Posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:32 PM PST by chance33_98
A North Carolina woman is $2 million richer after winning a lawsuit against her husband's mistress. She sued under the state's alien of affection law. The woman testified that the other woman infiltrated her family and demanded retribution. The judge agreed. "Well, of course I think it takes two to tango," said Christine Cooper, the sued husband's girlfriend. Some legal experts have questioned the constitutionality of the law, calling it an opportunity to get revenge on a spouse. The ruling is the most money ever awarded under the law. News 2 at 4:30
11.13.01
The song I was talking about is "You Never Even Called Me By My Name" by David Allan Coe.
Part of the lyrics:
"WELL, I WAS DRUNK THE DAY MY MOM GOT OUT OF PRISON
AND I WENT TO PICK HER UP IN THE RAIN
BUT BEFORE I COULD GET TO THE STATION IN MY PICKUP TRUCK
SHE GOT RUNNED OVER BY A DAMNED OLD TRAIN"
"NEVER FALL IN LOVE WITH 'LA GUMADA'"
Ya think?!!!?
I tend to agree, but then, my parent's home was broken up by this kind of thing, so, I'm kind of prejudiced. Just think about all the divorces that would NOT ever even be considered, the children who would not have to face "joint custody" arrangements, the men who would not have to pay alimony because they would have no ex-wives, the ex-wives who would not have to try to live on what they make because they can't find their ex-husbands who owe child support, the possibilities are endless. (JMHO)
Really?
I think you just made that up.
Code section, please...
That is such a great observation.
I think that deserve a poll, phantom...
Dig around your closet for that asbestos suit first, though...
You know, there are a lot of reasons why men stray, but one that the media just won't talk about is that straying is just "exciting", "naughty", "forbidden". The lure of forbidden fruit is very strong. Not every straying man is unhappy with his marriage. As a matter of fact, we've seen this happen time and again in the church. A number of men who stray at mid-life are more unhappy with themselves than with their spouses or marriages. Unfortunately, no "one" person can make another person completely happy.
In the above cases, the reason the marriges were able to get back on track is precisely because the men recognized their sinfulness and DID NOT blame their wives for their own actions. Contrast that with sitting through 2 years of pyschobabble disecting a marriage to see "what went wrong with it".
Some marriages need that kind of help; at the same time, I think that kind of help probably destroys a few marriages that would have otherwise remained intact.
Just something to consider.
Not picking on men.....women are a whole 'nother topic.
Think it through, girl!
Pick the woman yourself. Make sure she has the bucks, first.
I suggest Leona Helmsley.
What are you? Some kind of a smarta**??
Dint you know that the touchie-feelie crowd has redefined our language? Who is this Webster fellow anyway?
Get with the program.
No, just the only one that could be held at fault. If a man cheats on his wife, its because he is a jerk. If a woman cheats, its because her husband isn't fulfilling her needs. At least that's what my television tells me...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.