Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A village is destroyed. And America says nothing happened
The Independent ^ | 12.04.01 | Richard Lloyd Parry

Posted on 12/04/2001 9:53:48 AM PST by truth4all

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last
To: Byron_the_Aussie
I have Muslim kids in my Cub Scout pack. And they are good kids and they come from good families. And their fathers get up in the morning, pull their pants on one leg at a time, and wonder what's for breakfast just like you and I do.

So did the Nazi death-camp guards.

I'm sure the Muslim families you know are good to their kids and all that. My question is: how many were boiling mad at the people who took out the WTC on 9/11. More importantly, if they had good reason to believe that a fellow Muslim was planning a terrorist attack, would most of them call up the FBI to report him, or would they instead feel religiously bound to not give up a fellow Muslim to the "infidels".

141 posted on 12/09/2001 2:13:46 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
...well, our side does not usually specifically target innocent civilians....

Of course we don't. And I don't believe for one minute that those bombs were dropped deliberately.

What I am arguing against is all the people here who say it's okay if they were.

142 posted on 12/09/2001 2:18:51 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
...more importantly, if they had good reason to believe that a fellow Muslim was planning a terrorist attack, would most of them call up the FBI to report him, or would they instead feel religiously bound to not give up a fellow Muslim to the "infidels"....

That's a good question. And the only answer can be, 'I don't know.' My guess is that most would, and that Al-Qaeda kept the operational planning just as much a secret to Muslims as they did for anyone else. From what I have seen, first-hand, most Muslims don't spend every waking moment thinking about how they're going to destroy the Great Satan. Is it an essential part of 'victory' to demonise everyone of that faith?

I've been reading a book on the Revolutionary War recently, Redcoats and Rebels. General Washington believed that if you didn't have right, and God, on your side, and conduct yourself according to a set of principles, there was no point in even taking up arms. I think that still holds.

143 posted on 12/09/2001 2:29:57 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: truth4all
boo hoo hoo!
144 posted on 12/09/2001 2:32:26 PM PST by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
We whacked some of our own guys and injured a bunch of others in a bombing mission recently. This sort of thing happens in war. The trick is keeping it to a minimum.
145 posted on 12/09/2001 2:44:04 PM PST by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
What I am arguing against is all the people here who say it's okay if they were.

OK, but another thing these dirt bags like to do, is put military targets inside, or next to schools, hospitals and things like that. They are sneaky too.

146 posted on 12/09/2001 2:45:45 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
I'm talking about an assumed connection between your repeated complaints about the images I posted, and the overnight disappearance of same, plus warnings to me from the moderator.

If those assumptions were wrong, I apologise to you.

Well the assumptions are wrong. I restate that I have never whined to anybody at Free Republic about what anybody else has posted in my entire time here. I've never even hit the Abuse button. If I have a problem with what somebody posts, I will address it publicly by responding to the individual on the relevant thread as I did in this case. No "pings" to Jim Robinson or to any sidebar monitors. Perhaps one of them saw my reply to you and used that as a basis to remove the images I took offense to, but that would have been their decision. I never asked anybody to remove them.

Anyway, apology accepted.

147 posted on 12/09/2001 2:46:11 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Click here please

Thank you.

148 posted on 12/09/2001 3:35:32 PM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
" General Washington believed that if you didn't have right, and God, on your side, and conduct yourself according to a set of principles, there was no point in even taking up arms. I think that still holds."

Have you ever taken up arms - and pursued an armed enemy - that wanted you dead?

I would be interested to learn what "set of principals" George Washington considered appropriate for his time and his war. They may or may not be applicable in whole in our time. I doubt if George ever contemplated the weapons, enemy mentality or war conducted against civilian population centers we face in today's world.

Generalizing about the virtues of "honorable" war making - is best left to the Priests and War Crimes Judges. There is nothing "honorable" about war. It demeans and destroys those involved. Only the FR keyboard "warriors" see romance, heroics and swashbuckling honor in war. The real world warrior had best concentrate on accomplishing his mission and staying alive at the same time. One mistake, one hesitation, one reckless act can get you killed in an instant - and you stay dead, forever. Tends to keep you focused and vicious.

We send clear eyed, fresh young men into situations - that change them into hardened and bitter warriors looking for revenge. They find their brothers butchered alive and left for them to find. They find entire villages brutalized by the enemy they have been following/chasing for weeks. Can you not imagine the acts of war that take place - once these two opposing forces finally can not escape one another and must each fight to kill one another?

Men at war become something else. Much can be found to criticize - but your voice on this matter would perhaps sound a little less offensive if you had been there and were not guilty.
Semper Fi

149 posted on 12/09/2001 10:41:30 PM PST by river rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
this stuff about my mother being a comfort woman is showing an ugliness in your soul that won't look too good by the harsh light of day.

I never said your mother was a comfort woman for the Japanese Imperial Army, I am certain she is a fine woman.

My point was that without the USA saving Oz in WW2, Aussie lasses WOULD have been FORCED to become a comfort ladies of the victorious Japs. And the thanks we get is your sniveling. BTW, are you aware that in war, civilians get killed? For example, during the 3 month war called the Battle of Okinawa, more civilians died than at Hiroshima? They called it "the Steel Typhoon". Do we regret their deaths? Of course. Do we regret winning the war? Not one little bit. Ask 75 year old Aussie women if they would have enjoyed working in Japanese Army brothels instead.

And, since you raised the issue, we have an excellent relationship with the People's Republic of China. You're the guys they're challenging.

Yeah sure, keep telling yourself that.

Just remember, to the Chinese and Indonesians, Australia looks as empty and ready for colonizing and settling as America looked to the British French and Spanish in 1500.

Like I said, learn Chinese, and go for a front desk job dealing with PLA officers.

150 posted on 12/09/2001 10:54:58 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Yeah, boy, those Russians sure taught those Japanese a lesson, didn't they? Oh, wait a sec...
151 posted on 12/09/2001 11:02:27 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
"I have Muslim kids in my Cub Scout pack. And they are good kids and they come from good families. And their fathers get up in the morning, pull their pants on one leg at a time, and wonder what's for breakfast just like you and I do."

Could you not say exactly the same thing about "good Germans" in 1942 or "good Soviet Communist Party members" in 1950?

Does that excuse the evil of their fanatical jihad mentality, and the horror it is bringing from the Philippines to Indonesia to (insert the next ten nations here) to New York?

152 posted on 12/09/2001 11:03:03 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Apparently there was enough left for a pacifist journalist to clearly identify part of it stuck in roof thatching.
153 posted on 12/09/2001 11:08:32 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Of course we don't. And I don't believe for one minute that those bombs were dropped deliberately.

What I am arguing against is all the people here who say it's okay if they were.

Well that settles it! I think that our gang believes you are arguing against the war in general. I'm sure all of us agree that it definitely AIN'T ok to bomb innocents! ;) Now that that's out of the way, why don't we all settle in for a foot-stompin' game of fizbin!

154 posted on 12/09/2001 11:24:18 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie; Mark17
...well, our side does not usually specifically target innocent civilians.... (Mark17)

Of course we don't. And I don't believe for one minute that those bombs were dropped deliberately.

What I am arguing against is all the people here who say it's okay if they were. (Byron the Aussie)

**********************************************

In Afghanistan, the strategic targets we are after are not ball bearing factories, oil refineries, or railyards.

In Afghanistan, the target is the leadership of Al Qaida and the Taliban. They are the strategic target, the head of the snake which bit us on 9-11. We are out to kill as many of them as possible before the end of hostilities, to deter future 9-11s.

To that end, we will bomb any hotel (like the one where we killed OBL lieutenant M. Atef) or village where intell puts a significant part of them.

When we targeted the ball bearing plants in Germany, sometimes we hit the town of Schwieinfurt's civilians. That's war.

Today, if the Al Qaida and Taliban leadership wants to hide in a remote hotel, and we find it, we are going to blow it up, and I regret the loss of the civilians who lived there also. The same goes for the village in this story. I believe that the truth is that it was possibly targeted if we saw (via UAVs etc) a collection of enemy leaders there. (Meaning nice SUVs and pickups, or reports from spies). So we may have hit it, intentionally, going after the Al Qaida or Taliban leadership.

I am sorry, but they are the "ball bearing factories" of this war. If they want to spare civilian casualties, they need to stop hiding next to women and children. It's a war, and they will be targeted when we find them. If they choose to hide next to women and children, that's on them.

Remember what I said about Okinawa: more civilians died in the crossfire than died at Hiroshima. Do you wish that instead, we had allowed the Japs to win WW2?

Remember, in every nation where the Japanese Imperial Army marched in victorious, they kidnapped the young girls to be forced prostitutes for their brutal troops, servicing as many as 20 a day.

So when you spit on America because our bombs do not fall perfectly, keep in mind that it was even more imperfect bombs which kept your Aussie lasses from being forced to service a victorious Japanese Imperial Army.

Just keep that in mind when you compare the Americans to Nazis.

And next time, when you need to be saved again, forget it.

Just learn Chinese instead. No innocent lives will be lost fighting back against a Chinese invasion, you'll just surrrender, I have no doubt.

It'll be too bad for your young girls though.

155 posted on 12/09/2001 11:41:30 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

Comment #156 Removed by Moderator

To: Squantos; harpseal; sneakypete; B4Ranch; gonzo; Thorn11cav
Good thread.
157 posted on 12/10/2001 12:13:50 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #158 Removed by Moderator

To: Pharmboy
Thanks, Pharmboy.

Not relevant to the discussion here, but very poignant and moving nonetheless.

159 posted on 12/10/2001 1:09:44 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
...does that excuse the evil of their fanatical jihad mentality...

They don't have a 'fanatical jihad mentality', Trav. They're just kids. Good Cubs, too.

I think we all know who's showing the fanatical mentality on this thread, bud.

160 posted on 12/10/2001 1:12:31 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson