Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Text of H.R. 3076- September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001
Thomas ^ | 10/16/2001 | Ron Paul

Posted on 10/16/2001 5:25:12 PM PDT by Demidog

September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 3076 IH

107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3076

To authorize the President of the United States to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 10, 2001

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To authorize the President of the United States to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) That the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 upon the United States were acts of air piracy contrary to the law of nations.

(2) That the terrorist attacks were acts of war perpetrated by enemy belligerents to destroy the sovereign independence of the United States of America contrary to the law of nations.

(3) That the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks were actively aided and abetted by a conspiracy involving one Osama bin Laden and others known and unknown, either knowingly and actively affiliated with a terrorist organization known as al Qaeda or knowingly and actively conspiring with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, both of whom are dedicated to the destruction of the United States of America as a sovereign and independent nation.

(4) That the al Qaeda conspiracy is a continuing one among Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and others known and unknown with plans to commit additional acts of air piracy and other similar acts of war upon the United States of America and her people.

(5) That the act of war committed on September 11, 2001, by the al Qaeda conspirators, and the other acts of war planned by the al Qaeda conspirators, are contrary to the law of nations.

(6) That under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress has the power to grant letters of marque and reprisal to punish, deter, and prevent the piratical aggressions and depredations and other acts of war of the al Qaeda conspirators.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT.

(a) The President of the United States is authorized and requested to commission, under officially issued letters of marque and reprisal, so many of privately armed and equipped persons and entities as, in his judgment, the service may require, with suitable instructions to the leaders thereof, to employ all means reasonably necessary to seize outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and its territories the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions and depredations perpetrated upon the United States of America on September 11, 2001, and for any planned future air piratical aggressions and depredations or other acts of war upon the United States of America and her people.

(b) The President of the United States is authorized to place a money bounty, drawn in his discretion from the $40,000,000,000 appropriated on September 14, 2001, in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorists Attacks on the United States or from private sources, for the capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, under the authority of any letter of marque or reprisal issued under this Act.

(c) No letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued by the President without requiring the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President shall determine is sufficient to ensure that the letter be executed according to the terms and conditions thereof.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: KingKongCobra
"This is a waste of time."

I don't think so and I'll tell you why. Under the provisions of this act, captured "belligerants" will be tried in military courts. A solution I whole-heartedly approve of as I don't believe the American public should be saddled with the indignity of providing public trials to these monsters and the danger of giving them a forum.

121 posted on 10/16/2001 9:29:57 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LincolnLover
"They have no binding force."

Probably because our U.S. Constitution/Bill of Rights is the Supreme law of the land. That means nothing can be deleted from it...though amendments can be added if they are in harmony with the whole document and no conflict is found.

Congress can pass no laws, even laws Congress wants to pass which are based on treaties and the enforcements thereof which are not in pursuance to the Constitution. (Article VI, para 2.)

Article I, Section 8 declares that Congress has the power to grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, [but it has no power to nullify that power, either by legislation, treaty, or amendment]. IMO. Looks to me like this article is still operational.

122 posted on 10/16/2001 10:01:48 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Since when is the UN a sovereign state? I could care less if you crossed their claimed borders. But they do have security guys with guns and a limited amount of space to protect.

NYC has lots of different people, but there you can at least go a little ways and be able to hide out as part of the general population. I doubt Tehran has an Americatown or any place easy so easy to hide in.

123 posted on 10/16/2001 10:07:19 PM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rainingred
I always want your kind of help. :)

Just the acknowledgement that I'm not alone is a load off.

124 posted on 10/16/2001 10:16:09 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk
Isn't it funny? The 4 year contract for an enlisted man violates the constitution. The constitution is a completely disrespected document. People despise it. Perhaps because everytime they read it, they realize just how illegitimate most government actions are?
125 posted on 10/16/2001 10:19:15 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
I read a published copy of the log book from two cruises of an American privateer in the War of 1812. I assume that besides it just being common, sensible practice, the log would be used in the claims court:

District and Port of Bristol, October 13th, 1812

I, Oliver Wilson, commander of the brig Yankee, do solemnly swear that the foregoing is a true journal of the late course of said brig and that all the material occurrences on the course are therein faithfully recorded.

So help me God.
Oliver Wilson

Sworn to before
Charles Collins

These guys had the problem of getting whole ships back to the claims court, dividing up the crew and dealing with prisoners. In one case, they gave a captured ship to their prisoners and sent them off. You could do that today if you decided that someone was worth giving captured goods away to, and I don't think the claims court would have a problem with it. On land, I suppose the best way would be to raid supply depots and distribute what food you don't need to the people living there, if you could do it without compromising yourselves.
126 posted on 10/16/2001 10:24:36 PM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk
Doesn't that just mean that Congress would have to get together every two years to vote on a new appropriation of money for the same standing Army? So they can't just say that so much of the budget goes to the Army for the rest of time and then forget about it and not be involved in oversight?
127 posted on 10/16/2001 10:29:07 PM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Doesn't it occur to anyone (like R. Paul), that lots of the provisions in this bill are identical to the ones in the terrorist bill that would allow the FBI and CIA powers equal to local police forces?

Most of the people applauding on this thread are the same ones who go apoplectic over the "extra-constituionality" of the terrorism bill, so using their lame hysterics, what would stop another corrupt, Clinton-like administration from turning these Pirate Busters on American gun-owners or bong users or cyber-kiddie porn fans? What stops them from seizing your stuff when their sojourn in the dust & flea capital of the world ends? Courtesy of gun-grabbing President, John Edwards.

If it's all the same to Mr. Paul, I prefer the knowledge that the 10th Mountain Division is paying a silent visit to the Talibaniacs. But I guess a bunch of free-lance, glory boys stumbling around millions of acres of Afghan rock piles and mine fields could serve as pretty cool decoys, so...bring 'em on! It would be fun to see who signed up.

128 posted on 10/16/2001 10:36:11 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Your last paragraph was my second question.

If it's in the Constitution, why do we need this bill? Isn't it redundant? And weren't the Contras some of our Marque and Reprisal Guys?

129 posted on 10/16/2001 11:01:39 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Deb
But I guess a bunch of free-lance, glory boys stumbling around millions of acres of Afghan rock piles and mine fields could serve as pretty cool decoys, so...bring 'em on! It would be fun to see who signed up.

You never know. Those "glory boys" could be greedy bearded members of the Taliban who want out. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

130 posted on 10/16/2001 11:11:34 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Yeah, right. And just how do the defecting Taliban members learn about any of this?

And the time frame for action is what? When, exactly, will these buckling swashers be ready to kick some goat-roping butt?

PS: Your misuse of Shakespeare is embarrassing.

131 posted on 10/16/2001 11:19:08 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Deb
If it's in the Constitution, why do we need this bill?

Same reason they needed a bill back in 1780. Hope that helps.

132 posted on 10/16/2001 11:25:42 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Doesn't it occur to anyone (like R. Paul), that lots of the provisions in this bill are identical to the ones in the terrorist bill that would allow the FBI and CIA powers equal to local police forces?

Really? Which ones? And you are aware that the actions of private individuals are in a wholly different category than the government employee are you not?

133 posted on 10/16/2001 11:27:31 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Deb; nunya bidness
PS: Your misuse of Shakespeare is embarrassing.

She's right. She's no Lady. Perhaps "Something's rotten in Denmark" would have been more appropriate.

134 posted on 10/16/2001 11:40:39 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Styria
Thanks for the explanation of Marque and Reprisal

...whoever has them [ Marque and Reprisal] will have the nightmare of infiltrating countries where the people look different and speak different languages.

Americans come in all shapes and sizes and many speak different languages. This is one nightmare I think some enterprising Americans could wake up from.

BTW It's nice to see so many Constitution lovers on FR today.

135 posted on 10/16/2001 11:44:51 PM PDT by rainingred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Perhaps your right.

How's this:


PROSPERO Dost thou think so, spirit?

ARIEL Mine would, sir, were I human.

PROSPERO And mine shall.

Hast thou, which art but air, a touch, a feeling

Of their afflictions, and shall not myself,

One of their kind, that relish all as sharply,

Passion as they, be kindlier moved than thou art?

Though with their high wrongs I am struck to the quick,

Yet with my nobler reason 'gaitist my fury

Do I take part: the rarer action is

In virtue than in vengeance: they being penitent,

The sole drift of my purpose doth extend

Not a frown further. Go release them, Ariel:

My charms I'll break, their senses I'll restore,

And they shall be themselves.

ARIEL I'll fetch them, sir.


Where's that soft white part you protect? Do you always sleep on your stomach? Better pay attention. You might roll over.
136 posted on 10/16/2001 11:45:43 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Looks like H.R. 3076 is the first step in activating the process of granting Letters of Marque by spelling out the terms and authorizing the president to act in this specific instance.

Re: the Contra's? Interesting question, but one that I wouldn't attempt to figure out.

137 posted on 10/17/2001 12:04:05 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember
Thanks for the links. Made life a bit easier.

Something tells me snail mail would be less welcome and a heck of a lot slower these days.

138 posted on 10/17/2001 12:08:01 AM PDT by rainingred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Somebody's been in the Ripple.
139 posted on 10/17/2001 12:33:46 AM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Which ones?

You were saying something about seizures. Isn't that one of the things that scares all the loonies?

Can't this be turned on the gun-owners? Cigarette smokers? Can't president John Edwards use free-lancers to kick your ass, take your guns, house, marital aids and throw you in jail? Weren't the Contras Marque & Reprisal Guys?

140 posted on 10/17/2001 12:41:59 AM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson