STUDY: "'GAY' SUBSET COMMITS MULTIPLE REPEATED CHILD SEX OFFENSES"

LifeSite ^

[Notwithstanding]

3 to 4.5 boys victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males

CRESTWOOD, KY, November 14, 2001 (LSN.ca) - An important research paper by Dr. Judith Reisman, demonstrates with statistics from the 1992 US Statistical Abstracts that the 'gay' population contains a vast subset which "commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses."

Dr. Reisman is the famous psychologist who discovered that the main body of research which led to the sexual revolution was fraudulent. In her seminal work on the father of modern sexology, Alfred Kinsey, Reisman showed that Kinsey paid pedophiles to sexually experiment with children as young as 2 years of age. Kinsey later used that "data" to give impetus to pedophilia by claiming that children are sexual from birth.

Reisman cites the 1992 Statistical Abstract of the United States saying that 6 to 8 million boys are sexually victimized by members of the approximately 2 million-strong gay community in the US (2% of the adult male population in the US). Comparatively, the statistics indicate that 9% of the heterosexual adult male population of approximately 87 million are responsible for the victimization of 8 million girls. Thus the ratio shows 3 to 4.5 boys are victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males. Reisman concludes that since not all homosexuals males sexually assault boys, a "'gay' subset commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses," each with an average number of victims above 4.

Reisman's full report "Crafting Gay Children" can be found at: http://rsvpamerica.org/crafting%20august%202001.htm#_edn93

See also the RSVP home page: http://rsvpamerica.org

[lepton]

I agree. The analysis my be right, or it may be off, but without the definitions we can't tell. My own review suggests that it's at least a 10:1 homo/heterosexual rate ratio, so at a glance it's in the ballpark, but without the definitions it's hardly citable evidence.

[jlogajan]

According to Justice Dept. statistics, 27% of all children under 12 molested are boys by men.

So we are to conclude that 73% are molested by opposite sex heteros!!!! Clearly the pedophilia problem is MOSTLY due to heteros. Heteros should therefore be exterminated if we really want to effect the pedophilia rate significantly.

[RnMomof7]

This is a propaganda thread...posted and responded to with an agenda..if the thread monitors are looking this should be pulled!

[afraidfortherepublic]

...a lot of the men who molest boys are married (to women) -- many of them even have children of their own (who may or may not be victims themselves). How do you classify them?

Homosexual pedophiles. The "marriage" is insignificant -- merely a way a disguising the man's true proclivities.

[so_real]

Will there ever be a statistical study performed that the fan's of homosexuality and thosed duped by the media can agree is unbiased an indisputable evidence of the general unhealthiness of homosexuality? I don't think so.

The bottom line is that we know homosexuality is bad because God said so, period, end of discussion. This article is wonderful in that it shows statistically some of the reason why God might have deemed it 'abomination'.

I think the author of this study should be commended for attempting to provide accurate and unbiased information. That is a heck of a lot more than Kinsey or the liberal media has done for us!

[dirtboy]

Homosexual pedophiles. The "marriage" is insignificant -- merely a way a disguising the man's true proclivities.

The point is, how are such men counted in the Statistical Abstract cited in this study?

[FormerLib]

How do you classify them?

As pederasts. Some might wish to classify them as heterosexuals, but their actions certainly suggest something other than a normal, healthy individual.

By the way, do you have any numbers on the sort of people you mentioned?

[FormerLib]

you are hilarious

Thank you. Thank you, I'll be here all week. Make sure you try the veal.

[Republic]

Homosexual pedophiles.

[BearCub]

So we are to conclude that 73% are molested by opposite sex heteros!!!! Clearly the pedophilia problem is MOSTLY due to heteros. Heteros should therefore be exterminated if we really want to effect the pedophilia rate significantly.

No, I think that given the relative sizes of the gay and straight populations, we can conclude this: If you pick a random heterosexual guy and a random fag, chances are much greater the fag is also a pedophile. :-)

-bc

[Texaggie79]

or are you trying to establish pedophilia as its own sexual orientation?

Psychological Institutes have shown that many men (@#$@ing SICK men) who are attracted to young boys, do not see it as homosexuality. Usually because the two are caused by different circumstances in growing up, they have a different mindset, whereas many homosexual men are looking for same sex acceptance, many pedophile men are looking to legitimize (in their own mind) sex with boys as an expression of love.

[connectthedots]

A statistic I would be very interested in seeing is what percentage of homosexuals had their first homosexual "experience" with an older person v. a younger person. I would guess that the first experience would be at least 95% with an older person, maybe higher.

[BearCub]

many pedophile men are looking to legitimize (in their own mind) sex with boys as an expression of love.

Perhaps, but their motivation doesn't change the fact that they are homosexual and should be counted among that population.

-bc

[connectthedots]

I would think their behavior determines their classification; not their marital status.

[FormerLib]

The point is, how are such men counted in the Statistical Abstract cited in this study?

Asked and answered in post 9. You can read the linked study for yourself.

[Notwithstanding]

You weenies take the work of an academic WHO IS NOT PC and treat her as if she is too stupid (like the leftish academics) to have already thought of the naive criticisms you mount. Rest assured she has the definitions you are so worried about. For goodness sake! This was a two paragraph snippet explaining the basics of a very lengthy and detailed study - website of the full study provided -and you act like it is sham science.

Why such venomous doubt about one of the few sexologists who dares to buck the PC trend?

[Notwithstanding]

If this is propaganda then all of FR is propaganda.

[so_real]

Finally! Someone else in this PC society who isn't afraid to say "fag"! Commendable!

[null and void]

Pedophiles of any stripe are the lowest form of life.

Maybe, maybe not, but if there is a lower form of life I hope we never encounter it...

These predators need to be permanently removed from polite society. Antarctica looks like a good place to put 'em to me...