, and there was virtually no flaming of Bush or anyone else, but instead there was rational discussion of issues. If you care to dispute this, please cite flaming of Bush on any Keyes thread where none of you folks showed up.

[Howlin]

No. MOST Keyes supporters here have been supportive of Bush both here and on other threads.

Would you be so kind as to point out ONE, just ONE, of ANY of those supportive posts by Keyes' people for George W. Bush, president of the United States?

We'll wait.

{{{Insert Jeopardy music here}}}

[Torie]

There is resentment by those who felt strongly that the election of Bush was a key national priority that Keyes' top priority was apparently not the election of Bush, after Bush secured the nomination. That resentment is understandable. Keyes has his own agenda, and I'm sure accepts the consequences. For myself, I accept Keyes being Keyes. He hasn't changed much over the years. What you see, is what you get. Some have a sort of perculiar anger that he didn't have an epiphaney, and assume some new personna and political role. Keyes is a hard wiring kind of guy. That hope or expectation was wholly unrealistic.