Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Executive Order Would Further Restrict Access to Presidential Records
AP ^ | 11.01.01 | Sonya Ross

Posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:59 AM PST by callisto

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush will soon issue an executive order allowing a sitting president to withhold a predecessor's papers from the public - even if the past president wanted them released.

The White House denied Thursday the move, which has raised the ire of historians and others who work with presidential records, was designed to shroud the actions of current Bush aides who worked in previous administrations.

"That's a mischaracterization," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

He said Bush is simply seeking to establish a process for releasing documents under the 1978 Presidential Records Act. The act, enacted after Watergate and former President Nixon's attempts to hold on to his papers and tape recordings, provides for the systematic release of presidential records 12 years after the administration is out of office.

Bush has delayed three times the release of 68,000 pages of confidential communications between President Reagan and his advisers, including vice presidential papers from Bush's father. The papers were to come out in January, the first set scheduled to be released under the 1978 law.

The White House last delayed their release in August, setting no deadline and saying it needed time to review the records since the release would set a precedent for future administrations.

The National Archives, including the Reagan library, wants to make the Reagan documents public.

Fleischer said Bush's order would create "national security exceptions, or executive exceptions if any are required" to the release of papers of former presidents and the current one. He said the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were a compelling reason for having a layer of review by the White House before papers are released.

"The purpose deals with ... valid, ongoing security needs that someone who left office 12 years ago may not be aware of," Fleischer said. "It provides for a safety valve for a current administration to also review that information, discuss it with the reps of a previous president, so if there is something that makes it a current security issue ... there's a proper procedure to have the information released while maintaining any security needs."

He denied that the White House is seeking to protect those who worked in the Reagan and previous Bush administrations. Asked whether Bush's order would make it more difficult for reporters or researchers to access presidential documents, Fleischer said, "You have to read the executive order to make that determination."

Anna Nelson, a declassification expert and historian at American University, said a current administration has no business interpreting what a past administration wants out or doesn't want out.

"That's politically explosive, if nothing else," she said.

She said Bush's draft executive order is in direct contradiction of the Presidential Records Act, which says presidential documents are to be opened in 12 years.

"I think its a travesty," Nelson said. "I think Congress ought to do something about it."

Steve Aftergood, director of the government secrecy project at the Federation of American Scientists, said the Bush administration is making it twice as difficult to get access to documents of past administrations.

He said no one, especially considering America's new war on terrorism, would object to keeping national security documents under wraps. But he said there already were provisions to prevent the release of these type of records.

AP-ES-11-01-01 1149EST


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:59 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: callisto
"I think its a travesty," Nelson said. "I think Congress ought to do something about it."

I feel the same way about the hold up of appointees to this administration and the bench.

2 posted on 11/01/2001 9:15:26 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Bush has delayed three times the release of 68,000 pages of confidential communications between President Reagan and his advisers, including vice presidential papers from Bush's father.

That's a lot of pages to sift through. It seems to me that they ought to release what they can now, and postpone the questionable ones. They could even consult with Congress about amending this act, if it seems appropriate.

3 posted on 11/01/2001 9:15:31 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
My only question is: is this really the time to be expending energy over this issue?
I mean, GWB has a pretty full plate right now, and this has the earmarks of
a partisan pissing contest. JMHO
4 posted on 11/01/2001 9:21:01 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
.
5 posted on 11/01/2001 9:54:47 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
typical
6 posted on 11/01/2001 10:07:58 AM PST by Scholastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: callisto
bump for freeper comments. It seems this is the Demorats latest beef to discredit the administration.
8 posted on 11/01/2001 11:17:17 AM PST by Danette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
how bout an executive order to seal our boarders! don't mean to change the subject. But has anyone seen the article on WND about allowing Middle Easterns coming into the US and attending our flight schools.... what's going on here, haven't we learned our lesson since 9-11?!?!? !!!
9 posted on 11/01/2001 11:24:51 AM PST by jb54tx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danette
Well, the Demoncraps couldn't bitch about if it the Republocrats weren't doing it! Sheesh....
10 posted on 11/01/2001 11:32:40 AM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Converse Lee
This means those papers show that Reagan and GHW Bush were fully involved in Iran-Contra ...

Cite, please.

I happen to "know" classified information from over twenty years ago.
AFAIK, it's still classified and NOT to be revealed.

11 posted on 11/01/2001 11:42:01 AM PST by dbbeebs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: callisto
So what hapened to the Clinton papers that were suppose to be released on Sept 11th.
12 posted on 11/02/2001 3:42:33 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Because Bush' agenda is currently full and because the nation's attention is focused on the war and because any criticism of Bush is interpreted by some mindless people as being anti-American as a result now is the perfect time for him to advance his agenda on this issue.
13 posted on 11/17/2001 10:59:15 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson