[Yankee]

But I am not sure what form "bomb evidence" would take.

On this board, all you need is a couple of dozen posters to say "In my mind it was a bomb.", and a few dozen more to answer "Damn right, and anyone that believes otherwise is an idiot.".

That appears to be all the evidence that is necessary to indict any non-conspiracy theorists as government shills.

[walden]

"But I am not sure what form "bomb evidence" would take."

"On this board, all you need is a couple of dozen posters to say "In my mind it was a bomb.", and a few dozen more to answer "Damn right, and anyone that believes otherwise is an idiot.". "

I am told by someone who knows a lot about explosives that there is no such thing as an explosive that doesn't leave a residue-- so if that's it, they'll figure it out, and since Clinton isn't President anymore, they'll tell us!

[Iwo Jima]

"On this board, all you need is a couple of dozen posters to say "In my mind it was a bomb."

I haven't seen your reported phenomena on this board, even though I have tried to read everything on this topic. All that I have read is that some people dispute that a routine mechanical failure could account for this crash, and a few people speculate that a bomb could have been involved.

I would like to hear from some self-proclaimed experts, such as Tennessee Bob, as to what bomb causation would look like. Has anyone heard from TN Bob since the TNSB press conference "shot down" his pet theory of engine failure?

I tend to suspect that there was a bomb or other explosive device which brought this plane down, but I would like to know what that would look like and how the known evidence fits within that scenario.