Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NO SIGNS OF ENGINE FAILURE!
FOX News

Posted on 11/13/2001 1:05:28 PM PST by X-Servative

At the NTSB press conference, they just stated that both engines appear to be intact and that there are no signs of engine failure, according to George Black, NTSB Boardmember.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: flight587
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 641-647 next last
To: Log
Maybe a frozen duck just in from northern Canada was ingested.
401 posted on 11/13/2001 4:09:22 PM PST by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: ScholarWarrior
This is all just speculation of course. That's what we're doing here unless someone has inside info.

If a company builds bad stabilizers for some planes, the new planes might show the same problem later.

Aerdynamic forces rise with low altitude, turbulance, and the square of velocity. If the stabilizer was weak and came off during turbulance and the plane was going fast enough sideways, the wings would rip off.

The Space Shuttle failed very near "Max Q" or maximum dynamic force (air density times velocity squared).

402 posted on 11/13/2001 4:09:38 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
FYI: on Reuters: Rattling Heard in Last Minutes of Doomed Flight

* * *

Listening to the cockpit voice recorder, the rattling of the frame of the Airbus A300-600 can be heard 107 seconds after the pilots powered up the engines and again 14 seconds later, Black said.

The timing still must be matched up with the flight data recorder and with radar, investigators said.

Midway between the two rattling sounds, the captain can be heard remarking that he was encountering the wake of a plane ahead of him, he said.

That plane was a JAL 747, Black said.

403 posted on 11/13/2001 4:11:06 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
On NPR this evening (sorry, nothing better to listen to on the drive home)
there was a stew who lived in Rockaway who described having a piece of what appeared to her to be galley part
that flew into her house when the plane crashed nearby.
Could be consistent with your thought.
404 posted on 11/13/2001 4:11:06 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
I think it was Bush's TAX CUT.
405 posted on 11/13/2001 4:12:02 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
That plane was a JAL 747, Black said.

If you'd have said a JAL 747 with an Arab tailgunner, you would be a hero here right now.

406 posted on 11/13/2001 4:13:27 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Probably a random check. The FAA has mandated security sweeps on planes on a random basis. I don't know the criteria for selection, but there's no notice.

You don't suppose one of the security personnel could actually be. . .???

407 posted on 11/13/2001 4:13:42 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Oh, I agree.
I just wasn't clear where you were going with the comment.
The stab is just too clean for me to sleep well on airplanes, particularly with no engine problems.
408 posted on 11/13/2001 4:14:00 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
"On this board, all you need is a couple of dozen posters to say "In my mind it was a bomb."

I haven't seen your reported phenomena on this board, even though I have tried to read everything on this topic. All that I have read is that some people dispute that a routine mechanical failure could account for this crash, and a few people speculate that a bomb could have been involved.

I would like to hear from some self-proclaimed experts, such as Tennessee Bob, as to what bomb causation would look like. Has anyone heard from TN Bob since the TNSB press conference "shot down" his pet theory of engine failure?

I tend to suspect that there was a bomb or other explosive device which brought this plane down, but I would like to know what that would look like and how the known evidence fits within that scenario.
409 posted on 11/13/2001 4:14:35 PM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
I'm glad you cleared that up for me. Thanks.....Just curious why when people of you ilk have a disagreement with someone you tend to equate proficiency in English with intelect. Last I.Q. Test I took.....I scored 159. Say what you will and it is predictable. Einstien was poor at spelling and English. He also had dyslexia (so do I). It apparently has little affect on cognitive reasoning. Oh no.....................I can see it already you will claim that I am comparing myself to Einstien. If attacking me makes you feel better go for it. You and your type seem to enjoy wasting your time. P.S. I have a degree in Physics and Mathematics so please don't lecture me on mundane knowledge you appear to think is only privy to you awe inspiring intelect
410 posted on 11/13/2001 4:15:30 PM PST by flea69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
I think it was Bush's TAX CUT.

No, this accident was a ploy by the Democrats to federalize aircraft mechanics. Since we now know that we can't trust airline mechanics, we must make the mechanics all federal government employees and card-carrying Democrats.

Just joking.

411 posted on 11/13/2001 4:16:53 PM PST by Log
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
When I read what you write in that magical font...it is so beautiful, and magical, and spiritual, and I feel like I'm falling in love, or going to heaven, and I think of unicorns, and magic snow, and fairies, and angels, and I could just die, I really mean it.

what were you saying?

412 posted on 11/13/2001 4:17:33 PM PST by ramdalesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

I'm not sold on the "it's just an accident routine; however, if the pilot was encountering the wake of a plane ahead of him, what can a wake do to a plane?
413 posted on 11/13/2001 4:19:08 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

Comment #414 Removed by Moderator

To: ramdalesh
Heh guys, go find the back seat of a car or something. We're talking some serious airplane S**t here.
415 posted on 11/13/2001 4:20:33 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Log
Massive Metal Fatique
416 posted on 11/13/2001 4:20:50 PM PST by jude_3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
what is the APU ?
417 posted on 11/13/2001 4:20:53 PM PST by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Spontaneous Macro Disassembly"
418 posted on 11/13/2001 4:21:45 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
We're talking some serious airplane S**t here.

We're talking some serious S**t here alright.

I'm not sure about the airplane part though.

419 posted on 11/13/2001 4:22:22 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

Comment #420 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 641-647 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson