Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WANTED! Please post any information you have about 'rat FRAUD in Houston mayoral race
me

Posted on 12/02/2001 1:19:18 PM PST by GOPcapitalist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last
To: ConsistentLibertarian
I was sort of wondering the same about you, but I don't get any mileage out of personalizing these things. Best to stick to the issues. It's the simplest possible request and you keep dancing around it.

You would serve yourself better to repeat that while facing a mirror, as you have directly personalized this by taking personal shots at other posters by name. Similarly, you have all but completely avoided the content of my posts in which I have patiently attempted to answer your purported concerns (though in later responses I have admittedly expressed my disapproval of your attitude as a result of my more than reasonably patient position toward you wearing thin). And of those responses you acknowledge, I have seen nothing but what appear to be intentional and selective distortions of the written record aimed at no other purpose than drawing attention to yourself by demonstrating just how much of an anal retentive snot you can be. Fortunately, most freepers are intelligent enough to see through your ilk which makes me wonder exactly what you see yourself to be gaining by coming here in the first place.

Oh well, at least you keep the rest of us entertained.

121 posted on 12/02/2001 3:56:32 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
You've posted in this thread so much and said so little. Maybe you should follow the thread from a distance and quit playing Freeper Psychologist.
122 posted on 12/02/2001 4:00:58 PM PST by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Austim
A difference of 1.4% separates the candidates. In many communities, that is enough to trigger an automatic recount.

Combine with that allegations of illegal voters and no one even needs to determine when the ballot boxes were stuffed (if that even happened). Just eliminate enough dead, non-Houston citizens, and similar from the voting list and the election could toggle the other way.

123 posted on 12/02/2001 4:02:01 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
The fact that your wife or girlfriend doesn't get home from her office Christmas party until 4 A.M. isn't evidence of any wrongdoing either, but wouldn't you want to know where she had been and what she had been doing?
124 posted on 12/02/2001 4:14:26 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
Five thousand votes? I doubt there was much fraud involved. That is getting to be a tired excuse for loosing elections. Look at the bright side. When Houston bankrupts, it will get blamed on a dem not at rep.
125 posted on 12/02/2001 4:15:16 PM PST by chouli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Who needs the rail now that Enron won't be able to hold up the stadium? Probably just stop all the downtown construction and leave it all in a mess.
126 posted on 12/02/2001 4:19:20 PM PST by chouli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: weegee
The new electronic machines will bring pluses and a few minuses to the system. My main concern is a lack of paper trail, BUT I must say that of all the electronic options, the one they chose came closest to placating this concern of mine by far.

The machines are extremely secure and leave little possibility of problems from the lack of a paper trail, simply because each record is duplicated. Each of the individual machines records the vote internally, while also sending it into a second memory storage in a central unit. It also records the time, so votes cast after the election is supposed to be closed will be flagged. The machine must be literally opened up inside through tamper resistant seals to get to the memory card, so any fraud will be detected that way.

The touch screen thing is often thought of as a convenience, but trust me - the wheel is better ballot security wise. Touch screens on computers must be calibrated, and a single calibration error (intentional or not) could end up casting votes for the wrong person, whereas the wheel will always turn to whoever is being selected.

127 posted on 12/02/2001 4:19:46 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: chouli
five thousand votes in a runoff election where more votes were cast than in the general. That itself is unheard of. And yes, five thousand votes could easily be fraudulent considering that they came almost entirely from an area where turnout was abnormally higher than anywhere else in the city, which is even more unusual considering that turnout was so high all around.
128 posted on 12/02/2001 4:23:34 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: chouli
They wont give up on the olympics
129 posted on 12/02/2001 4:25:26 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
True, the calibration needs to be kept up but the voter has to approve their choices before hitting the "vote ballot now" confirmation.

I would still like to see an alphanumeric entry rather than the wheel. It is good to hear of some of the security measures involved to safeguard the electronic ballot box.

130 posted on 12/02/2001 4:26:55 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist; Gracey
As GOPcap and I have already discussed, I was the judge in a rather small leftist precinct yesterday. There were rules being broken by the leftists time after time. Unfortunately, I couldn't control everything as I was busy helping idiots who had no idea where they were supposed to vote and trying to challenge the others who were told to do a Challenge Affidavit by the Brown brigade, headed up by ultra leftist State Rep. Debra Danburg.

These leftists don't let rules and regulations get in the way of their election day fun. Since I saw what I saw as a Republican in a Leftist precinct, I can't imagine what was going on in a Leftist precinct with no Republicans around and in precincts with much heavier turnout than we had in ours.

Gracey and I were talking in last nights thread about the problems in the voting system and how there have to be some major overhauls. I can't offer many solutions, but I can certainly describe what I'm seeing on the front lines and try to get some attention paid to it.

131 posted on 12/02/2001 4:27:17 PM PST by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
I thought the same thing, it seems a last minute late return from the black precincts put Brown over the top. Same trick pulled in Florida with the last minute Palm Beach county turn ins.

This is the "same trick" pulled in virtually every big city in the US.

132 posted on 12/02/2001 4:40:02 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
If the margin of victory had been larger, would that have been evidence that the election was clean?

It would have been an indication that, as was most likely the case in the Hillary Clinton Senate race, the massive fraud was ultimately unnecessary.

Hope this helps.

133 posted on 12/02/2001 4:41:50 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Actually, you're equivocating between "evidence" and "proof". Evidence comes in degrees, proof doesn't. And to ask about reasons for believing X is to ask what evidence there is to believe X. That's why we can talk about dispositive reasons, prima facie reasons, compelling reasons, slight reasons, etc. You get those variations in degree because evidence comes in degrees.

Glad you cleared that one up for me.

134 posted on 12/02/2001 4:43:24 PM PST by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: BUSHdude2000
I can't imagine what was going on in a Leftist precinct with no Republicans around and in precincts with much heavier turnout than we had in ours.

Your images were turning into reality...they were casting votes for people who "forgot" to vote.

Some one or two elections ago, "darth" watched the polls in a Democrat precinct from 7 to 7... He said few came to vote, but at the end of the day, many hundreds had voted. Interesting. And interesting that 110% of voters seem to turn out in some Democrat precincts across the country for presidental elections... very interesting.

It took GUTS for you to be a precinct judge in a leftist precinct. You served us well, BushDude. I'll drink to you and GOPCapitalist. You guys are great. Thanks for caring. (tears have been shed for Sanchez and our flawed political process)

135 posted on 12/02/2001 4:44:05 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
You mean Gracey and GOPcapitalist? Dunno. You'd think they'd be jumping at the chance to document the evidence in a public forum.

This is GOPcapitalist's statement in his opening post: I am calling on any and all freepers with information pertaining to ballot fraud in yesterday's Houston mayoral race to post it here and now.

Sounds to me like they're looking for an explanation on some hunches they have received, including my own problems in a polling place yesterday.

136 posted on 12/02/2001 4:47:35 PM PST by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
It would have been an indication that, as was most likely the case in the Hillary Clinton Senate race, the massive fraud was ultimately unnecessary.

You said a mouthfull there...It deserves to be repeated.

137 posted on 12/02/2001 4:48:05 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: BUSHdude2000; GOPcapitalist; ConsistentLibertarian
Glad you cleared that one up for me.

ConsistentLibertarian is just like those Democrats who took your time to sign the "Challenge Affidavit's." It's a digression tactic to gain attention and throw one off track, when in reality there's no concern for the subject.

I'd say this guy's a leftist troublemaker, here in disguise. He has not answered one question posed to him by me.

138 posted on 12/02/2001 4:48:09 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: *Vote Fraud
Bumping to Vote fraud list
139 posted on 12/02/2001 4:52:47 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
I posted this in last nights thread and think it amplifies what you were just saying about people who "forgot" to vote.

I was told last night when I was at the Sanchez campaign HQ, that a few years ago a Republican poll watcher followed the election judge to the tabulation center after the polls were closed. The election judge made several trips around 610 while the poll watcher stayed right behind him...when they counted the ballots, the election judge miraculously had 70 more ballots than he did when he left the polling place.

140 posted on 12/02/2001 4:52:51 PM PST by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson