Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

anthrax found at ny governers office - breaking
fox news

Posted on 10/17/2001 8:56:23 AM PDT by freeper12

anthrax found at ny governers office - breaking


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-144 next last
To: dead
You are very wrong, I'm afraid. Don't you get it yet? Even if the terrorists who just rearranged the Manhattan skyline had no sophisticated delivery system, there are any number of simple of means by which they could do a lot more damage with the anthrax they have than by mailing samples to a handful of individuals. Why haven't they, then? [Puts on thinking cap] Uh, because this is a campaign of intimidation, not the real thing ("1st case of disease now blow away this dust so you see how the real thing flys").

The reality is, there are jars of weaponized anthrax, sufficient to kill every person in the USA, sitting on some terrorist's kitchen self right now. As long as there are planes in the air, trucks on the road, subways, skyscrapers with centralized A/C, shopping malls, indoor sports events, etc., the potential exists for someone to take that anthrax and kill, at minimum, thousands of people. At maximum, in a coordinated attack, the death-toll could easily exceed the devastation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

81 posted on 10/17/2001 10:01:05 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
We'd better find the sender PDQ...

Well, you're right about that. But it won't happen with today's mail technology.

Last year at this time, we were complaining about more rate hikes (another coming 2002, BTW). This time next year, we'll be salvaging the desimated mail system and implementing identification on all sent mail. Computers can do it. It'll just be a pain for us carbon units for awhile.

Bye bye privacy. But then again, I never did open mail that didn't have a return address that matched the cancel stamp...

This is not "1984" people, it's NOW.
82 posted on 10/17/2001 10:01:37 AM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
1. the flu is a virus. The standard advice has been to NOT take antibiotics for a virus, because it will do nothing.

Antibiotics are needed for flu season not because antibiotics help against the flu virus, but because the flu and other viral infections open the door for opportunistic bacterial infections. For example, it's common for the flu (viral) to transition into bacterial pneumonia. See: http://www.medinfo.ufl.edu/cme/flu/viral.html

2. are you a doctor? At a press conference yesterday it came out that doctors are cleaning out cipro from pharmacies -- for themselves and their families. Your advice would seem to counter the advice doctors are giving themselves, and their families. What are your medical qualifications to give out this type of advice?

His point was that if people start stocking up on antibiotics "just in case", supplies will be depleted and there won't be enough for the people who *really* need them. He's absolutely right, and the fact that some doctors are selfishly helping to contribute to the problem doesn't change that.

83 posted on 10/17/2001 10:07:56 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: mlmr
He is going to Shanghai for some conference. This was on his schedule before the WTC disaster.
85 posted on 10/17/2001 10:10:06 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Octavius
We must declare the right to respond non-conventionally.

My thoughts exactly. Time to show our resolve. They have escalated this, so we should do the same. They cannot keep up. There is a time and a place for nukes--now is the time, we just need to hit a few places.

86 posted on 10/17/2001 10:13:47 AM PDT by TankerKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
A couple of long articles on Anthrax testing the last couple of days.

What I'm gathering is there's a breakdown in communication between medical/lab types and law enforcement types. Not surprising, they speak entirely different languages, and we haven't been testing everything in sight for Anthrax before.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/643295.asp

"ANTHRAX is a member of the large Bacillus family of bacteria. So are germs that cause mild food poisoning and others that are harmless to people. Emergency workers checking suspicious letters like the one Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle got Monday can do quick tests to determine if signs of the large Bacillus family exist to give reason to worry about anthrax. But this rapid first test is very often wrong because it cannot tell if B. anthracis, the specific anthrax germ, is the culprit or if less harmful Bacillus bugs are present, say biologists."

87 posted on 10/17/2001 10:15:45 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: dead
I didn’t say I wasn’t PO’d...

I think you missed his point. I believe he was asking you at what point would you legitimize defense of such proportions that would necessitate weapons of mass destruction. I could be wrong.

That time has passed for me, and I can nail down the moment it happened. When the Taliban and their thugs spread the first grain of Anthrax here, after we began retaliation, I learned that those people will kill, no matter our response. Enough said. I will not sit by and take it. I'm not in the military, but I'm not pushover either.

Kill 'em.
88 posted on 10/17/2001 10:16:56 AM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dead
My point, dumbass, was that these anthrax attacks are no reason to be frightened out of attacking Iraq.

Au contraire, my friend. I'd love to think otherwise -- no one on this forum has been more enthusiastic about nuking Saddam's bunker, right from Day 1. Let's face it, we screwed up (actually, Clinton screwed up). I do not envy the people who have to take those decisions now. It is a very, very disturbing situation.

89 posted on 10/17/2001 10:19:37 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
For the "Chicken Littles" here at FR, we should remember that practically none of those exposed to anthrax have been identified by them walking into a doctor's surgery and saying "I don't feel good". They have all been identified by their proximity to a known site of contamination. This should tell us that the biomedical threat posed by the bacteria is, so far, lagging somewhat behind the hype and the hysteria.

To a certain extent, we are in unchartered waters here. This is something of a trial balloon for the terrorists and for us coping with it. In the future, this will be written up in medical and scientific journals as an epidemiological case study on the utility of anthrax for mass infection.

If I were a terrorist at this moment, I would be roundly pleased with the panic and hysteria caused by my actions, but rather disappointed with the biomedical consequences.

90 posted on 10/17/2001 10:20:05 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Octavius has been whining "Where's Bush" on ALL these threads; in fact there's such a shrill, panicky tone to his rants that I suspect he's really an "Octavia".

Yeah, you got that right hellin! Not to mention that Bush has been very accountable for where he is and what he's been doing, somuchso that a "person" would have to be blind to not see where he is and has been. Guess it's hard for Octavia living with that kind of disability. (no offense to any actual blind people....I suspect they can see much clearer than this whiner.)

The thing with GWB is HE IS THE PRESIDENT and has president's duties to carry out which include handling all this mess rather than sitting down and holding whiners hands. He is THE PRESIDENT, not a nursemaid for the timid. Our President is a tender and compassionate man when called for, towards those who really are suffering, not towards those crying wolf!

91 posted on 10/17/2001 10:20:08 AM PDT by WomanofStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
The reality is, there are jars of weaponized anthrax, sufficient to kill every person in the USA, sitting on some terrorist's kitchen self right now. As long as there are planes in the air, trucks on the road, subways, skyscrapers with centralized A/C, shopping malls, indoor sports events, etc., the potential exists for someone to take that anthrax and kill, at minimum, thousands of people. At maximum, in a coordinated attack, the death-toll could easily exceed the devastation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Nonsense. We do not have evidence that Iraq has the technology to make anthrax small enough to be useful as a weapon or the ability to transform the naturally sticky condition into a dry powder necessary for effective disbursement.

In fact, Iraqi attempts to use anthrax against the Kurds in their own country has repeatedly met with failure, because of their inability to deliver the spores effectively.

Secondly, Iraq does not possess the highly specialized equipment necessary to disperse anthrax effectively. Even if they did, they’d have to deliver these specially outfitted planes to America (how would they accomplish that? stick them up their ass like a bag of heroin?), and deploy them unnoticed over a large city without getting shot down.

In addition, anthrax is not fatal in small doses. Around 10,000 spores are needed to cause a lung infection, which is quite treatable with anti-biotics.

Even in the highly unlikely event that they were able to overcome all these obstacles, they’d need absolutely perfectly conducive weather, with just the right concentrations of temperature, humidity, and wind conditions to succeed with this plot.

My point is merely that fear of anthrax is not a sufficient reason to hold back on an attack on Iraq.

92 posted on 10/17/2001 10:24:42 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: dead
We do not have evidence that Iraq has the technology to make anthrax small enough to be useful as a weapon or the ability to transform the naturally sticky condition into a dry powder necessary for effective disbursement.

Actually, we do. They just needed a vehicle to deliver it. The UN found tons of this stuff in Iraq before they were booted out. Has it gone anywhere? Maybe, maybe not.

My point is merely that fear of anthrax is not a sufficient reason to hold back on an attack on Iraq.

Agreed. I would like to know, however, if a nucelar explosion would kill the bacteria that is anthrax. Call it sterilization. Kinda like Listerine... it doesn't kill anything, but it sterilizes the bacteria from multiplying.
93 posted on 10/17/2001 10:30:04 AM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: tray-sea
I think it's time for me to call my doctor and get some cipro and or doxycycline or tetracycline onhand for some future potential emergency...

Unless you're actually in a place that has a high likelihood of being a "preferred target", that would actually be a very selfish thing to do, since it would deplete our stocks of antibiotics and take them away from those who really need them.

94 posted on 10/17/2001 10:30:42 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
gee that makes me feel better about it. Didn't china knock one of our military planes out of the sky and hold our crew hostage for a while. Maybe they got him covered by one of the ufo flying machines in A51? Then he'd be safe eh?
95 posted on 10/17/2001 10:38:38 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush
DEATH TO ALL TERRORISTS!
96 posted on 10/17/2001 10:41:30 AM PDT by deathtoallterrorists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

This may be a bit premature, but should we start a Rudy for Governor campaign?
97 posted on 10/17/2001 10:42:07 AM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
So all the selfish people get to live and all us good guys perish? I haven't tried to get Cipro but I have inquired about a Youth Gas Mask for my child. They are not to be found (children in Israel all have one). Am I to believe that Cipro will be available when I need it? We already know we don't have nearly enough.
98 posted on 10/17/2001 10:42:43 AM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
I sure am glad the FDA has kept the one plant capable of producing anthrax vaccine from operating.

What was the terrible infraction? Were they lableing the vaccine "fat free" instead of "mostly fat free"?

99 posted on 10/17/2001 10:42:49 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #100 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson