Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: t-shirt
An obvious conclusion is that there were explosions and fire seen from both sides of the plane. Or that the fire was coming close enough to the middle of the plane that it could be described as being on either side. Whatever happened, it was pretty friggin catastrophic.
238 posted on 11/16/2001 1:15:04 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan
An obvious conclusion is that there were explosions and fire seen from both sides of the plane.
--- aruanan

Yes, there could well have been explosions on both sides of the plane and each individual observing the ground could very likely not see both sides of the plane. But either way whether there was one or more explosions--we know there was atleast an explosion. But what is so outrageous is the government is completely denying that there was any explosion at all before the crash. And even more outrageous is the government is saying it doesn't even suspect the crash was anything other than an accident. Even though it happened in NY and nearly 2 months from the day of the last WTC attacks.

241 posted on 11/16/2001 1:16:56 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson