Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
But to deprive the faithful of the sacraments when they don't have to be would be objectively sinful, don't you think?

To change the almost ten-century old clerical requirement of celibacy because of short-term, largely phony vocations crisis would be worse.

189 posted on 01/06/2002 6:55:37 PM PST by st.smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: st.smith
To change the almost ten-century old clerical requirement of celibacy because of short-term, largely phony vocations crisis would be worse.

It's not a requirement.

Episcopalian and Lutheran men have converted to Catholicism, been ordained priests, and remained married.

If, as notwithstanding suggests, half the parishes are closed, and catholics are forced to drive miles to remote parishes, the faithful will have something to say about it, you can be sure.

Again, celibacy is not integral to the priesthood. If it were, we'd send the Episcopalian converts packing tomorrow.

And if the vocation crisis is phony, why are we welcoming these men into the Catholic Church and allowing them to practice?

191 posted on 01/06/2002 7:11:55 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson