Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saying No to Assisted Suicide
The Weekly Standard ^ | 11/19/2001 | Wesley J. Smith

Posted on 11/10/2001 4:48:10 PM PST by Pokey78

The attorney general takes on Oregon.

WHEN OREGON VOTERS legalized assisted suicide in 1994, state regulators had a problem. They wanted to authorize doctors to prescribe barbiturates as killing agents. But the federal government regulates the use of these drugs under the Controlled Substances Act, and federal law did not permit their use to intentionally kill.

Ordinarily, that would have been that. The feds, not the states, have the final say about what would and would not be a proper use of drugs governed by the Controlled Substances Act. Unfortunately, Oregon's assisted suicide law went into effect during the Clinton years, when principle and the rule of law were rarely allowed to impede political expedience. Thus, it was hardly surprising when former Attorney General Janet Reno declared that she would not enforce federal law against Oregon's doctors who assisted patient suicides, thereby permitting a state to nullify the federal proscription against using controlled substances to kill.

Proponents of assisted suicide were thrilled. Their Oregon beachhead secure, they expected to spread their dark agenda nationwide. Instead, they have been turned back by a potent alliance of liberal disability rights activists, conservative pro-lifers, members of the hospice movement, medical professionals, and advocates for the poor and minorities. Only seven years after the Oregon law passed, the landscape has dramatically changed: Jack Kevorkian is in prison for murder; initiatives attempting to legalize assisted suicide failed in Michigan in 1998 by 71-29 percent and in Maine last year by 51-49 percent; and the U.S. Supreme Court, followed by Florida and Alaska high courts, all ruled that there is no constitutional right to assisted suicide.

And now, assisted suicide in Oregon has taken a body blow. Last Wednesday, Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a memorandum to Asa Hutchinson, the new head of the DEA, reversing Reno's decision. Oregon regulations will no longer override the Controlled Substances Act. "Assisting suicide is not a 'legitimate medical purpose'" under the meaning of that act, Ashcroft stated, and doctors who assist suicides act "inconsistently with the public interest." Accordingly, even though assisted suicide remains legal in Oregon, the DEA will now be authorized to revoke the federal prescribing license of any doctor who uses controlled substances lethally rather than medically.

Predictably, Oregon has sued, its politicians bellowing that their "state's rights" have been violated. But this is nonsense. Ashcroft based his decision on the recent 8-0 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, which ruled that while California was free to legalize medical marijuana all it wanted, the state's decision did not prevent the federal government from enforcing federal law proscribing the use of marijuana for any purpose.

Not surprisingly, a federal judge has temporarily restrained implementation of Ashcroft's decision, questioning why the attorney general waited months before changing Justice Department policy. But it is hard to see how any court can prevent Ashcroft from enforcing federal law unless it openly flouts the Supreme Court ruling in Cannabis Buyer's Club.

Of course, this is the Ninth Circuit, the most reversed court in the country, so the road is likely to be bumpy. But the Supreme Court sits at the end of that road, and thus, it is probably only a matter of time before the Controlled Substances Act is enforced uniformly in all 50 states.

Oregon euthanasia activists warn that Ashcroft's memo will create a "chilling effect" for doctors who wish to aggressively treat pain. But this is baseless fear-mongering. Ashcroft has already written to the president of the Oregon Medical Association assuring him that Oregon doctors "have no reason to fear" that prescribing "controlled substances to control pain will lead to increased scrutiny by the DEA, even when high doses of painkilling drugs are necessary." Moreover, states that have outlawed assisted suicide, while at the same time making it clear that aggressive treatment of pain is a proper medical act, have seen tremendous per capita increases in the prescription of morphine to treat pain. For example, in 1996 Rhode Island outlawed assisted suicide. Since then, per capita morphine use has increased 164 percent. Michigan's similar ban resulted in increased morphine use of 20 percent since 1998. Similarly, Louisiana banned assisted suicide in 1995 and has seen a 26 percent increase in per capita morphine use.

Any lingering worries about chilling effects could be easily thawed by passing the Pain Relief Promotion Act, legislation that would explicitly make aggressive pain control a legitimate medical purpose under the Controlled Substances Act. Unfortunately, passage of this important bill was thwarted last year by Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who feared the pain relief legislation would do what Ashcroft has just done--reassert a federal penalty for doctors who use controlled substances to engage in assisted suicide. Wyden saw to it that the legislative clock ran out on the pain relief act.

Now that Ashcroft has properly restored federal standards in the use of controlled substances, there is no further excuse to thwart passage of the Pain Relief Promotion Act. If Wyden and the other backers of Oregon's assisted suicide regime really care about suffering patients, this time they won't stand in the way.



Wesley J. Smith, an attorney for the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, is the author of "Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America."


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; christianlist; euthanasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: CyberCowboy777
Was "hoss" a term of enderment?

No, merely a reference to your handle, cowboy.

41 posted on 11/10/2001 6:22:10 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You wanna win against the rats you get back in their faces and talk to em Like they do. You attack em with words or just boo em. We found that works well.

Are you calling me names? This is the second post in which you have referred to "rats".

42 posted on 11/10/2001 6:25:22 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Incidentally, I would appreciate it if someone could point out to me the scriptures forbidding suicide?
43 posted on 11/10/2001 6:26:21 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock
If you're the kind of person who doesn't believe that there are those who would assisted an unwanted relative to his death against said relative's wishes -- if the law allowed it -- you are naive.
44 posted on 11/10/2001 6:32:26 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock
Don't you just love people that are so sure they know God's will that they are prepared to force everyone else to comply with it. Reminds one of a certain group currently infesting Afghanistan.
45 posted on 11/10/2001 6:33:10 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock
You really have to get a scritptural reference to prove to you that killing yourself is wrong? I would think your conscience would be your guide.

Judeo-Christianity is based on love--and it is with respect and love that we treat our bodies because they are created by God.

46 posted on 11/10/2001 6:33:42 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock

These are terminally ill patients, with no hope of recovery, who are in debilitating pain. Who is Ashcroft to tell them that sorry, they'll just have to bite the pillow and bear with it.

My step-father had prostate cancer that led to bone cancer. At 5'9", he weighed about 80 lbs. at death. My wife and I went down to Phoenix to give what aid and commfort we could to my mother. After seeing him and hearing the cries of a WWII vet who survived the beaches at Normandy, and had a ditinguised career as a police officer (best finger print man in AZ), as he laid helpless in bed, tore at all of us.

Those who would deny a man like that an easier death are either heartless or unknowing.

BTW, morphine and demerol don't do didly for bone cancer.

47 posted on 11/10/2001 6:34:24 PM PST by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
You'll excuse me if I say don't believe that you are an authority on this subject. Some cancer is more painful than other - for example - liver or pancreatic cancer. Different people have different levels of tolerance for pain.
48 posted on 11/10/2001 6:34:39 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
Stuff it, jerk. No one said force. We're having a discussion of right and wrong, and being a libertarian you no doubt can't comprehend that. Relativism is god isn't it? If if feels good do it!

For you to compare Christianity to the creeps in Afghanistan is laughable--you live in the freeist society in the world and its because of Judeo-Christianity not in spite of it.

49 posted on 11/10/2001 6:37:12 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
No, I don't need a reference. That is for the person who keeps calling me a rat because I disagree with him, and stating that I'm telling God what to do.

Secondly, we're talking assisted suicide for the terminally ill, not suicide on a whim or because you're depressed.

50 posted on 11/10/2001 6:38:12 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
Don't you just love people that are so sure they know God's will that they are prepared to force everyone else to comply with it. Reminds one of a certain group currently infesting Afghanistan.

Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharisees.

51 posted on 11/10/2001 6:41:13 PM PST by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777; juliabrock
You may not be aware that the FDA is cutting way back on the allowable pain perscriptions that Dr.s can use, such that terminal patients will not be able to get sufficient meds to die without pain.
I am on the side of juliabrock.

I think drugs should be legaized and the FDA sent to China, but that's another topic.

52 posted on 11/10/2001 6:41:38 PM PST by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
I am glad to see that you are such a nice polite christian.
53 posted on 11/10/2001 6:42:52 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rightofrush
I know you won't want to hear this, but I'm going to say it anyway. I am sorry for the pain and suffering your father endured. I can only offer you my humble condolences for your loss. I still don't believe that we should open the door to people like Kevorkian and for people to give Doctors the power to play god. We all suffer in differnt forms, and I am not trying to lessen what your father went through, but we are called upon to make all things a means of holiness.
54 posted on 11/10/2001 6:43:45 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
I don't think that calling someone a jerk is the best way to present your point of view, and it's totally rude. There are some Christians who abuse and distort the Bible, just as there are Muslims who abuse and distort the Koran. No thinking person can deny this.
55 posted on 11/10/2001 6:46:35 PM PST by juliabrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
There is no way that the Fed's have this power constitutionaly. Where is it granted in the Constitution. There is no way you can justify this under the Commerce Clause.

Since FDR, the Constitution has lost its ability to keep the Executve in check. FDR, and every president that followed him, have given the Constitution lip service and nothing more.

For the Bushies that are still True Belivers, name one EO that GW has recinded.
Those that think that Reagan was a "true" conservative, can you give me a reason why GHW Bush was named as vice president after he vowed that he would never do so?
If not, I'll give you one. He got a phone call after he received the nomenation that changed his mind. He was probably given an offer he couldn't refuse.
The assasination attempt was a reminder of that offer.

56 posted on 11/10/2001 6:46:52 PM PST by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
You want polite? Then don't compare my religion to the taleban in Afghanistan.

The difference between you and I is that I'm for life in all of its forms, with all its faults, sufferings, pain, joy, and love...etc etc...in short, if you want to kill yourself be my guest--but don't expect me to go along with you roping doctors and other people into doing the dirty work for you. Eh--nevermind...we're losin the culture.

57 posted on 11/10/2001 6:48:23 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock
Good grief--you lobby for being able to kill yourself and other but you don't want me to call someone a jerk??????

good night Julia.

58 posted on 11/10/2001 6:50:48 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
You must have felt the shoe fit because my comment was not addressed to you.
59 posted on 11/10/2001 6:51:06 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Thank You for your kind words.
60 posted on 11/10/2001 6:53:09 PM PST by deadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson