Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's Treasonus Message To Osama Bin Laden - Don't Shoot, I'm On Your Side!!!
Limbaught, few angry drunks at club last night, MB-26

Posted on 11/10/2001 9:21:15 AM PST by MindBender26

Rush hinted at this yesterday and others expanded on it last evening: Clinton's speech at Georgetown this week was a not-so cryptic message to Osama Bin Laden: “Don't attack me, Bill Clinton, I'm on your side!!!”

Clinton's shameless approval of the WTC attacks, placing blame for 5000 dead Americans on President Bush because the US killed Native Americans 200 years ago, is a new low for a man who is defined by the word shameless. We know Clinton thwarted attempts to stop Bin Laden three years ago. Now we know Clinton is worried that, as a former President, he might a target for terrorism.

Clinton need not pump his ego to that degree. Few productive citizens would mourn Clinton's passing and Bin Laden probably has more important uses for his explosives.

The only defense against an assumption that this was Clinton's hidden message is your possible belief that "Clinton wouldn't stoop so low."

Please, just stop and think for a moment. Search your memories and try to unearth one thing, anything, Clinton would not do to preserve, protect, promote and pimp for his own hide. Name one thing Clinton would not do!

Even worse, try to think of one thing he probably hasn’t already done to this end. After all, for a man who accepted $88,000,000.00 from the Chinese to buy votes for his reelection, what is a little treason with few Islamic fundamentalists.

We knew he was a coward from his draft-dodging days, but until this week, we didn't know he would give Bin Laden permission to kill another 5,000 Americans just to save his own hide!


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: augustus99
Clinton's intellectual powers exceed those of our current president by an order of magnitude.

Oh yea, what mr clinton's SAT scores, oh we don't know.

Okay his college grade, oh yea, we don't know.

But we do know he passed Yale Law School with a pass on a pass/fail system.

61 posted on 11/11/2001 5:00:35 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: augustus99
There are a lot of brainwashed culties who are so afraid of having their beliefs threatened that they seek out information, however dubious that supports them, while rejecting all other information, however reputable or demonstrably true, as "propaganda".

Spoken in true form, from a "brainwashed (Clintoon) cultie" himself. Good grief man, if everyone thought like you, we'd be kissing our "freedom-loving" okoles goodbye (over 5000 NY'ers already did that). Including, the right to blather off brainwashed swill as you seem to fancy. Clintoon was, is, and always will be a pathological liar. Any reputable "non partisan" medical professional in mental health can attest to that. Get over it, and move onto the next liberal flap-jaw.

62 posted on 11/11/2001 5:03:00 PM PST by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: juliabrock
Yeth, how bloody thilly to ever elect a cad such as Willy in the first place. We ought to find out who invited him into the club and give that chap a stern talking to, and in the process, find out who reccomended that chap too!

After all, Willie is so statemanlike, like our Duke of Windsor. After all, he , the Duchess and that Hitler chap all got on rather well........

63 posted on 11/11/2001 5:23:20 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
We are not dissussing Clinton's intellect. In reality, he is a very smart man. I would guess he is close to being a genius.

The question is, what did he do with the talents God and his genes gave him? Unfortunately, he squandered his brain power and charm to make himself very electable, very sexy and very often sexually serviced, not to serve the country and its people.

I would remind you that Caligula, Nero, J.W. Booth, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Saddam and Idi Amin were all brilliant men and practiced communicators too.

64 posted on 11/11/2001 5:29:57 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
The ship you refer to in point #4 is the Amistad.

I don't trust anything clinton says in any light. But the person who responded to me was well within reason in his point about the speech.

65 posted on 11/11/2001 5:32:53 PM PST by nancetc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kstewskis
. He is a danger to our country, perhaps more so now that he's out of office/

Clinton has a need for public addoration and his behaviour will become more bizarre as he needs to do more and more to get the attention he craves.

(Strongly suggest you do not do ANYTHING that might be considered paysical threat to Clinton. That very anti-FR and prohitited here. Be well... and wish Clinton a long life so future generation can laugh at him.)

66 posted on 11/11/2001 5:34:35 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: nancetc
Clinton will slip further and further into his self-agrandizind delusions as he gets older.
67 posted on 11/11/2001 5:36:12 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
We have no one to blame for clinton, but, ourselves. He was elected TWICE for God's sake. We knew what he was then and we know it now. The American people can only blame themselves AND the repubs for putting two old men to run against him. Bush1 ran his campaign as if he didn't care. Dole was humorless and look liked a stern disciplinarian.
68 posted on 11/11/2001 5:39:41 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I believe you are absolutely right about clinton sinking lower and lower. He disgusts me.
69 posted on 11/11/2001 5:40:15 PM PST by nancetc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TooRight
You assert that Rush made the silly suggestion that liberals were sending the anthrax....I listen most days, and have no memory of him saying such a thing....and any semi-intelligent person would know that if such was said it was in jest (tongue in cheek) as he OFTEN does....using something so over the top as a way to poke fun at the media for their hysteria. As for Clinton NOT saying America was to blame to the WTC, what person with any IQ above 4 would not come away from hearing his "we are still paying" line and think ANYTHING else?
70 posted on 11/11/2001 5:40:47 PM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TooRight
Here's the critical passage (out of a very long, rambling speech):

Terror, the killing of noncombatants for economic, political, or religious reasons has a very long history as long as organized combat itself, and yet it has never succeeded as a military strategy standing on its own, but it has been around a long time. Those of us who come from various European lineages are not blameless. Indeed, in the first Crusade, when the Christian soldiers took Jerusalem, they first burned a synagogue with 300 Jews in it, and proceeded to kill every woman and child who was Muslim on the Temple Mount. The contemporaneous descriptions of the event describe soldiers walking on the Temple Mount, a holy place to Christians, with blood running up to their knees. I can tell you that that story is still being told to today in the Middle East and we are still paying for it.

Here in the United States, we were founded as a nation that practiced slavery and slaves were, quite frequently, killed even though they were innocent. This country once looked the other way when significant numbers of Native Americans were dispossessed and killed to get their land or their mineral rights or because they were thought of as less than fully human and we are still paying the price today. Even in the 20th century in America people were terrorized or killed because of their race. And even today, though we have continued to walk, sometimes to stumble, in the right direction, we still have the occasional hate crime rooted in race, religion, or sexual orientation. So terror has a long history.

OK, explain to me how that is aying anything but America is reaping what we sowed in our past!

71 posted on 11/11/2001 6:10:03 PM PST by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Excellent, and very interesting catch. Especially liked your description of speech as "rambling."

It reminds me very much of Hillary's Welsley graduation speech in that regard..

72 posted on 11/11/2001 7:06:56 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nancetc
You are right about ship name. Thank you.

Toured museum in Ghana with conservative mixed-race group including a very successful, very wealthy Black businessman, Black physician and her husband, Black airline captain, along with about 20 Whites.

Typical Black response to reading official slavery history was "Well, Brother Jessie really screwed up the details again!"

BTW, Black airline captain is relief captain on 747 transpac. He waits until they are about 90 minutes west of Hawaii then goes back into upper deck/first class cabin. There he seeks out Black passengers and speaks to them about benefits to Black people of what he calls "Responsible Republicanism."

He says, considering there is no land within 500 miles and no floats on a 747, passengers tend to listen very closely when a four-stripper speaks, and if they can afford a first class ticket, these are the folks he wants be speaking to!

73 posted on 11/11/2001 7:19:35 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: augustus99
Yes, he lied about having sex. In fact, he was the first one in history to ever have an affair and lie about it.

Personally, if your wife, daughter or significant other is ever involved in a sexual harassment suit where she/he contents that a man in a position of power in the organization in which she/he works requested, in a vulgar and intimidating way, certain sexual favors and he lies under oath about similar behavior that he has engaged in with other subordinates, find a jury made up of people very UNLIKE yourself.

It wasn't just sex to all the Jane Does in the affidavits ignored by the U.S. Senate.

It wasn't just sex to Juanita Broaderick.

It was just a lie about sex to people who think the man was born with license to use anyone any way he wants to because his agenda matched theirs.

74 posted on 11/11/2001 7:28:22 PM PST by falfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
EEEK I read that as a four stripper as in ...well you know...not a ////. LOL

I'm glad there are folks of all races not tied into the demeaning policy of the demoncrats. That policy has long been...ohhhh poor you big brother will help you by making you more dependent on government than a policy of: I believe you can make it. I know you can achieve great things. And we'll be there beside you to assist. We won't be pushing you down so we can achieve things. We want you to succeed.

75 posted on 11/12/2001 4:30:39 AM PST by nancetc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: MaryOH
Please address the actions that I have outlined above.

How do you sanction the release of convicted terrorist???
How do you sanction the first bombing of the WTC???
How do you sanction the bombing of military installations, and the USS Cole.

These are acts of war, all committed during CLINTONS watch, but you seem to conveniently slide past these factual events, to defend treason and perversion.
I would be interested in your thoughts on this.

76 posted on 11/12/2001 5:17:03 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
The man should be drawn and quartered for his treasonous acts and betrayal to our great country.
77 posted on 11/12/2001 7:08:23 AM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
Excellent pix my friend, excellent....
78 posted on 11/12/2001 7:13:18 AM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Well, Clinton WOULD NOT tell the truth. Does that count?
79 posted on 11/12/2001 7:28:33 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Wrong. It wasn't only black Africans. MUSLIM traders were the culprits who sold slaves. Africans "only" captured them. Thank their chiefs for that.
80 posted on 11/12/2001 7:30:52 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson