And by the way, while I refuse to account for what, if anything, CAL said or did or didn't say or didn't do, everytime this comes up it is always in the context (from y'all's side) that Keyes is just an angry, poor loser, poor campaigner, lousy ________ and just popped out with this comment that Bush was not intelligent or smart and that he would lose.
It's clear, not only by what you posted but what Miss M did, that he was saying this in the context of Bush not articulating the moral message....and then it came out about the study he did as well as the one that AU prof did about the WH not changing sides in ok economic times. So, it isn't as though he's just a blow hard, sore loser that is clearly attempting to be painted upon him.
Thank you in advance.