1 posted on
11/19/2001 7:59:49 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
In time of true war, an American president becomes something close to a dictator. This is as more due to public sentiment than to any other factor. The public correctly recognizes that committtees and deliberative bodies are not well suited to the quick decisions needed in such times of emergency. The question is whether such emergency procedures are continued after the end of the war.
So far, America has had a reasonably good record of reverting to less executive-dominant methods of governance between wars.
2 posted on
11/19/2001 8:16:24 PM PST by
Restorer
To: Pokey78
Now, in the views of many scholars, Bush has restored the "Imperial Presidency," a term Arthur Schlesinger Jr. used to describe Richard M. Nixon's administration in 1973.I wonder if Dana Milbank expressed such concerns about Clinton's abuse of Executive Orders. Somehow I doubt it.
17 posted on
11/20/2001 7:39:08 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: Pokey78
Someone needs to seize power from Congress and the judicial branch. We are at war, and this is no time to play around with partisan politics like the dems in congress keep trying. Whiney article, WP.
The President of the US is constitutionally the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces, therefore these decisions are his, and he should be able to make them.
To: Pokey78
the link goes nowhere - has it been pulled?
26 posted on
01/21/2006 11:05:53 AM PST by
p23185
(Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson