[mgist]

All those claims are nothing compared to the corruption at presididential levels during Clinton's term. I never read anything that even sounded like a complaint about that administration from the Boston Herald. Now all of the sudden they are concerned about corruption? Puleeze, now they're all trying to pretend they are OReilly.

[Landru]

"All those claims are nothing compared to the corruption at presididential levels during Clinton's term. I never read anything that even sounded like a complaint about that administration from the Boston Herald. Now all of the sudden they are concerned about corruption? Puleeze, now they're all trying to pretend they are OReilly."

BWAHAAAAAA!!!
Did you nail this, or what?

That the sycophant, quisling media, & especially this RAG, are screaming & wringing their hands about *corruption* (of any kind,) now??
Why this is so ludicrous one MUST be careful not to be caught standing too close to this imbecile Maggie Mulvihill.
Lest one risk getting hit with a bolt of lightening not intended for anyone but her.

Oh this, "is" funny!!

[Excuse_Me]

All those claims are nothing compared to the corruption at presididential levels during Clinton's term. I never read anything that even sounded like a complaint about that administration from the Boston Herald. Now all of the sudden they are concerned about corruption? Puleeze, now they're all trying to pretend they are OReilly.

That was the Boston Globe. The Herald had numerous anti-Clinton articles. They are not a bad paper editorially.

[MissAmericanPie]

Heyyy, don't discourage them, there is no better journalist to imitate than O Reilly.