Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Senate candidate released from Denver jail after act of civil disobedience
Stanley for U.S. Senate 2002 ^ | December 17, 2001 | n/a

Posted on 12/17/2001 2:33:37 AM PST by LibertyRocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-408 next last
To: tpaine
No matter who says it, it is the truth, if you let one persons rights get trampled on, sooner or later, yours will be too. It's a fact of government, you give them an inch, they take 2000 miles....
321 posted on 12/17/2001 1:49:11 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

Comment #322 Removed by Moderator

To: tpaine
I've noticed that when either you or I post to VA he takes off ... no response. Cockroaches hate light
323 posted on 12/17/2001 2:03:33 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
If you support dope/dopers I can certainly understand why you feel this way.
324 posted on 12/17/2001 2:05:05 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I certainly stand by that statement. Why would anyone stand up for the right to use/deal/produce illegal drugs? Those people should be crushed. There is nothing in the constitution that gives dope/dopers special standing. Unless you follow a different version than normal America.
325 posted on 12/17/2001 2:06:50 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Please use a larger font. Perhaps something with dripping blood. It has a greater effect on the masses.
326 posted on 12/17/2001 2:07:50 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
I would feel that way drugs or not .... oh and in case you hadn't noticed so do most people out here.
327 posted on 12/17/2001 2:11:11 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Do stay on topic - If you are going to post an article, make sure you are placing it in the correct topic area. Do include the original title - When you post an article, be sure to include the original title where appropriate. This helps users find the article and lessens the chance of a double post.
Posting Guidelines

Would you like to return to the topic please?

328 posted on 12/17/2001 2:18:52 PM PST by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"I have no problem with Jack booted thugs 

when they're used against the right people."

--VA Advogado, American Patriot

329 posted on 12/17/2001 2:18:59 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Would you like to return to the topic please?

Indeed I would.

330 posted on 12/17/2001 2:20:15 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
So maybe you can answer the Qeustion that I posted to Dane. Forget for a momment that this guy was a Libertarian. For the sake of argument, think of him as a Republican. Would you still disapprove of the measures he is taking to try and force the Courts to strike down laws infringing the Second Amendment?
331 posted on 12/17/2001 2:23:26 PM PST by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Would you still disapprove of the measures he is taking

Absolutely. He's doing a disservice to all second amendment advocates, regardless of what party banner he runs under.

332 posted on 12/17/2001 2:27:07 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
So you disagree the the Courts are the proper venue for determining the Constitutionality of a Law?

Where else should a citizen turn to get an UnConstitutional Law repealed? The Legislature can change laws through amendment and add laws. The Excutive cannot repeal them, only administer them. It is only through the Judicial system that UnConstitutional laws can be striken down.

If you know of some other mechanism in the Constitution, please enlighten us.

333 posted on 12/17/2001 2:33:29 PM PST by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
"I have no problem with Jack booted thugs when they're used against the right people." I believe that was the same thread you advocated summary execution by hanging for all "druggies".

In 1921, a bootlegger named Carbine Williams had his still raided and a Deputy Sheriff was killed in the ensuing gun battle. He received a 20-30 sentence in a federal prison. Should they have just hung him on the spot instead? This was during prohibition, when posession or manufacture of any alcohol was a federal crime.

334 posted on 12/17/2001 2:37:46 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
So you disagree the the Courts are the proper venue for determining the Constitutionality of a Law?

In fact I do. However, you need not act like an ass, put on a dog & pony show, and get arrested to have a constitutional issue ajudicated by the courts.

335 posted on 12/17/2001 2:53:03 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
In 1921, a bootlegger named Carbine Williams had his still raided and a Deputy Sheriff was killed in the ensuing gun battle.

If he was a reason why the deputy was killed he should have been hanged immediately after his conviction.

336 posted on 12/17/2001 3:03:24 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
I have no problem with Jack booted thugs when they're used against the right people. In this case, law breaking druggies are the right people. No mercy, no peas.

8 posted on 12/13/01 4:50 AM Pacific by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

337 posted on 12/17/2001 3:08:06 PM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

Comment #338 Removed by Moderator

To: BillofRights
"These types of people (Badnarik and Stanley) have courage and we need to support their efforts in challenging the constitutionality of various statutes, codes, and ordinances."

My fear for them and myself is, as I initiate my civil disobedience in airports that have "federalized" employees violating my 4th amendment rights:

The Patriot Act of 2001

SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM

`(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--

`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

`(B) appear to be intended-- `(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; `(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

Will the Denver U.S. attorney get involved with Mr. Stanley's civil disobedience?

339 posted on 12/17/2001 3:20:32 PM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Does the version of the constitution you use have a prohibition amendment against 'some' mind altering substances?

You claim to honor the constitution, and don't even know it, or understand it.

340 posted on 12/17/2001 3:25:26 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson