[clintonh8r]

Let's see....would an "anarchy club" have officers, by-laws, a meeting place, meeting times, etc? Doesn't the very concept of a "club" imply the exact opposite of anarchy? All in all, just another dumb kid who uh, like, "sucks".

[homeschool mama]

LOL!

[NJJ]

Losers have the right to form clubs too.

[NC_Libertarian]

Anarchy is anti-authority, not necessarily anti-organizational.

[gfactor]

actually no. you're making a common mistake, which is to confuse anarchy with chaos and disorganization. In fact, most anarchists believe in quite organized -- but not regimented societies, with no rulers. and most importantly, with relations between people based on just that -- that they are people, rather than on how much power they have, be it public (ie, they're a cop, DA, president etc..) or private (your boss, the only employer/store in town, a major campaign contributor etc..). So it seems as if its you who is uninformed, but no longer, so no more excuses.

[brewcrew]

Doesn't the very concept of a "club" imply the exact opposite of anarchy?

I love unintended oxymorons, and you've found one! Good job!

It's like one of the quotes I have on my bulletin board: "Remember that you're unique, just like everyone else."