Posted on 11/17/2001 9:11:28 AM PST by Red Jones
11:30 2001-11-17
BUSH PERFORMS COSMETIC SURGERY
Clinical alterations to a law giving the public the right to access official files in effect protects the country's administrations, past and present, from the public eye. President George Bush has approved an order which makes it more difficult to get access to the documents relating to the activity of ex-presidents. Under the US Constitution, by the 1978 Presidential Registry Act, these documents belong to the US citizens but the alterations approved by George Bush will enable officials to stall and impede revelation of sensitive material.
The Presidential Registry Act was brought in after Watergate, to make the US Presidency appear more transparent. The original idea was that documents related to the presidency would be accessible to the public 5 years after the president left office, and the more sensitive documents, 12 years after.
The 68,000 documents of the Reagan Administration (Ronald Reagan was President for eight years between 1984 and 1992, George Bush Senior was his Vice President) were due to become public in January, 2002. However, the White House had previously declared that it needed more time to handle the growing number of requests to view the documents and the order signed by George Bush makes it extremely difficult to gain access to them.
Under the new order, either the President to whose term in office the documents refer, or the serving President, have the right to revise the documents before they are made public. There is no time limit for this
revision period and the party who requested access to the documents will have to take the case to court if he wants the process to move faster.
The White House claims that this "simple complements na organised process", according to Alberto Gonzales, advisor to the White House who prepared the order signed by George Bush. Critics declare that this order was made to save George Bush Senior from embarrassing revelations.
Either way, those who suffer will be historians and researchers who will in this way be deprived of material which does not pose a threat to national security.
The US Congress has the right to propose a law to overturn the order.
Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY
PRAVDA.Ru
The newspaper Pravda and the website Pravda.ru are not related, other than the fact they're both Russian and called Pravda.
The newspaper Pravda has had a long, strange career as a Communist house organ (if you'll excuse the expression). The website is not affiliated with it (though some of the contributors to the site used to work for the paper).
"Great!", some of you will say, "He's a Republican". ....not so fast, a Democrat will land back in that office sooner or later.
I get a tear in my eye when I think of the damage of this executive order, along with Ashcroft's assault on the 4th amandment.
People, WAKE UP! Be wary of Government. Democrat or Republican. Period.
Would you really want Slick Willie to have the ability to alter documents? Would you have wanted Richard Nixon to have that ability? I am sure all kinds of shenanigans have gone on in the Office of the President from the very beginning of our country...even JFK..
according to the PRAVDA 'forum', www.freerepublic.com "bans" articles from PRAVDA?
Gee........isn't that interesting?
As someother posters said above, it's New World Order, it's not an American way to do things. Only Republican cheerleaders, other dupes and truly evil people support this.
The Internet periodical PRAVDA On-line was registered by the RF Ministry for Press, Television, and Media November 3, 1999. The registration number is üÌ 77-2037. PRAVDA On-line has been published since January 27, 1999, in close cooperation with the publishers of PPAVDA.Ru.
PRAVDA On-line was founded by a group of contributors to Pravda, standing up for the independence of the oldest Russian newspaper from the Greek partners of the former editor-in-chief, Gennady Seleznev.
In 1994, most of Pravda's journalists left the newspaper, which was then controlled by Greek swindlers, and began to contest in court their right to publish the newspaper. In 1997, in all instances, the courts confirmed the rights of the Pravda journalists, who united in close cooperation with the newspaper Pravda's editorial staff to publish Pravda. The newspaper has been enjoying its independent status for over a year.
In 1998, after the leaders of the RF Communist Party put pressure on the judicial authorities and the public prosecutor, the rights to the newspaper were assigned to the Communist Party. Therefore, only one Pravda newspaper, the version that belongs to the Communist Party, is currently being published in Russia, although the rights and the trademark were assigned to another organization located in the USA. The original of the certificate assigned by the press ministry, which was granted in 1991, is being kept in Greece. Pravda contributors had to turn to the virtual world, and the first version of the Russian Internet daily PRAVDA On-line began to be produced in 1999. In spite of the fact that the journalists of both versions keep in touch with each other, they have different conceptions regarding the coverage of the life of our country and abroad. As opposed to the newspaper Pravda, which analyses events from the point of view of the party's interests, PRAVDA On-line bases itself on a pro-Russian approach to forming the newspaper's policy.
Their insistence on Pravda's independence from the Communist Party is especially amusing. The original Pravda was put out by Trotsky, then taken over by the Bolshevics after the revolution and was a Soviet propaganda vehicle for ever and ever. If my memory doesn't fail me.
Pravdi ni pravda.
Translation: Truth (the newspaper) doesn't speak the truth.
You might keep that in mind...
This is the pertinent issue. Whether it came from Pravada or Mad Magazine...if it's true...it's true. I guess it more important to try to do damage control for Bush than to try and get at the real truth.
I've noticed quite a few articles on FR coming from questionable international sources... Saw one out of the People's Republic the other week... What's with that? Who wants to read this crap?
Here's another Patriotic American headline I found at Pravada!:
LEW ROCKWELL: THE PRINTING PRESS PAYS FOR WAR In a little-noticed announcement, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments has made a stab at estimating the direct costs of this splendid little war against Afghanistan. In the past this group has provided a very useful service in telling us exactly what the Pentagon is loath to talk about: how many taxpayer dollars our military central planners are plowing through on any given day...
Gee, no mention of America defending itself from terrorists attacks. DUH !!
Since when do the commies care about spending tax dollars? Are they afraid their welfare checks may get lowered??
Sounds like a liberal leftie touchie-feelie victimization type web site, eh?
Bush Keeps a Grip on Presidential Papers By ELISABETH BUMILLER ASHINGTON, Nov. 1 — President Bush signed an executive order today to allow a sitting president to keep secret the papers of a previous president, even if a previous president wants his papers made public. Administration officials said the order would provide an "orderly process" to help archivists handle requests for presidential papers. Ari Fleischer, the White House press secretary, said today that "more information will be forthcoming" because of the order. Some historians and public interest lawyers disagreed. "Those claims are absurd," said Hugh Davis Graham, a presidential ...
9853619 posted on 11/1/01 11:38 PM central by JohnHuang2
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush will soon issue an executive order allowing a sitting president to withhold a predecessor's papers from the public - even if the past president wanted them released. The White House denied Thursday the move, which has raised the ire of historians and others who work with presidential records, was designed to shroud the actions of current Bush aides who worked in previous administrations. "That's a mischaracterization," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. He said Bush is simply seeking to establish a process for releasing documents under the 1978 Presidential Records Act. The act, enacted after ...
9838786 posted on 11/1/01 12:08 PM central by callisto
Brancroft is a Lisbon Portugal columnist for Pravda as listed on their web site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.