[Torie]

There is resentment by those who felt strongly that the election of Bush was a key national priority that Keyes' top priority was apparently not the election of Bush, after Bush secured the nomination. That resentment is understandable. Keyes has his own agenda, and I'm sure accepts the consequences. For myself, I accept Keyes being Keyes. He hasn't changed much over the years. What you see, is what you get. Some have a sort of perculiar anger that he didn't have an epiphaney, and assume some new personna and political role. Keyes is a hard wiring kind of guy. That hope or expectation was wholly unrealistic.

[Rowdee]

You don't often agree with Keyes, right? Have you noticed inconsistencies in him....is he all over the board dropping principles right and left....or is he as consistent as the sun risisng inthe east and setting in the west

Does it appear to you that his principles or morals are set down very deeply within him?