U.S. massing its troops near Iraq (20,000-plus soldiers moved to Kuwait, Qatar)

National Post ^ | 12/20/01 | Michael Higgins

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

i am all for setteling old scores, i'm sure the family's of the marines who were drapped through the streets of that litter box will not agree with you at all.

How about a US city wasted by an Iraqi weapon? If Bush has a plan for handling Iraq, GO MAN GO!

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

The domino effect. Now we have the Big Mo on our side. If Bush goes to war with the Bath party, then it is Taliban Times Two. Then the target rich environment. It works against them. Demoralising them is much easier than the Taliban. Their faith in their hardware, a security blanket easilly yanked away form them, compared with faith in the ability to hide in caves.

[FreedomPoster]

Mr. Annan said, "It would be unwise to attack Iraq now." He said there is no proof Baghdad was connected to the Sept. 11 attacks.

Like Coffee has every bit of information that our people do? Right.

This is the best signal yet that going after Iraq would be the appropriate next move. If Coffee is agin' it, I'm for it.

[sinkspur]

I think London's been hit by every terrorist group there is, except for maybe the Red Army out of Japan.

On the scale of 9/11?

Hardly.