Replies

"All those claims are nothing compared to the corruption at presididential levels during Clinton's term. I never read anything that even sounded like a complaint about that administration from the Boston Herald. Now all of the sudden they are concerned about corruption? Puleeze, now they're all trying to pretend they are OReilly."

BWAHAAAAAA!!!
Did you nail this, or what?

That the sycophant, quisling media, & especially this RAG, are screaming & wringing their hands about *corruption* (of any kind,) now??
Why this is so ludicrous one MUST be careful not to be caught standing too close to this imbecile Maggie Mulvihill.
Lest one risk getting hit with a bolt of lightening not intended for anyone but her.

Oh this, "is" funny!!

That the sycophant, quisling media, & especially this RAG, are screaming & wringing their hands about *corruption* (of any kind,) now??

Don't know about Mulvihill, but the Herald is a fair paper editorially, especially for Boston. Maybe you're thinking of the Globe?

this imbecile Maggie Mulvihill

Whoa there.

See post #7 I think you may have confused the Boston Herald with the Boston Globe, the NY Times weak sister Mary.

As for Maggie she's anything but an imbecile (except of course if you happen to be a knuckle dragging fan of thugs like Mawn)and has done a ton of reporting on this corrupt FBI office from the legal angle-she's an attorney.