Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tony in Hawaii
"Will somebody more patient than I am please explain the X in "Xmas"? "

Pure laziness!

170 posted on 11/27/2001 6:38:42 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: sweetliberty
This is from www.snopes.com:

Claim:   'Xmas' is a modern, disrespectful abbreviation of the word 'Christmas.'

Status:   False.

Origins:   The abbreviation of 'Xmas' for 'Christmas' is neither modern nor disrespectful. The notion that it is a new and vulgar representation of the word 'Christmas' seems to stem from the erroneous belief that the letter 'X' is used to stand for the word 'Christ' because of its resemblance to a cross, or that the abbreviation was deliberately concocted "to take the 'Christ' out of Christmas." Actually, this usage is nearly as old as Christianity itself, and its origins lie in the fact that the first letter in the Greek word for 'Christ' is 'chi,' and the Greek letter 'chi' is represented by a symbol similar to the letter 'X' in the modern Roman alphabet. Hence 'Xmas' is indeed perfectly legitimate abbreviation for the word 'Christmas' (just as 'Xian' is also sometimes used as an abbreviation of the word 'Christian').

None of this means that Christians (and others) aren't justified in feeling slighted when people write 'Xmas' rather than 'Christmas,' but the point is that the abbreviation was not created specifically for the purpose of demeaning Christ, Christians, Christianity, or Christmas -- it's a very old artifact of a very different language.

Last updated:   21 December 1999

184 posted on 11/27/2001 7:00:45 PM PST by Tony in Hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson