Killing Terrorists or Kids?

Indy Media UK ^ | October 29 2001 | Bangpound.org

[wideawake]

No dude . . . I heard it was like . . . like . . . one billion babies killed in Iraq, dude . . . or maybe it was one gazillion . . . yeahy, I totally read that on the Mumiaweb, dude . . . PASS THE BONG ALREADY, MAN!

[Poohbah]

Oh, really? And you know this because the Taliban said so? Or did the NATO AWACS planes take a break from dispensing chemtrails and use their radar to beam this data directly into your mind?

[Fred25]

What the heck is this thing? (photo from England)

[Tempest]

Hey that's cool, now I know what I'm going to dress up as for Halloween. :^D

[Texaggie79]

lol, looks like Björk with a shaved head.

[Mev]

In war s__t happens. Did you feel this badly on 9/11?

[dighton]

A purple wallaby.

[tacticalogic]

I thought it looked more like Elton John's MinnieMe.

[chainsaw]

The collateral damage seems to be far exceeding the terrorist casualties. Apparently another seven children were killed yesterday.

How many children and women were killed here?

[Libertarian_4_eva]

They keep on bringing out that 1,000,000 or 500,000 number and its only women and children? Now thats fuzzy math!

[beethoven]

Good grief, what do you want? Our President said you would not be receiving extensive photographic evidence of the military action at hand, nor would you be provided with every detail of this war.

When you write your bleeding heart crap it shows what little support you give our men and women in the armed forces who are doing an extremely difficult job.

You make me sick.

[SAMWolf]

There's a difference in that part of the world?

[uncbob]

Just like the sanctions on Iraq with about a million woman and kids dead in the last 8 years.

Kinda selective sanctions. Only kill women and children no men

[GeekDejure]

Great Taliban propaganda !!!

[BabylonXXX]

These deaths were caused by bin Laden. If he had turned himself over to American authorities (or better yet - not murdered thousands of Americans on 9/11/01), none of the people in Afghanistan would be dead.

So let me get this straight...

Terrorists murder civilians because of the policies of their leaders, while the US merely kills civilians because of the policies of their leaders.

Have fun explaining that to St. Peter at the Pearly Gates.

[GeekDejure]

I recal skipping past an earlier post that said something like "Americans now prohibited from owning BB guns"!!!

[nopardons]

No, the point is that during war, men, women,and children die. We didn't start this ; but we are going to finish it.

In the history of mankind, " innocents " get killed when war flares. It's way past time for revisionistic history and the PC garbage to be out to rest. War is NOT a video game !Now, people not only get MURDERED on our soil, they get anthrax. We drop food to the starving, the UN sanctions against Iraq is NOT what is causing the people to starve ; it is Saddam building palaces and starving his own.

[gfactor]

what? you mean holding a gun makes one guilty? these are just second ammendment patriots.

[moodymare]

Oh Puhleez!!!! Who started this war anyway?? As I remember it was the powers that be in Afghanistan. If I don't stop hearing about the innocent civilians in the media I think I'm gonna scream!!!! What about the WTC innocents?

[jimkress]

#35

If bin Laden had not murdered 5000 Americans, there would be no bombings in Afghanistan, thus no dead Afghans.

If bin Laden had been turned over to American authorities, there would be no bombings in Afghanistan, thus no dead Afghans.

Even a devotee of Arabic can understand that simple relationship.