Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: martian_22
BTW, just a few years ago, anybody even considering that Xlin-Ton had something to do with the transfere of weapons information to Red China was considered a 100% tin foil certifiable conspiracy nut.......

For what it's worth.

20 posted on 10/24/01 10:11 AM Pacific by martian_22

That just isn't true. Anyone with an ounce of common sense should know that the Chinese did not make millions in illegal camp contributions for nothing in return; in fact, just the opposite should be true. You probably weren't around at the time, but in '96-'97 time frame, I posted everything I could find on this outrage. The media did report it, but the traitor Clinton still managed to avoid prosecution, with help of the dirty Democrats.

69 posted on 10/24/2001 2:22:38 PM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: katze
In the '96-'97 time frame, about 99% of the general populace and the main stream media gave no credence or plausibility to any China/Clinton utterings.

If you published reports then, you were considered a conspiracy nut. Even in '99 the medias(mainstream) didn't want to discuss any VRWC non-sense without solid, sourced proof.

Even today it's considered as some stupid dream chased by Xlin-Ton haters. After all....If anything of substance was evident the DOJ(Reno or Ashcroft) would have prosecuted such a heinous act. It's still in tin-foil territory my friend as far as the "in-the-know" beltway people are concerned.

Me? - I have a different opinion.

72 posted on 10/24/2001 5:58:41 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson