Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/21/2001 9:56:38 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf; doug from upland; dandelion; SocialMeltdown; Mercuria; Carol-HuTex; cribsheet...
ping
2 posted on 12/21/2001 9:57:37 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
As the ratio of low wage earners to high wage earners increases, so too does the rate at which the latter pay in extra taxes.
3 posted on 12/21/2001 10:03:57 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The Center for Immigration Studies had published lengthy, documented reports on this months ago!

CIS also published a thick, detailed booklet comparing pairs of otherwise-similar cities - with half being high-immigration cities that invariably came out as far worse off.

IMMIGRATION resource library - with public-health facts of immigration

4 posted on 12/21/2001 10:07:45 PM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
One of the reasons the median wages dropped was probably that there was a greater increase in the number of low income immigrants than in upper income folk...the median is the "middle" salary.) The average would be add and divide)

So, this statistic could mean that these counties have proportionately more low income workers that they did, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the higher incomes dropped (inflation adjusted)

It also means that some areas that used to be rich now probably have a much better supply of people to mow lawns, flip hamburgers, etc. But, social services, education, police departments, must be impacted by the influx. These rich counties can't have it both ways...maybe the silver lining here is that those who "benefit" from low income immigrants will see the objections most sane people have, now that it's impacting their own towns!

18 posted on 12/22/2001 12:29:01 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The general pattern is that immigrants in the last 10-15 years make much less than native born Americans, but that immigrants in the country longer than 15 years make MORE income than native born Americans. It's only temporary. Despite educational, language, cultural, and sometimes ethnic differences, most immigrants do very well in two decades. There are, of course, exceptions.
33 posted on 12/22/2001 1:05:42 AM PST by Hagrid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The Clinton fat hog is falling apart.
45 posted on 12/22/2001 1:53:38 AM PST by mbb bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
There is a good word for what's going on: third-worldization.
54 posted on 12/22/2001 9:29:08 AM PST by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
It is offical government policy to import cheap educated labor....Engineers....doctors....nurses....educators..

They will all work long hours for less money..this is part of the free trade open borders gift to big Business....

58 posted on 12/22/2001 1:06:18 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
BTTT
64 posted on 05/11/2002 3:21:41 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson