Posted on 10/18/2001 1:24:29 PM PDT by Johnny Shear
I thought it was ABUNDENTLY clear that we all know that punching the pacifist is wrong in the "Real World". but, since this is a PARODY, the punching of the pacifist is only used to make a larger point...That we just might HAVE to use force when dealing with terrorists.
And if so, what is the point of this article? Look at their number 6 for instance.... Student gets back up and says, "I'm sorry you feel the need to hit me to get me to agree with your point of view, but I maintain that violence only produces more violence."
Now...To me, this writer is IGNORING the fact that this is a parody based around how we should treat Bin Laden (Or, all terrorists) over what they did. But, if this writer is NOT ignoring this fact, he is actually saying that we should say to Bin Laden....."I'm sorry you feel the need to hit me to get me to agree with your point of view, but I maintain that violence only produces more violence."
And then, to top is all off, they try and compare the abuse of Blacks during the Civil Rights Movement to WHAT? It seems to me that they are comparing them to the terorrists. And, if we go after the terrorists, that is as bad as the fools who tried to stop the Civil Rights Movement. This simply AMAZES ME!!!
Is it just me or is this writer as big of an IDIOT as is possible? I mean, I can understand some dim-wit not understanding the parody and stating it is WRONG to punch a pacifist, but I can't believe that anyone at Democratic Underground is STUPID enough to allow this to be posted to their front page.
Or, am I missing something??? Are they trying to make a larger point? A point I or any of us may not agree with, but a point none the less?
The left. What a bunch of maroons. "Got Brains?"
11. Conservative slinks away distraught, his entire worldview shattered.
12. Student is dead. Conservative may feel bad, but quickly forgets it because student no longer exists.
That's what they don't realize. Osama will keep pounding us if we do nothing. The difference is that he won't 'slink away', but will smile when he realizes he's killed us all.
They also seem to lack the ability to distinguish the difference between a bully pushing someone out of the way and a terrorist killing 5,000 innocent civilians.
But then that's what makes us love in 'DUH' viduals that much more...
ROFLOL!!!! Thanks for my "laugh of the day"!
He said no.
So don't be surprised if some of these idiots wouldn't let their wives or kids be raped.
do the democrips actually think that someone being hit actually wouldn't try to hit back? What do they think they are Ghandi now?
1. Terrorist approaches student talking about peace and saying there should be no retaliation.
2. Terrorist engages in brief conversation, asks if military force is appropriate.
3. Student says, "No." Terrorist asks, "Why not?"
4. Student says something to the effect of, 'Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence.'
5. When student is in mid sentence, terrorist punches him in the face as hard as he can.
6. Student gets back up and says, "I'm sorry you feel the need to hit me to get me to agree with your point of view, but I maintain that violence only produces more violence."
7. Terrorist punches student in the face again, harder this time.
8. Steps 6 and 7 repeat as many times as necessary. 9. Terrorist finally gets it through his puny little brain that violence, indeed will not be responded to. Terrorist stops punching student and takes his money.
10. Student stands there and lets him take money.
11. Terrorist follows him home and moves into student's house. Student responds by turning up stereo.
12. Terrorist shoots student and keeps house for himself.
13. Neighbors frown disapprovingly, but there being no one who will move against him. Terrorist gets new neighbors from among the millions that don't mind what terrorist is doing to the hated enemy.
"That, my friends, is the power of non-violence". Gandhi raised an army that was responsible for killing over 4 million Indians to solidify control. His tactics only work against those who care what the civilized world thinks of them. Does anyone think that the reason that the Nazis rounded up and slaughtered the Jews was because they fought back? ...Gandhi suggested that the Jews present their throats to Hitler.
Bull Connor had to stop because, in the end, there were other people with guns who disapproved.
I can see one of the many idiots on that site posting this but they've got it on their FRONT PAGE!?????
Are they SERIOUSLY tying to compare the abuse of Civil Rights Leaders to us taking military action against Osama bin Laden?
I am looking for someone with a little better writing skills than I to confirm I am correct in thinking they've compeletly lost it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.