Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. massing its troops near Iraq (20,000-plus soldiers moved to Kuwait, Qatar)
National Post ^ | 12/20/01 | Michael Higgins

Posted on 12/21/2001 5:36:33 AM PST by truthandlife

More than 20,000 American troops have been moved into Qatar and Kuwait in a possible sign the United States is shifting its focus on terrorism to Iraq.

Also yesterday, the Czech parliament approved a plan to send up to 400 anti-chemical warfare and medical troops to help the United States. It is believed some of the troops could be sent to Kuwait.

Analysts say stationing troops in Kuwait, where similar Czech units fought during the Gulf War, is a signal the campaign is shifting from Afghanistan and might be broadened to include Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein.

The United States moved the headquarters of its 3rd Army to Qatar two weeks ago and defence analysts have reported large numbers of troops being moved into the region since.

The 3rd Army is the ground component of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees America's military operations in the Middle East and Afghanistan and was in charge of coalition forces during the Gulf War.

The Pentagon has insisted it is merely rotating troops but defence analysts say about 24,000 troops have been moved in with barely a brigade, about 4,000, moving out.

The warning signs prompted Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations, to caution that attacking Iraq would only exacerbate tensions in the Middle East.

Mr. Annan said, "It would be unwise to attack Iraq now." He said there is no proof Baghdad was connected to the Sept. 11 attacks.

Iraq has constantly been touted as a possible target because of its harbouring of terrorists as well as its refusal to allow UN inspectors back into the country to check for chemical or nuclear weapons.

Colin Powell, the U.S. Secretary of State, is devising a long-term plan aimed at forcing Iraq to readmit UN weapons inspectors and abide by a set of economic sanctions. Officials say if the Iraqi leader refuses, they do not rule out using military force.

Mr. Annan acknowledged yesterday that Iraq had made no moves to allow UN weapons inspectors back into the country.

Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister, yesterday pledged full support for the United States if the next stage of the anti-terrorism campaign involves action against another country.

"We will of course be a very staunch ally of the United States, but whenever I'm asked about these other countries, phase two of this operation will involve other actions against international terrorism, but in respect of each there will be a process of deliberation and consideration before we act," Mr. Blair said. "Because we have shut down the al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan, it doesn't mean it is shut down around the world."

However, Bulent Ecevit, the Turkish Prime Minister, said yesterday his country opposes making Iraq the next target. He said he would raise the issue in a Jan. 16 meeting with George W. Bush, the U.S. President. Turkey has strongly backed the campaign to bring suspected terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network to justice, but warned Washington against extending the war to its southern neighbour Iraq.

Other possible targets for stage two of the U.S. campaign include Somalia, Yemen and Sudan.

In Brussels, General Richard Myers, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, acknowledged Somalia is a potential target but indicated action might not necessarily be military.

"There are ... countries that worry us because they actively support and harbour [terrorists]. It's one thing to have a cell in your country, it's another to actively support them," he said.

Donald Rumsfeld, the U.S. Defence Secretary, said on Tuesday Somalia had hosted al-Qaeda leaders in the past. He said Yemen and Sudan were also known to harbour active al-Qaeda cells.

"The only way to deal with a terrorist network that is global is to go after it where it is," said Mr. Rumsfeld. He added the alliance should "prepare now for the next war." Yesterday Mr. Rumsfeld said a senior German official was "flat wrong" when he said the United States had marked war-ravaged Somalia as its next target.

Meanwhile, Abdi Guled Mohamed, the Somali Transport Minister, said yesterday the government wants to be an ally of the United States in the war on terrorism. Somalia is home to the Al-Itihaad al-Islamiya, or "Islamic Union," a fundamentalist group that has been linked to al-Qaeda.

On the other side of the Gulf of Aden, Yemen yesterday sent special army troops led by the son of its president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to search for Muslim militants linked to bin Laden in what was believed to be a bid to pre-empt any U.S. strike. The action was taken a day after clashes killed at least 18 people from both sides.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: angcat
i am all for setteling old scores, i'm sure the family's of the marines who were drapped through the streets of that litter box will not agree with you at all.

How about a US city wasted by an Iraqi weapon? If Bush has a plan for handling Iraq, GO MAN GO!

21 posted on 12/21/2001 9:04:59 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The domino effect. Now we have the Big Mo on our side. If Bush goes to war with the Bath party, then it is Taliban Times Two. Then the target rich environment. It works against them. Demoralising them is much easier than the Taliban. Their faith in their hardware, a security blanket easilly yanked away form them, compared with faith in the ability to hide in caves.
22 posted on 12/21/2001 9:11:32 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Mr. Annan said, "It would be unwise to attack Iraq now." He said there is no proof Baghdad was connected to the Sept. 11 attacks.

Like Coffee has every bit of information that our people do? Right.

This is the best signal yet that going after Iraq would be the appropriate next move. If Coffee is agin' it, I'm for it.

23 posted on 12/21/2001 9:22:15 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Documentary Lady
I think London's been hit by every terrorist group there is, except for maybe the Red Army out of Japan.

On the scale of 9/11?

Hardly.

24 posted on 12/21/2001 12:01:07 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson