Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carol-HuTex
I can speak from personal experience. In my pre-med years, it was easy to pick out in advance, with better than 90% accuracy, those who would perform the worst.

At Revelle College, UCSD, there was a requirement for a non-contiguous minor. Some of those people foolishly signed up for senior sequence biology classes. You could tell who they were when the prof posted the exam stats. The seniors had test scores ranging from 88 to 97...and the non-contiguous minors clustered from 63 to 66 (all 5 of them). I hung around with 3 other people on a regular basis in those classes. One of my group of 4 people always had the top score on any given exam in those classes. The points spread rarely exceeded 2 within the group. Even as a full classroom, the mean and standard deviation showed an exceptionally competitive group.

242 posted on 01/03/2002 12:24:34 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson