Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions for the anti-war crowd: If they question you, ask these back
Jewish World Review ^ | Oct. 16, 2001 | Michael Long

Posted on 10/16/2001 5:00:06 AM PDT by SJackson

The one mistake you made was in your head
How do you sleep?
Ah how do you sleep at night?

--- John Lennon

If the U.S. shifts policy on the Middle East in the wake of attacks on our nation, aren't we signaling to others that the best way to get our attention is to kill our civilians?

Osama bin Laden is at least a multi-millionaire, and perhaps a billionaire. He lives in Afghanistan. Have you protested his failure to build up the infrastructure of his own country, instead of doing what he has done, which is buying personal favor through the occasional donation to an orphanage?

If you condemn the U.S. for responding to violence with violence, do you also condemn the original violence carried out by members of Al Qaeda? How many protests have you attended against Al Qaeda? Against world terror networks? Against various U.S. policies?

Before dropping bombs on the Taliban, the U.S. waited four weeks, securing intelligence and building a coalition. Many anti-war protesters called for just such a demonstration of patience. Have you commended the government for waiting, or do you still protest the government's actions? Why would an observer be incorrect to believe that you will protest the U.S. government no matter what it does?

If you could live in any other country during this period of history, which would it be? In what specific ways is that country superior to the United States? Why have you decided to remain in the U.S.?

Can you name any country other than the U.S. that permits the level of dissent that you yourself engage in? Have you ever publicly or privately expressed gratitude for this unique quality of American life?

Have you protested the oppression and murder of women, homosexuals and of non-fundamentalist Muslims by the Taliban?

When the individuals behind the Anthrax scare are revealed, will you condemn their actions? Will the severity of your condemnation depend on their motivation?

Would you describe yourself as ambivalent about either the American government or the American people? If so, why? What would you change about the American people?

How would bring about such a change? Could any of the methods you prescribe be described as coercive? Under what circumstances is coercion acceptable?

Should Osama bin Laden be tried in an international court? What should the charges be? What reasonable defense could he mount? What should we do with him if he is found "not guilty"?

Can you identify any single act that you are willing to label as absolutely evil?

Can you identify any act against the United States that would incite you to support a violent response? Would a nuclear strike do it? A chemical or biological attack?

What percentage, if any, of the American people (252 million = 90 percent; 210 million = 75 percent, etc.) killed or wounded in terrorist actions would you define as a threshold body count to gain your support for warlike response?

Do you believe that any war sponsored by a Western nation can be just? Can any war sponsored by a non-Western nation be unjust?

Do you consider those killed in the World Trade Center attack to be victims of a) terrorists or b) the U.S. government?

How does your personal style of pacifism differ from religious pacifism? From knee-jerk anti-Americanism? From cowardice?

Can you list any three acts occurring during your lifetime and authorized by the U.S. government of which you approve?

Some anti-war protesters have adopted the slogan "Resist Racist War." Can you name any individuals whom you believe-either on a hunch or with evidence-are prosecuting this war because of hard feelings against Afghans?

If the U.S. were to adopt your position and never fight a war, the country would eventually be occupied by a foreign power. What do you think life would be like in the U.S. under a regime that refused to respond to terrorism, as you prescribe?

Do you consider your right to protest to be have been purchased by others willing to fight for it? If not, what is the source of protection for your right? How do you feel about regimes such as the Taliban, that put down free expression at the point of a sword?

...snip...

Just one more question: How do you sleep, you hypocritical bastards?

Click for complete article


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: SJackson
Huge Bump! Bring on the Daisy Cutters!
21 posted on 11/06/2001 11:05:14 AM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Guy 2
"Except for[ the fact that] many leftists do have answers."

Answers, yes. GOOD answers, no. ;^)

22 posted on 11/06/2001 11:12:26 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Guy 2
Except for many leftists do have answers. I don't have time to go into them but keep in mind that most people who are opposed to what they view as U.S. imperialism do not see themselves as pacifists.

How does our present war constitute U.S. imperialism? It is purely defensive in nature.

23 posted on 11/06/2001 11:15:43 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I said it was to what "they view as imperialism."
24 posted on 11/06/2001 11:26:30 AM PST by Chicago Guy 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Chicago Guy 2
I said it was to what "they view as imperialism."

I know, I was just curious what their arguements are.

25 posted on 11/06/2001 11:42:25 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
There arguments basically are those of "moral equivalence" or that the U.S. has been going around bombing other countries for years -which is true if you don't go any further- and that thus September 11 was an act of retaliation for those actions. Therefore U.S. military strikes are a continuation of old policies. Many of them see the U.S. as trying to dominate the world through the pretense of responding to a terrorist attack.
26 posted on 11/06/2001 11:59:40 AM PST by Chicago Guy 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson