Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Severe security lapse surrounds mapping project (GIS maps sent to China)
The Tullahoma News ^ | 11/11/01 | Brian Mosely

Posted on 11/11/2001 7:44:10 AM PST by Brian Mosely

MANCHESTER - Local officials have expressed security concerns over an effort to bring the Tennessee Base Mapping Program to Coffee County after it was discovered that high quality mapping data of the area may have been sent to China.

The information was revealed during a meeting of a newly formed committee made up of officials from the county, the two cities and utility districts who are examining how to go about bringing the program to Coffee County.

David Kellar, representing the City of Tullahoma's Planning and Codes Department told the committee that while they were researching the mapping program, they have been told the film of the fly-overs of Franklin and Lincoln counties was sent to and developed in the communist country.

"That threw up a red flag and we said, 'we have a security problem,'" Kellar said.

County Executive James Wilhelm said, "Surely, the people in Nashville and Washington will see the problem with this...this sticks out like a sore thumb."

"I mean, we've got Arnold Center sitting out there."

Mark A. Tuttle, director of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the State of Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration's Office of Information Resources, confirmed to The News Friday that a subcontractor working on the mapping project is located in China.

"The state's contractor, Tennessee Geographic Information (TGI), does in fact have a subcontractor that's located in China," Tuttle said.

TGI's primary subcontractor, Earth Data International of Gaithersburg, Md., develops the film, and the actual compilation and collection of data from the aerial photography is done in China, Tuttle explained.

Earth Data International is also listed on the Internet as a subcontractor for The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA), which provides accurate imagery, imagery intelligence and geospatial information in support of the nation's military forces and national policy makers and civil users.

NIMA is a Department of Defense (DoD) combat support agency that supplies critical support for the national decision-making process and contributes to the high state of operational readiness of America's military forces.

When asked what concerns the state or federal government might have over the detailed mapping data going to a foreign power after the events of Sept. 11, Tuttle stated that Tennessee had requested TGI to "appropriately document what security procedures are in place and what procedures they will be taking to ensure that the data is kept secure."

The state program would produce a comprehensive digital base map suitable for inclusion in GIS, which is an organized collection of hardware, software, data, and personnel designed to input, analyze and display geographically referenced information.

When completed, the highly detailed map could be used for a huge variety of purposes such as for law enforcement, choosing where to place water lines, identifying where proposed construction can go or where future infrastructure needs to be.

If approved, work could begin in Coffee County in early 2002.

Photographic flights over Coffee County could be conducted in the winter or early spring months. Plans are to map all areas of the state into the system in the space of four or five years.

County Budget director Mark Allen said the committee would have to make some quick decisions on what kind of photographic resolution they would want used on which areas of the county.

"We do have some time constraints," Allen said.

But Allen also expressed concern with the revelation that detailed aerial maps of the county would be given to China.

"We don't want China to be able to pinpoint stuff, but it sounds like they're going to be able to get it anyway," he said, adding that the state is going to map the area no matter if the county participates or not.

"China is going to have the information anyway, which is scary," he said.

Wilhelm suggested the committee request that Tuttle return for a meeting to hear the county's concerns.

Allen continued to express concern: "I think our citizens would be a bit upset if we took detailed pictures that's going to be taken and mapped and then sent to China," he said.

The plan developed for the Base Mapping Program calls for a partnership between the State of Tennessee, the federal government, local governments, and the private sector.

Local government participation in the amount of 25 percent of the total costs is being sought from those counties that can afford to participate.

The cost for Coffee County would total $85,353.03, with the remaining 75 percent provided by state and federal funding in the amount of $341,412.13.

The funding could be split in the county five or six different ways, according to Wilhelm, depending how the cities and utility districts participate in the program.

However, if a decision were made not to participate, the information would be denied to the county.

A person using the system could call up any area in the county on a computer with pinpoint accuracy using the Global Positioning System (GPS).

GPS is a satellite-based system for recording positional information and other data about a geographic feature. Ground positions are calculated by using signals from satellites orbiting the Earth.

The electronic map is layered where objects such as gas and water lines can be shown, as well as where the highest crime districts are located and data like population density and property values.

Law enforcement and emergency workers could even use the system to call up a map in a emergency to relay information about the physical layout of a building or even how many people live inside of a structure.

The members of the committee looking at the program in Coffee County are Jimmy White, property assessor; Dean Keith, Hillsville Utility District; Bryan Pennington, Manchester Water Department; Coy Nobltt, mayor of Manchester; David Kellar, Tullahoma Planning and Codes Department; Don Stone, Manchester city administrator, and Dale Willis of the Tullahoma Utilities Board.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
It looks like it's just business as ususal during our war on terrorism when it comes to our relationship with China. It's one thing reading about the security lapses for years on FR...now they've cropped up here right under my nose in Tennessee. Has anyone else heard of anything like this happening in their area? I'd hate to think we've been giving China free detailed overhead imagery of our infrastructure that they could sell to the highest bidder or find other uses for.
1 posted on 11/11/2001 7:44:11 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Since highly detailed USGS maps are available at low cost, I don't see how this makes much difference. High-res satellite photos are available on the Internet. All this info is probably in the public domain, anyway.

No offense, but Coffee County is probably not on the priority target list for China (or anybody else). Their missiles won't reach TN, anyway.

2 posted on 11/11/2001 7:54:34 AM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Our official don't think so...for one, we have AEDC here...a huge security concren. GIS is a whole lot more detailed than topograhpic maps. It is suppose to have everything included in them: gas lines, power, water...you name it.
3 posted on 11/11/2001 7:58:11 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Given that every thing you say is correct don't we at least have to start somewhere?
4 posted on 11/11/2001 8:36:48 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
I agree with this. GIS databases are on the internet for many, many counties across the country. Not all have aerial imagery, but you'd be amazed at the information in the public domain. Nothing new here.
5 posted on 11/11/2001 8:45:48 AM PST by rokkhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
The information you speak of is very easy to obtain, trust me.
6 posted on 11/11/2001 8:50:57 AM PST by rokkhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
The article doesn't specify what task the Chinese sub-contractor would perform in developing the GIS database. The orthorectified images could be used in targeting cruise missles and the infrastructure layers could be helpful in identifying sabotage targets, but this project represents just one small area of the United States. Imagine piecing together a mosaic of finely detailed tiles and only having a bit here and a bit there. I have confidence that NIMA is not giving the Chinese anything of strategic importance.

Actually the data flows in both directions and the Chinese are not happy about it. I work in the GIS field with international data related to energy resource assessment. Many countries, China, Iran and until recently, Russia, purposely distort cartographic data to foil the evil plots of the Great Satan/American hegemonists/Capitalist Imperialists. Of course, Yankee ingenuity results in work-arounds.

I am much more concerned with critical software development taking place in these countries. Their programmers can put in backdoors and boobytraps in applications that they write for banks and other institutions.

7 posted on 11/11/2001 8:53:11 AM PST by El Pato Lukas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
While I have been able to get aerial shots for years through the internet and discount the likelihood that there is much a new risk, I do think this is a splendid project for the state to ax given the current chicken little stories about fiscal disaster and wanting new taxes passed.
8 posted on 11/11/2001 8:57:05 AM PST by Nora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Pato Lukas
All the state guy would tell me is the "actual compilation and collection of data from the aerial photography is done in China" and he left it at that. The local officials looking into participating in the program have a real problem with where the state's subcontractor is sending this information. That discussion dominated the meeting. There is a lot of national security stuff going on out at the base and I doubt they want to have that kind of detailed data going to the Chinese.
9 posted on 11/11/2001 9:03:34 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
One foot resolution, including elevation, from a flyover. Are the data layers that identify stuff in the images going to China as well.
10 posted on 11/11/2001 9:03:36 AM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
That is just one of the questions I'm going to have this week as the committee checks further into this. They were gung-ho about bringing the system into the county...until they learned about the pictures being given to the Chinese. The state will be doing the overflights anyhow, but the program involving the county will allow them to have access to the finished data...just as long as we throw in our 25%...$85,000.
11 posted on 11/11/2001 9:12:14 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
In some counties the local DoD installations provide part of the funding. If so, they may have a clause in their contract with the county re use of non-US subcontractors. Might be true at the state level too?
12 posted on 11/11/2001 9:31:41 AM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
No Air Force officials have been present at any of the meetings I have covered over this matter. The initial state briefing was just last week and they really seem to want to fast track this project through and get started. I know just who to ask about this, though. Thanks, you are giving some good questions for a follow up story.
13 posted on 11/11/2001 9:37:10 AM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely; Carry_Okie
Thanks for posting this. As a recent elected county official, I was alway intensely interested in even the domestic mischief and further centralized control that could further weaken the local officials in representing their property owning constituents positions.

This is an equally interesting concern, maybe even a little more so.

C.O. Is the GIS touched upon in your newly published book, Natural Process? I want to discuss it with you further. Our County has the ONLY elected County Surveyor in CA and we as electeds, had numerous intense discussions, especially since during the 1994 election process, many constituents were intensely interested in "Devolution," to the point of "County Supremacy!" It was right up there with "Home Rule!"

14 posted on 11/11/2001 11:15:54 AM PST by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
I've found that one way control is centralized is the tactic of "bringing our rules into compliance with state or federal guidelines". That is the reasoning I hear for some of the resolutions or actions taken in county government on a wide range of issues. Also, in Tennessee, the budget mess is hanging over the county's heads right now with the possiblilty of the Legislature withholding state shared revenue...money is always the best way of "control"...
15 posted on 11/11/2001 12:42:43 PM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely; Carry_Okie; snopercod; Dog Gone; Not gonna take it anymore; Travis McGee...
"Also, in Tennessee, the budget mess is hanging over the county's heads right now with the possiblilty of the Legislature withholding state shared revenue...money is always the best way of "control"..."

Over the last decade, this already has happened in CA. Even though Prop 13 (the great CA tax revolt of the mid '70's) capped property taxes, in the '90's the State stole our meager, already limited resources while passing numerous unfunded mandates on counties in the meantime.

It's no wonder they like the USSR style of concentrating power in the Crapitol. Could you imagine being a lobbyist and having to lobby the board of Commissioners in each of the 58 counties in CA to get 3 out of 5 votes to get something adopted uniformaly Statewide?

Yet it's no wonder we were interested in "County Supremacy" and "Devolution of Power!" Unfortunately, OKC just stopped the whole movement, right in it's tracks. I went to a meeting regarding the "Home Rule" movement at the University of CA at Davis, attended by Fed, State and Local elected and appointed government types who were terrified out of their friggen minds over these government shrinking movements, trying desperately to smear them as Militia, Freemen and militant conservative extremist, even terrorist idealogs.

I had to remind them that I supported some of these ideas and that people that voted for me did too. But, I would never support people that took the law in their own hands, only those who used politics, as politics is how we change things without killing each other in this great land.

16 posted on 11/11/2001 6:55:06 PM PST by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Since highly detailed USGS maps are available at low cost, I don't see how this makes much difference.

It makes a lot of difference altitude wise. The GPS constellation are in circular orbits, which each satellite "knows" exactly. But the shape of the earth varies substantially from a sphere - even an elipsoid. That's why your civilian GPS can be off as much as 500' in altitude depending on where you are holding it.

The information describing the exact shape of the earth - the kind needed to target a cruise missile - is classified either Secret or Top Secret, not sure which.

17 posted on 11/12/2001 1:59:29 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson