To: KingKongCobra
I understand his reasoning, but disagree with it frequently. One of the reasons why Henry Bonilla, not Ron Paul, would be the best conservative to suceed Phil Gramm. If Paul gets in, expect to see the GOP lose a lot of votes on a 50-49-1 vote (the "present" vote being cast by Ronny). He's vote against something EVEN if he supports the issue.
12 posted on
10/16/2001 5:59:21 PM PDT by
BillyBoy
To: BillyBoy
I for one would vote for Ron Paul for senator, but never Henry Bonilla. The run of the mill isn't for me anymore.
15 posted on
10/16/2001 6:05:20 PM PDT by
corriee
To: BillyBoy
If Paul gets in, expect to see the GOP lose a lot of votes on a 50-49-1 vote (the "present" vote being cast by Ronny). Ron Paul would never win a Republican primary in Texas. Never.
17 posted on
10/16/2001 6:06:41 PM PDT by
sinkspur
To: BillyBoy
One of the reasons why Henry Bonilla, not Ron Paul, would be the best conservative to suceed Phil Gramm. Henry Bonilla is a conservative??? Well, I guess if Liddy Dole can pass as a conservative then so can he.
23 posted on
10/16/2001 6:15:58 PM PDT by
Satadru
To: BillyBoy
He's vote against something EVEN if he supports the issue.If the issue is violating the Constitution, he doesn't support it. Nor should he, or anyone else.
To: BillyBoy
Henry Bonilla might be "the best conservative" if he were being compared to Hillary Clinton or Barney Frank. Bonilla is a liberal. He's typical of republican politicians, most of whom are liberals. Ron Paul is one of the few conservatives in Congress.
56 posted on
10/16/2001 6:55:46 PM PDT by
Twodees
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson