Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FITZ
The costs to employers is low which is why they hire them or move the jobs elsewhere if possible. This is why markets are hated by would-be know-it-alls - they are unflinchingly honest about what people really value and how much they really value it.
634 posted on 01/02/2002 12:57:45 PM PST by garbanzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: garbanzo
Amen. Pass the Manchego, my friend.
636 posted on 01/02/2002 12:59:32 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

To: garbanzo
The costs to employers is low which is why they hire them or move the jobs elsewhere if possible. This is why markets are hated by would-be know-it-alls - they are unflinchingly honest about what people really value and how much they really value it.

In terms of manufacturing this is a well known myth, and is one of the reasons why relocating plants offshore has had mixed success. Labor as a percentage of manufacturing costs ranges around 15%, so at the most you might gain a 10% reduction in overall cost. Add in all the additional expenses of a broken supply chain, cultural problems, and other related issues, and often you actually end up losing money.

690 posted on 01/02/2002 2:06:46 PM PST by UberVernunft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson