Skip to comments.
Alliance Forbids weapons
San Francisco Chronicle ^
Posted on 11/16/2001 2:33:00 PM PST by crusadersteve
This article is about the Northern Alliance disarming the folks in the areas it just captured. This gos to show the true colours of the NA. They are no differnet from the Taliban or any other tyrannical group IMHO.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: crusadersteve
Kind of like those who are trying to disarm us! Think about it!
To: crusadersteve
then you are just either really dense or just not paying attention. There is no shortage of weapons in Afghanistan. Would you prefer that the stores of weapons hidden by Taliban be left just where they lay and for the pockets of resistance to re-employ?
3
posted on
11/16/2001 2:36:02 PM PST
by
Steven W.
To: crusadersteve; Poohbah; BlueLancer; blam
Direct link."I will hand over my guns when they ask me to," said 19-year-old Khusrow, who like many Afghans goes by one name. A 300mm pistol protruded underneath his leather jacket.
Wow, I want one too!
4
posted on
11/16/2001 2:41:09 PM PST
by
dighton
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: crusadersteve
Disarmament in a war zone is a lot different from gun control in the U.S. They disarm the Afghanis because they know a large portion are pro-Taliban and would kill their soldiers.
To: crusadersteve
"I will personally go to the streets to collect arms, and the people will not resist me," said Qanooni said. "Naturally I will go with armed guards. If the people resist, then we will arrest them." Sound familiar? Glad I'm not in that wreck of a country.
AB
To: Heisenburger
Well, I do not like the disarming of home defense firearms from the civilian populace there. The Taliban disarmed the folks the same way when took over in 95.
To: crusadersteve
The S F Chronicle is part of the same left wing group that prevented our troops from having military exercises on "their beaches", don't want the second amendment for US citizens, but now complain the Tallies will not be able to defend themselves without their weapons??
The left has truly lost it!
Thank God!
To: ArrogantBustard
That man is the NA equivalent of Rosie I see. I hope we send Rosie over there to the Taliban. She is a pig and well you know how Moslems feel about swine.
To: ArrogantBustard
Sounds like they want to be a "civilized" country. Not bad in theory. Its too bad they're following the lead of the UN and the European countries as their model, though.
11
posted on
11/16/2001 2:54:17 PM PST
by
Wissa
To: parting shot
Well I hope the SF Chronicle folks can put 1 and 1 together and get 2 so that they will also condemn domestic disarmament in this country of ours.
To: crusadersteve
That is a pretty bold statement to make considering they have been at war for years and don't yet know who their friends really are. I would do the same thing under the circumstances.
To: Wissa
The UN is gonna bring Afghanistan into line with their small arms disarmament strategies it seems. Soth Africa is being done the same way they say. Larry Pratt needs to be sent the SF Chronicle article about the NA doing disarming so that he can condemn it in the next GOA magazine or newsletter,or whatever publication GOA has.
To: Wissa
The UN is gonna bring Afghanistan into line with their small arms disarmament strategies it seems. South Africa is being done the same way they say. Larry Pratt needs to be sent the SF Chronicle article about the NA doing disarming so that he can condemn it in the next GOA magazine or newsletter,or whatever publication GOA has.
To: parting shot
The S F Chronicle is part of the same left wing group that prevented our troops from having military exercises on "their beaches", don't want the second amendment for US citizens, but now complain the Tallies will not be able to defend themselves without their weapons??They aren't complaining. They seem to think its a good idea.
16
posted on
11/16/2001 2:59:19 PM PST
by
Wissa
To: wirestripper
they have been at war for years and don't yet know who their friends really are Sounds like a really good reason to keep your home defense weapons. Hint: People who want to disarm you are not your friends.
AB
To: crusadersteve
Try to remember where this is. All this means is they don't want civillians carrying guns in public anymore. Ya can't put American standards on these people. Nobody's going to turn in their REAL guns ... only hide them. We should be so lucky to have the armament these guys get to have. Fully automatic assault rifles are just the beginning.
18
posted on
11/16/2001 3:03:18 PM PST
by
mercy
To: crusadersteve
And you think that any advancing army does not disarm the populace in territories it has just liberated? Especially in a guerilla war? As my great uncle used to say "Get your head out your behind boy!" Any military would be insane not to confiscate weapons given these circumstances.
To: ArrogantBustard
We are talking about machine guns and rocket launchers here AB, not hunting rifles and hand guns.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson