Replies

One thing we DO know is that ChaseR and BeAChooser must not have ANYBODY to spend the holidays with, eh? Why else would they have had so much time on their hands over the holiday?

See above.

You'd think Larry would reward their faithful devotion with a turkey dinner, at least.

It would be interesting to see what Web Pacer has on the court document regarding this. Nothing on larr's web site and you know it would be blasted with press releases, etc.

#252 LOL. BeAChooser has waaaay too much time on his hands, and if he was as lonely over the holidays as he is on FR, well.....'nuf said.`Now, I suppose I'll be blessed with several gems from BeAC; can hardly wait. ;-)

ROFL!!!

One thing we DO know is that ChaseR and BeAChooser must not have ANYBODY to spend the holidays with, eh? Why else would they have had so much time on their hands over the holiday?

I understand they're all going over Miss Print's for cookies and to open their homemade Christmas subpoenas.

One thing we DO know is that ChaseR and BeAChooser must not have ANYBODY to spend the holidays with, eh? Why else would they have had so much time on their hands over the holiday?

As usual, you are wrong. You don't have the FACTS. I spent the holidays with my and my wife's family. Bet I ate more turkey and fixen's than you!

But can I help it if I keep getting a nagging suspicion that you aren't what you claim? You don't believe Ron Brown was murdered. You think those of us who do or that Vince Foster didn't die as the government claimed give the GOP a "bad name". You don't seem to believe Linda Tripp. You don't think ANY of Klayman's cases ever had merit. In fact, you recently indicated that you didn't even think there was anything to Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate (or I suppose the rest of the "gates"). You sure don't sound like a conservative to me.

You wouldn't happen to have come up with a better reason for not believing Brown was murdered than that lame reason you gave the last time we talked. You remember ... when you challenged me to prove (and I did) that families of the Brown victims received up to 14 Million dollars EACH? You latched on to the PRESS STATEMENT of the DEMOCRAT (Sheilla Jackson Lee) who cited the 14 Million figure and her recittal of the conclusions from the Brown crash Accident Investigation report.

But why couldn't you answer any of the questions I asked about that report, Howlin? As I said, the Accident Board is supposed to produce a report that can be used in any legal proceedings that might follow a crash. If that's the case, why do you suppose the report makes NO MENTION of the pathologist statements AT THE EXAMINATION that Brown appeared to have a bullet wound in his head? Don't you think a lawyer in any post crash suits might want to know such information? Why do you suppose the report makes no mention of the fact that pathologists AT THE EXAMINATION were calling for an autopsy because they suspected a bullet wound ... but were denied one (as it turns out) on orders from the WHITEHOUSE and JCS? Wouldn't family lawyers want to know that sort of information? Why doesn't this report even MENTION that x-rays suggested a lead snowstorm in Brown's head? Why does it describe the wound in a manner that both photos and eyewitness testimony CLEARLY dispute? Does it even mention the missing beacon at the airport, Howlin? Does it mention that the maintenance officer in charge of that beacon died within a few days of the crash, before he could be interviewed and in a rather unusual "suicide"? Does it mention that both the AWACS and airport lost contact with the plane's transponder when it was still 8 miles from the crash site? It doesn't mention a lot of the FACTS in the case, DOES IT?

I'll ask you again. Do you know that the families of the victims ... even Brown's family ... didn't know about ANY of these FACTS until YEARS after the crash, when some of the military people at AFIP went public and Ruddy published their statements? Howlin, how do you explain the LIES by the management at AFIP about the crash evidence and the opinions of their own expert pathologists? You can't ... so you RUN. How do you explain the FACT that regulations prohibit cabinet officers and (I suppose) First "Ladies" from flying on airplanes without black boxes ... yet the plane that crashed, ACCORDING TO THE ADMINISTRATION, had no black boxes even though it not only carried Brown but the Secretary of Defense and Hillary just weeks before the crash? How do you explain the AFIP cremating the one admitted survivors body BEFORE family members were even notified of the death (another violation of regulations)? How do you explain the OFFICIAL government timeline that indicates there were TWO survivors? How do you explain Abe Sockowitz (friend of John Huang, Chinese SPY) being at the crash site in time to be the one who FIRST reported the second survivor when he (we found out years later) just HAPPENED to miss the ill-fated flight? No, Howlin ... neither you or any of the rest of you have answers to these questions. You RUN from them, just like democRATS ALWAYS do when confronted by facts that they can't spin or that threaten their party.

BTW, did you ever contact Sheila Jackson Lee's office ... or was that just MORE hot air?