Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Hides And Alters Documents For Previous Presidents
Pravda ^ | November 17, 2001 | Timothy Bancroft

Posted on 11/17/2001 9:11:28 AM PST by Red Jones

11:30 2001-11-17

BUSH PERFORMS COSMETIC SURGERY

Clinical alterations to a law giving the public the right to access official files in effect protects the country's administrations, past and present, from the public eye. President George Bush has approved an order which makes it more difficult to get access to the documents relating to the activity of ex-presidents. Under the US Constitution, by the 1978 Presidential Registry Act, these documents belong to the US citizens but the alterations approved by George Bush will enable officials to stall and impede revelation of sensitive material.

The Presidential Registry Act was brought in after Watergate, to make the US Presidency appear more transparent. The original idea was that documents related to the presidency would be accessible to the public 5 years after the president left office, and the more sensitive documents, 12 years after.

The 68,000 documents of the Reagan Administration (Ronald Reagan was President for eight years between 1984 and 1992, George Bush Senior was his Vice President) were due to become public in January, 2002. However, the White House had previously declared that it needed more time to handle the growing number of requests to view the documents and the order signed by George Bush makes it extremely difficult to gain access to them.

Under the new order, either the President to whose term in office the documents refer, or the serving President, have the right to revise the documents before they are made public. There is no time limit for this

revision period and the party who requested access to the documents will have to take the case to court if he wants the process to move faster.

The White House claims that this "simple complements na organised process", according to Alberto Gonzales, advisor to the White House who prepared the order signed by George Bush. Critics declare that this order was made to save George Bush Senior from embarrassing revelations.

Either way, those who suffer will be historians and researchers who will in this way be deprived of material which does not pose a threat to national security.

The US Congress has the right to propose a law to overturn the order.

Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY

PRAVDA.Ru


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: concerned about politics
earth to concerned about politics ... ... earth to concerned about politics ... ...

Lew Rockwell is a noted journalist among the American conservatives. He is hated by American liberals. You're claiming that he's a communist and you look ridiculous.

41 posted on 11/17/2001 10:49:19 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
Hey Wiley, good film. Clinton is laughing first.
The guy is dead and out of the Travelgate investigation. Hillary is scott free.
But of course when the rapist sees the camera, well, the crocodile tears flow.

Great film!!!!

42 posted on 11/17/2001 10:49:58 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
PRAVDA.Ru editorial staff
Gorshenin
Vadim
Editor-in-chief
E-mail
Novikova
Inna

English version editor,
deputy editor-in-chief E-mail

Ovchinnikov
Alexey
System administrator, programmer
E-mail
Zholobov
Andrey
Programmer
E-mail
Liskov
Dmitry
Commentator
E-mail
Litvinovich
Dmitry
Commentator
E-mail
Lubensky
Andrey
Correspondent in Cherkassi, Ukraine
   E-mail
Gorobetz
Alexandr
Correspondent in Kiev, Ukraine
   E-mail
Bancroft Hinchey
Timothy
Correspondent in Lisbon 
E-mail

43 posted on 11/17/2001 10:51:37 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY hates the NATO, America, and just about anything Western. If you don't believe it just do a Google search for his name and read his articles. His articles appear in such reputable websites as Anti-Imperialist League - Peace and Resistance. Consider the source.
44 posted on 11/17/2001 10:52:31 AM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
earth to concerned about politics ... ... earth to concerned about politics ...

Thank you, and earth to knee-jerkers and the loud and uninformed, too. People will take one look at the article, decided it is trash for one reason or another (it's coming from Pravda, the article sounds like leftist trash, etc).

No one takes the time to think, "If this is true, let's see if I can find it reported anywhere else." Such as previous FR articles!

Well, whatever, a lot of people disregard things like this. And that's the worst part. Don't forget that everything is somehow "justified" in the name of fighting terrorism.

Some people question everything, but most people question nothing.

45 posted on 11/17/2001 10:58:20 AM PST by jiggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones; All
Pravda, Schmavda...

The important thing in this is that we will lose our right to open government, which is one of the keystones of liberty. As far as presidents altering historical documents Nixon did : remember the 18 minute gap in the tapes? That incident probably was what inspired the 1978 law.

Is there some reason that we can't have an honest government? The papers from the Reagan presidency, if released, will apparently cause a lot of damage to both Bush Sr. and W. Why else is Bush fighting this?

(Re: the "gap": whas it 18 minutes or 18 seconds? I forgot.

46 posted on 11/17/2001 10:58:21 AM PST by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY hates the NATO, America, and just about anything Western. If you don't believe it just do a Google search for his name and read his articles. His articles appear in such reputable websites as Anti-Imperialist League - Peace and Resistance. Consider the source.

It doesn't matter who the author is, what matters is the order is true. Consider the truth.

47 posted on 11/17/2001 11:01:04 AM PST by jiggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: deport
thanks for pointing out that the author of this piece is on the Pravda staff and lives in Portugal.

Thanks also for showing us that the New York Times and the AP carried similar stories recently. The Pravda journalist merely got it from them.

48 posted on 11/17/2001 11:03:01 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
I don't like it either. I don't like the insinuation that he has to hide documents because he has cabinet members from his Dad's and Reagan's era.
49 posted on 11/17/2001 11:03:07 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
well, can't any old jack ass like you or me get on the Pravda forum and say anything they want; Just because someone says something there, it means very little. People can say anything they want on FR also, that doesn't mean that the FR web site stands for that.
50 posted on 11/17/2001 11:07:12 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IceCreamSocialist
Lets see some evidence he has altered ONE document.

You can't, he's made them all secret, along with the courts.

We seem to be getting close to tinfoil territory.

51 posted on 11/17/2001 11:11:20 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Aerial
Here is the EO

Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001 Further Implementation of the Presidential Records Act

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures implementing section 2204 of title 44 of the United States Code with respect to constitutionally based privileges, including those that apply to Presidential records reflecting military, diplomatic, or national security secrets, Presidential communications, legal advice, legal work, or the deliberative processes of the President and the President's advisors, and to do so in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), and other cases, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Definitions.

For purposes of this order:

(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.

(b) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.

(c) "Former President" refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.

Sec. 2. Constitutional and Legal Background.

(a) For a period not to exceed 12 years after the conclusion of a Presidency, the Archivist administers records in accordance with the limitations on access imposed by section 2204 of title 44. After expiration of that period, section 2204(c) of title 44 directs that the Archivist administer Presidential records in accordance with section 552 of title 5, the Freedom of Information Act, including by withholding, as appropriate, records subject to exemptions (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(8), and (b)(9) of section 552. Section 2204(c)(1) of title 44 provides that exemption (b)(5) of section 552 is not available to the Archivist as a basis for withholding records, but section 2204(c)(2) recognizes that the former President or the incumbent President may assert any constitutionally based privileges, including those ordinarily encompassed within exemption (b)(5) of section 552. The President's constitutionally based privileges subsume privileges for records that reflect: military, diplomatic, or national security secrets (the state secrets privilege); communications of the President or his advisors (the presidential communications privilege); legal advice or legal work (the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges); and the deliberative processes of the President or his advisors (the deliberative process privilege).

(b) In Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, the Supreme Court set forth the constitutional basis for the President's privileges for confidential communications: "Unless [the President] can give his advisers some assurance of confidentiality, a President could not expect to receive the full and frank submissions of facts and opinions upon which effective discharge of his duties depends." 433 U.S. at 448-49. The Court cited the precedent of the Constitutional Convention, the records of which were "sealed for more than 30 years after the Convention." Id. at 447 n.11. Based on those precedents and principles, the Court ruled that constitutionally based privileges available to a President "survive[] the individual President's tenure." Id. at 449. The Court also held that a former President, although no longer a Government official, may assert constitutionally based privileges with respect to his Administration's Presidential records, and expressly rejected the argument that "only an incumbent President can assert the privilege of the Presidency." Id. at 448.

(c) The Supreme Court has held that a party seeking to overcome the constitutionally based privileges that apply to Presidential records must establish at least a "demonstrated, specific need" for particular records, a standard that turns on the nature of the proceeding and the importance of the information to that proceeding. See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 713 (1974). Notwithstanding the constitutionally based privileges that apply to Presidential records, many former Presidents have authorized access, after what they considered an appropriate period of repose, to those records or categories of records (including otherwise privileged records) to which the former Presidents or their representatives in their discretion decided to authorize access. See Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. at 450-51.

Sec. 3. Procedure for Administering Privileged Presidential Records.

Consistent with the requirements of the Constitution and the Presidential Records Act, the Archivist shall administer Presidential records under section 2204(c) of title 44 in the following manner:

(a) At an appropriate time after the Archivist receives a request for access to Presidential records under section 2204(c)(1), the Archivist shall provide notice to the former President and the incumbent President and, as soon as practicable, shall provide the former President and the incumbent President copies of any records that the former President and the incumbent President request to review.

(b) After receiving the records he requests, the former President shall review those records as expeditiously as possible, and for no longer than 90 days for requests that are not unduly burdensome. The Archivist shall not permit access to the records by a requester during this period of review or when requested by the former President to extend the time for review.

(c) After review of the records in question, or of any other potentially privileged records reviewed by the former President, the former President shall indicate to the Archivist whether the former President requests withholding of or authorizes access to any privileged records.

(d) Concurrent with or after the former President's review of the records, the incumbent President or his designee may also review the records in question, or may utilize whatever other procedures the incumbent President deems appropriate to decide whether to concur in the former President's decision to request withholding of or authorize access to the records. (1) When the former President has requested withholding of the records:

(i) If under the standard set forth in section 4 below, the incumbent President concurs in the former President's decision to request withholding of records as privileged, the incumbent President shall so inform the former President and the Archivist. The Archivist shall not permit access to those records by a requester unless and until the incumbent President advises the Archivist that the former President and the incumbent President agree to authorize access to the records or until so ordered by a final and nonappealable court order.

(ii) If under the standard set forth in section 4 below, the incumbent President does not concur in the former President's decision to request withholding of the records as privileged, the incumbent President shall so inform the former President and the Archivist. Because the former President independently retains the right to assert constitutionally based privileges, the Archivist shall not permit access to the records by a requester unless and until the incumbent President advises the Archivist that the former President and the incumbent President agree to authorize access to the records or until so ordered by a final and nonappealable court order.

(2) When the former President has authorized access to the records:

(i) If under the standard set forth in section 4 below, the incumbent President concurs in the former President's decision to authorize access to the records, the Archivist shall permit access to the records by the requester.

(ii) If under the standard set forth in section 4 below, the incumbent President does not concur in the former President's decision to authorize access to the records, the incumbent President may independently order the Archivist to withhold privileged records. In that instance, the Archivist shall not permit access to the records by a requester unless and until the incumbent President advises the Archivist that the former President and the incumbent President agree to authorize access to the records or until so ordered by a final and nonappealable court order.

Sec. 4. Concurrence by Incumbent President.

Absent compelling circumstances, the incumbent President will concur in the privilege decision of the former President in response to a request for access under section 2204(c)(1). When the incumbent President concurs in the decision of the former President to request withholding of records within the scope of a constitutionally based privilege, the incumbent President will support that privilege claim in any forum in which the privilege claim is challenged.

Sec. 5. Incumbent President's Right to Obtain Access.

This order does not expand or limit the incumbent President's right to obtain access to the records of a former President pursuant to section 2205(2)(B). Sec. 6. Right of Congress and Courts to Obtain Access.

This order does not expand or limit the rights of a court, House of Congress, or authorized committee or subcommittee of Congress to obtain access to the records of a former President pursuant to section 2205(2)(A) or section 2205(2)(C). With respect to such requests, the former President shall review the records in question and, within 21 days of receiving notice from the Archivist, indicate to the Archivist his decision with respect to any privilege. The incumbent President shall indicate his decision with respect to any privilege within 21 days after the former President has indicated his decision. Those periods may be extended by the former President or the incumbent President for requests that are burdensome. The Archivist shall not permit access to the records unless and until the incumbent President advises the Archivist that the former President and the incumbent President agree to authorize access to the records or until so ordered by a final and nonappealable court order.

Sec. 7. No Effect on Right to Withhold Records.

This order does not limit the former President's or the incumbent President's right to withhold records on any ground supplied by the Constitution, statute, or regulation.

Sec. 8. Withholding of Privileged Records During 12-Year Period.

In the period not to exceed 12 years after the conclusion of a Presidency during which section 2204(a) and section 2204(b) of title 44 apply, a former President or the incumbent President may request withholding of any privileged records not already protected from disclosure under section 2204. If the former President or the incumbent President so requests, the Archivist shall not permit access to any such privileged records unless and until the incumbent President advises the Archivist that the former President and the incumbent President agree to authorize access to the records or until so ordered by a final and nonappealable court order.

Sec. 9. Establishment of Procedures.

This order is not intended to indicate whether and under what circumstances a former President should assert or waive any privilege. The order is intended to establish procedures for former and incumbent Presidents to make privilege determinations.

Sec. 10. Designation of Representative.

The former President may designate a representative (or series or group of alternative representatives, as the former President in his discretion may determine) to act on his behalf for purposes of the Presidential Records Act and this order. Upon the death or disability of a former President, the former President's designated representative shall act on his behalf for purposes of the Act and this order, including with respect to the assertion of constitutionally based privileges. In the absence of any designated representative after the former President's death or disability, the family of the former President may designate a representative (or series or group of alternative representa-tives, as they in their discretion may determine) to act on the former President's behalf for purposes of the Act and this order, including with respect to the assertion of constitutionally based privileges.

Sec. 11. Vice Presidential Records.

(a) Pursuant to section 2207 of title 44 of the United States Code, the Presidential Records Act applies to the executive records of the Vice President. Subject to subsections (b) and (c), this order shall also apply with respect to any such records that are subject to any constitutionally based privilege that the former Vice President may be entitled to invoke, but in the administration of this order with respect to such records, references in this order to a former President shall be deemed also to be references to the relevant former Vice President.

(b) Subsection (a) shall not be deemed to authorize a Vice President or former Vice President to invoke any constitutional privilege of a President or former President except as authorized by that President or former President.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant, limit, or otherwise affect any privilege of a President, Vice President, former President, or former Vice President.

Sec. 12. Judicial Review.

This order is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party, other than a former President or his designated representative, against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

Sec. 13. Revocation.

Executive Order 12667 of January 18, 1989, is revoked.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

November 1, 2001.

52 posted on 11/17/2001 11:13:29 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
thanks for clueing me in on this author's anti-American bent. But I'm only concerned with the facts he mentions, not his opinion. The New York Times and the AP published similar articles 2 weeks ago and links on this thread let you see those articles.

I know Reagan wouldn't go for this. I do not want fascism in America, that is my motivation.

We've seen the federal government do some terrible things under George HW Bush and Bill Clinton. Bush is moving to give us a sanitized history for very good reason from the perspective of those who wish to rule us. But this is very bad for the cause of freedom in America.

53 posted on 11/17/2001 11:15:58 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
Sorry folks. I'm sure this will break your hearts, but I think you're wearing tin foil again.

It's a major conspiracy! The sky is falling! America is doomed!

This will turn out to be a non- event.

I'd vote for Bush again with no problem.

Sometimes during war, a man goota do what a mans gotta do.

Maybe later they can lift the order- when the war is over and the lunitics settled down.

I'm sure the left would do anything to screw up this war, and all we need is the liberal press helping them .

So, go on with your conspiracy and one world evil take over stuff.

Have fun.

54 posted on 11/17/2001 11:19:21 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
you want to know what pathetic is ... ... pathetic is claiming that conservative Lew Rockwell is a communist, that's pathetic.

we need people who love America and what it stands for, not Republican/Bush cheerleaders.

55 posted on 11/17/2001 11:20:38 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Aerial
Here is the old EO...I dont see anything that says alter in either one.

Executive Order 12667--Presidential Records

Source: The provisions of Executive Order 12667 of Jan. 16, 1989, appear at 54 FR 3403.

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of Executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this Order:

(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.

(b) "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.

(c) "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act of 1978 (Pub. L. No. 95-591, 92 Stat. 2523-27, as amended by Pub. L. No. 98-497, 98 Stat. 2287), codified at 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.

(d) "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act. 53 Fed. Reg. 50404 (1988), codified at 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.

(e) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act and the NARA regulations.

(f) "Former President" refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.

(g) A "substantial question of Executive privilege" exists if NARA's disclosure of Presidential records might impair the national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the Executive branch. (h) A "final court order" is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.

Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records.

(a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, utilizing any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of Executive privilege. However, nothing in this Order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke Executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of Executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period. If a shorter time period is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President.

(a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other Federal agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of Executive privilege is justified.

(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of Executive privilege is not justified. The Archivist shall be promptly notified of any such determination.

(c) If after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of Executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.

(d) If the President decides to invoke Executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates. After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.

Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.

(a) Upon receipt of a claim of Executive privilege by a former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other Federal agencies as he deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this Order that Executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the former President's claim of privilege.

(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

Sec. 5. Judicial Review. This Order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Executive branch and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

56 posted on 11/17/2001 11:23:35 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jiggity
on this thread there is a link to two articles; One by New York Times and one by AP; These two articles came out 2 weeks ago and say the same thing as this one. Also, person in #52 or so put out the entire Executive Order that bush made; You can read it yourself and make up your mind.
57 posted on 11/17/2001 11:26:02 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
......I dont see anything that says alter in either one.......

A word search for "alter" doesn't produce it either except in the Title and the word alternate. My guess is the writer is trying to use an interpretation of English and means the EO altered the previous rules/regs/laws.... just a guess on that.

58 posted on 11/17/2001 11:34:33 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: deport
I reviewed the EO as put there on this link and didn't that word 'alter' either. The journalist from pravda used that word. The NYT article and the AP article linked to in this thread did not.
59 posted on 11/17/2001 11:41:02 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
I'm sorry, I don't understand your post. It is the Bush administration that is providing the coverup not the Clinton administration. It seems to me that GWB is far worse than Clinton in this respect.
60 posted on 11/17/2001 11:41:25 AM PST by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson