GAY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

gaywire press releases ^ | 25 NOV 2001 | Kevin Ivers, Log Cabin Republicans Director of Public Affairs

[RobertBauman]

Nice try. You homosexual activist types seem to come up with a new clever angle every day. I've had this runaround with you before. If anyone disagrees with your Clintonite agenda of social engineering, suddenly they're a big bad 'homophobe'. Sorry, but most normal people don't support you effort to have flamboyent homosexuals in the military or mock marriages or all the rest. In America, you have the right to pursue whatever agenda you want, but just be honest about it. You team up with homosexual DemoRATS and suddenly it's 'bipartisanship' to 'support families of terror victims'. Give me a break. What you're supporting is the same old song and dance of setting the stage for homosexual marriage. After Sept 11th, you militant gay types suddenly hoped to silence any opposition by just saying "We're in a crisis, we can't afford to oppose anything like homosexual recruitment in schools, gay sex in the military, homosexual marriage rights, etc... We need to stand together". Sorry, but the American public isn't dumb enough to buy that. Once and for all admit that your so-called homophilic philosophy has the sole purpose of normalizing your lifestyle by acheiving special legislation for homosexual men who practice sodomy (or the AIDS lifestyle if you will). Be honest for once. Now go and file your complaint with Jim because someone dared disagree with your lifestyle choice.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

To allow an institution of homosexual marriage in a monogamous form requires some sort of moralistic meandering to justify it and prohibit any form of polygamy. Upon what basis, if we are to assume it is discrimminatory to not allow homosexuals to "marry," can there be a prohibition of the varying forms of polygamy? Especially, since the First Amendment is specific in forbidding an establishment of religion in the law and is supposed to protect the people's right to assemble peaceably? The entire issue of "same-sex" marriage hinges upon the assumption that monogamy is the only form of marriage. I contend that it is based upon human biological reproduction and is outside of the government's authority to regulate in regard to the First Amendment...

[RobertBauman]

"Note, he has named himself after a congressman who was vitriolically anti-gay"

Already been there, done that. It has been brought up before. IT'S MY NAME - DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT? Are you a homosexual rugby player just because you call yourself 'Ruggers' and post on any thread that exposes something negative about the gay lifestyle? Just curious.

[RobertBauman]

Why do you patrol every thread and the second someone questions your lifestyle they suddenly get banned for being a 'homophobe'? Is it your utmost goal to pursue the normalization of sodomy as a lifestyle by attempting to numb the American public to what you do? Sorry, but most people still don't consider homosexual men sexually penetrating other men and boys to be "just another alternative lifestyle". How exactly do you expect to strengthen the Republican Party by trying to normalize a lifestyle that is at least unhealthy if not deadly? You defend homosexual militancy every chance you get and it's looking kind of freaky: What has happened to Free Republic

[RobertBauman]

Uh... want to explain to us why you BUMP me when you post this drivel, if you ain't a troll, "Bobby?"

When did I ever bump you? It sounds like you are getting paranoid. In all seriousness I don't care what you do in private or what gender(s) you do it with, but when you homosexual militant types try to change our whole society by legitimizing some kind of mock marriage out of two males trying to impregnate each other, it surpasses any sense of decency. Why don't you try to fly that stuff over at DU where you came from? I have a feeling they would just love it.

[Kevin Curry]

And if they weren't "gay" they wouldn't have done it?

There are probably closet pedophiles donating to the families, too. Should they annouce their perversion publicly in the hope of gaining acceptance on account of the support they have provided?

The New Gay Motto: "I'm a real swell guy. If you will love me, you must love my perversion. After all, I am my perversion."

[blake6900]

Why don't you two conduct your "pissing contest" somewhere else? What is it with newbies anyway?

[RobertBauman]

By acting in unison, we hope to demonstrate that the questions we raise are concerns that surpass politics," said Tafel. What a clever ploy to build a concensus of acceptibility. Next they'll be having a 'national gay walk-old-ladies-accross-the-street day."

BINGO! Since when does ignoring morals and values become more important than honoring them? When this Tafel guy says that homosexual rights 'surpass politics' he sounds more and more like Bill Clinton.

[bribriagain]

"INFERIOR DESACRATORS, DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS"

You've got a point there.

[Jimbaugh]

Click the banner above to see what has been going on for years.
There is a homosexual plan and it is working.

I have a few stories at leavethekidsalone.com that usually end these kind of threads.