[RaceBannon]

bump for later

[d4now]

bump for later reading

[KirklandJunction]

So EVERY hour you'll tell us you're against free trade?

[shuckmaster]

Well, it's all your fault for voting for him...

[philman_36]

I must say I do admire your determination!
Good luck! LOL
You may find it more feasible, however, to just BTTT the article you already have up...Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277. It may reduce the amount of flak you are apt to catch for posting the same thing numerous times.
A BTTT from the heart for you.

[Dawntreader]

Bump to read later

[JohnGalt]

The reductions are going on because the missiles don't work (rather the Pentagon cannot be sure they work 'cause tehy are not allowed to test them anymore) so it makes sense to reduce them under the guise of disarmament so that we can watch the Russians.

That is theory anyway and the explanation.

[OWK]

What exactly are you trying to say?

[GeekDejure]

Hmmmm . . . wasn't it Daddy Bush who first crowed about a "New World Order" ???

[Protagoras]

If you repost this trash every hour, how many times do you think the thread will be pulled before you get pulled?

[Alas]

BTTT, but expect a whole bunch of Bush apologist, leftist of various stripes and one worlders to hit you from every side.

The Lord God of the Universe, Messiah Yeshua be with and bless you. Put your faith in Him.

Alas

[chicagolady]

Thank you for the heads up. That is why we are in so much trouble, the sheeple do not know what the hell is going on and most do not care. Unless of course it is on prime time TV. We have met the enemy and it is us sheeple!

[Osinski]

bumpit

[Angel]

Your link and web addresses are no longer available. Please post the new web site if you want us to read it. Thanks.

[cactmh]

I am sorry, but I trust George Bush and I know that he has our best interests in mind. If we cut back to 1700 nukes, I am sure that 1700 is enough to the job.

[World'sGoneInsane]

Out of curiousity, I followed the links you suggested. Do you have the link for the most recent treaty? The one you have posted is from '62 and revised twelve times, since then. If anything, post the most recent one.

Go and read the press conference with Presidents Bush and Putin from YESTERDAY: Bush/ Putin Press Conference Oh, and take in some air!

[mombonn]

I REFUSE to read anything with such an annoying title. It makes me think of LIBS, who think they know more than the rest of us peons.

[Jeff Head]

If you want the full text of this document ... click at the following link:

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR
GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

I have had that up on my "Liberty or Death" Site for almost five years.

OWK, I believe DCE is expressing understandable concern regarding what have been ongoing plans over the last few decades for our induction in to a global governance architecture. The plans call for the reduction in our national and individual "arms" capabilities and activitieds in our own Congress and in the UN have lined up with them through the entire period. We continue on that path even as we fight those who have attacked us in such a horrific manner.

But, I don't want to put words in DCE's mouth so I'll leave it at that.

[George Frm Br00klyn Park]

DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

• The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

• The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

• The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

• The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
The above from THIS
Washpost Article
-------------------------

DCE and all, Nah, it don't mean nuthin'. {/SARCASM} Peace and love, George.

[hellinahandcart]

Will post each hour if needed.

(Sigh)

You know, you could achieve the same purpose by simply bumping your own thread every so often. But no, you have to threaten to post the same article twenty-four times today.

That gives me a headache before I even attempt to hit your link.