U.S. Senate candidate released from Denver jail after act of civil disobedience

Stanley for U.S. Senate 2002 ^ | December 17, 2001 | n/a

[LibertyRocks]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 17, 2001

NEWS RELEASE & MEDIA ADVISORY

Stanley for U.S. Senate
Web site - http://www.stanley2002.org
Contact: Michelle Konieczny,
Campaign Office: 303.329.0481
Email: michelle@stanley2002.org

===========================================================

Stanley Released from Jail; Charged with Violating an Unconstitutional Gun-Control Ordinance

(DENVER, CO) Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate, Rick Stanley, was released from Denver Police custody on Sunday, December 16, 2001, at approximately 3:30 PM, after being charged with violating a local gun-control ordinance. Stanley contends the law he is charged under violates his civil rights and he will be seeking a jury trial to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional. Second Amendment supporter Duncan Philp was also arrested and faces an identical charge.

Stanley and Philp were arrested by the Denver Police, Saturday, December 15, 2001, shortly after noon, upon performing a planned act of civil disobedience by openly carrying a loaded handgun in a holster upon their hip, during a Bill of Rights rally being held in Denver's Lincoln Park. Both Stanley and Philp, stated their actions were an attempt to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article II Section 13 of the Colorado Constitution. They are now facing one count each of unlawfully carrying a deadly weapon in violation of Denver's Revised Municipal Code, 38-117.5(b).

Paul Grant, a civil rights attorney who will be representing both men is optimistic about their chances in court. On Saturday Grant stated, "There's absolutely no way a judge should be able to uphold Denver's ordinance in light of the state constitution". Public support and attention would be an essential part of the case, said Grant who has argued cases on several different occasions before the Supreme Court. He urged all supporters to attend these men's court dates and to speak out publicly on this issue explaining that; "Jurors must realize how important this case is".

Mr. Stanley's next court date is Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 8:30 AM, Courtroom 151P, in the County Courts Building located at 1437 Bannock Street in Denver. Supporters are requested to pack the courtroom that morning.

-----------------------------------------------------------

MEDIA ADVISORY:

The Stanley for U.S. Senate campaign will be holding an informal press conference on Monday, December 17, 2001, at 6:00 PM. All members of the media are invited to attend to learn more about the case, and this candidate for U.S. Senate who is truly different from all the rest. The conference will be held at the campaign office located at 6280 E.39th Avenue in Denver. For directions please call the campaign office at 303.329.0481. Mr. Stanley is also available for personal interviews by calling the same number.

##30##

[Aric2000]

No matter who says it, it is the truth, if you let one persons rights get trampled on, sooner or later, yours will be too. It's a fact of government, you give them an inch, they take 2000 miles....

[clamper1797]

I've noticed that when either you or I post to VA he takes off ... no response. Cockroaches hate light

[VA Advogado]

If you support dope/dopers I can certainly understand why you feel this way.

[VA Advogado]

I certainly stand by that statement. Why would anyone stand up for the right to use/deal/produce illegal drugs? Those people should be crushed. There is nothing in the constitution that gives dope/dopers special standing. Unless you follow a different version than normal America.

[VA Advogado]

Please use a larger font. Perhaps something with dripping blood. It has a greater effect on the masses.

[clamper1797]

I would feel that way drugs or not .... oh and in case you hadn't noticed so do most people out here.

[Dead Corpse]

Do stay on topic - If you are going to post an article, make sure you are placing it in the correct topic area. Do include the original title - When you post an article, be sure to include the original title where appropriate. This helps users find the article and lessens the chance of a double post.
Posting Guidelines

Would you like to return to the topic please?

[VA Advogado]

"I have no problem with Jack booted thugs 

when they're used against the right people."

--VA Advogado, American Patriot

[VA Advogado]

Would you like to return to the topic please?

Indeed I would.

[Dead Corpse]

So maybe you can answer the Qeustion that I posted to Dane. Forget for a momment that this guy was a Libertarian. For the sake of argument, think of him as a Republican. Would you still disapprove of the measures he is taking to try and force the Courts to strike down laws infringing the Second Amendment?

[VA Advogado]

Would you still disapprove of the measures he is taking

Absolutely. He's doing a disservice to all second amendment advocates, regardless of what party banner he runs under.

[Dead Corpse]

So you disagree the the Courts are the proper venue for determining the Constitutionality of a Law?

Where else should a citizen turn to get an UnConstitutional Law repealed? The Legislature can change laws through amendment and add laws. The Excutive cannot repeal them, only administer them. It is only through the Judicial system that UnConstitutional laws can be striken down.

If you know of some other mechanism in the Constitution, please enlighten us.

[tacticalogic]

"I have no problem with Jack booted thugs when they're used against the right people." I believe that was the same thread you advocated summary execution by hanging for all "druggies".

In 1921, a bootlegger named Carbine Williams had his still raided and a Deputy Sheriff was killed in the ensuing gun battle. He received a 20-30 sentence in a federal prison. Should they have just hung him on the spot instead? This was during prohibition, when posession or manufacture of any alcohol was a federal crime.

[VA Advogado]

So you disagree the the Courts are the proper venue for determining the Constitutionality of a Law?

In fact I do. However, you need not act like an ass, put on a dog & pony show, and get arrested to have a constitutional issue ajudicated by the courts.

[VA Advogado]

In 1921, a bootlegger named Carbine Williams had his still raided and a Deputy Sheriff was killed in the ensuing gun battle.

If he was a reason why the deputy was killed he should have been hanged immediately after his conviction.

[Zon]

I have no problem with Jack booted thugs when they're used against the right people. In this case, law breaking druggies are the right people. No mercy, no peas.

8 posted on 12/13/01 4:50 AM Pacific by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[tahiti]

"These types of people (Badnarik and Stanley) have courage and we need to support their efforts in challenging the constitutionality of various statutes, codes, and ordinances."

My fear for them and myself is, as I initiate my civil disobedience in airports that have "federalized" employees violating my 4th amendment rights:

The Patriot Act of 2001

SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM

`(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--

`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

`(B) appear to be intended-- `(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; `(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

Will the Denver U.S. attorney get involved with Mr. Stanley's civil disobedience?

[tpaine]

Does the version of the constitution you use have a prohibition amendment against 'some' mind altering substances?

You claim to honor the constitution, and don't even know it, or understand it.