[Rome2000]

There is NO evidence that a bomb blew up that plane.

Actually, there's way more evidence that there was a bomb than not (little things like people hearing an explosion and pieces like the wing and engine falling off and landing away from the main crash site).

If anybody is hysterical it is you, I'm LMAO at your posts!

[jwalsh07]

According to a former NTSB investigator engines on the Airbuses are designed to seperate on catastrophic failure. Did you know that?

[sinkspur]

Actually, there's way more evidence that there was a bomb than not (little things like people hearing an explosion and pieces like the wing and engine falling off and landing away from the main crash site).

You need to look up the thread on the GE CF-6. Catastrophic engine failure can destroy the engine, the shroud, and blades can rip into the wings and fuselage. The CF-6 has been failing on an irregular basis for ten years.

"People hearing" don't mean anything when fuel explodes, no matter what the cause.

As walsh says, why would a terrorist blow up a plane destined for one of the poorest countries in the world?

[MeekOneGOP]

If anybody is hysterical it is you, I'm LMAO at your posts!

Me too, actually. He should audition for the Comedy Club? ;-)

[Citizen of the Savage Nation]

Ever consider that a catastrophic engine failure could make a really loud noise??