Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: l33t
It would still take years to build all the new nuclear reactors and meanwhile we'd be depended on Saudi oil. What I don't understand is why no serious effort has been undertaken to develop the technology to control the nuclear fusion reaction for use in power generation.

No, it wouldn't. Nuclear reactors are off-the-shelf technology. They could be put up very quickly. There is serious effort in fusion, but it's still decades away from even a basic working model, let alone a commercial version. With fusion, you still have radioactivity to deal with. With fission, it's proven, reliable, safe, feasible, and cost-effective (not taking into account artificial costs imposed by anti-nuke suits), and it's ready right now. For that matter, using breeder reactors there is and will be plenty of fuel to supply all energy needs (that which doesn't rely on actually burning anything) for tens of thousands of years without even having to think of fusion. However, fusion would be great for such things as ore processing.
15 posted on 11/10/2001 5:31:22 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan
bttt
171 posted on 12/02/2001 7:37:08 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: aruanan
bttt
177 posted on 12/08/2001 1:48:06 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: aruanan
bttt
178 posted on 12/08/2001 1:49:06 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson